ReasoningAbility.com

Statement – Master Reasoning for Competitive Exams

Boost your understanding of statement with proven strategies designed for competitive exams like SSC, UPSC, and Banking.

Start Practicing Download PDF

Statement-Conclusion Reasoning

Statement-Conclusion is a fundamental type of logical reasoning where you analyze given statements and determine which conclusions logically follow from them. This skill is essential for competitive exams as it tests your ability to process information, identify valid inferences, and make sound judgments - all crucial for administrative and decision-making roles.

In real-life scenarios, this mirrors how we evaluate arguments, assess claims, and make decisions based on available information. Mastering Statement-Conclusion questions can significantly improve your overall reasoning ability and problem-solving skills.

Key Competitive Exams Testing This Topic:

Scoring Potential: Typically 2-5 questions appear in most exams. With proper preparation, you can aim for 100% accuracy in this section, giving you a crucial edge over competitors.

Types of Statement-Conclusion Questions

This type presents one statement followed by multiple conclusions. You must determine which conclusion(s) logically follow from the given statement.

Solved Example 1:

Statement: All doctors are educated. Rahul is a doctor.

Conclusions:
I. Rahul is educated.
II. Some educated persons are doctors.

Solution:
  1. 1. The first statement establishes that being a doctor implies being educated (All doctors → educated).
  2. 2. Since Rahul is a doctor, he must be educated. Conclusion I follows.
  3. 3. The second conclusion reverses the relationship - since all doctors are educated, some educated persons must indeed be doctors. Conclusion II follows.
  4. 4. Therefore, both conclusions I and II follow.

Solved Example 2:

Statement: No Indian city has a population under 10,000. Shimla is an Indian city.

Conclusions:
I. Shimla's population is more than 10,000.
II. Some Indian cities have populations over 1 million.

Solution:
  1. 1. The statement establishes that all Indian cities have populations ≥10,000 ("No...under 10,000").
  2. 2. Since Shimla is an Indian city, its population must be ≥10,000. Conclusion I follows.
  3. 3. The statement doesn't provide any information about cities with populations over 1 million. Conclusion II doesn't follow.
  4. 4. Therefore, only conclusion I follows.
Practice Statement: All students who score above 90% get scholarships. Priya scored 92% in her exams.

Conclusions:
I. Priya will get a scholarship.
II. Some students who get scholarships may have scored less than 90%.

Solution:

1. The statement establishes a direct relationship: score >90% → scholarship.
2. Priya scored 92% (>90%), so she will get a scholarship. Conclusion I follows.
3. The statement doesn't provide information about other ways to get scholarships. We cannot assume some students get scholarships with <90%. Conclusion II doesn't follow.
4. Therefore, only conclusion I follows.

This type presents two or more statements followed by conclusions. You must analyze the combined information to determine which conclusions follow.

Solved Example 1:

Statements:
1. All engineers are logical thinkers.
2. Some logical thinkers are good at puzzles.
3. Akash is an engineer.

Conclusions:
I. Akash is good at puzzles.
II. Some engineers are good at puzzles.

Solution:
  1. 1. From statements 1 and 3: Akash is an engineer → logical thinker.
  2. 2. Statement 2 says some logical thinkers are good at puzzles, but this doesn't necessarily include engineers.
  3. 3. Conclusion I cannot be confirmed because we don't know if Akash falls in the "some" who are good at puzzles.
  4. 4. Conclusion II is possible but not necessarily true based on given information.
  5. 5. Therefore, neither conclusion I nor II follows.

Solved Example 2:

Statements:
1. No fruits are vegetables.
2. All potatoes are vegetables.
3. Some healthy foods are fruits.

Conclusions:
I. No potatoes are fruits.
II. Some healthy foods are not vegetables.

Solution:
  1. 1. From statements 1 and 2: potatoes are vegetables → not fruits. Conclusion I follows.
  2. 2. Statement 3 says some healthy foods are fruits, and statement 1 says no fruits are vegetables.
  3. 3. Therefore, those healthy foods that are fruits are not vegetables. Conclusion II follows.
  4. 4. Both conclusions I and II follow.
Practice Statements:
1. All government employees in Delhi receive housing allowance.
2. Some government employees are teachers.
3. Rina is a teacher in Mumbai.

Conclusions:
I. Rina receives housing allowance.
II. Some teachers in Delhi receive housing allowance.

Solution:

1. Statement 1 specifies Delhi employees, but Rina is in Mumbai. Conclusion I doesn't follow.
2. From statements 1 and 2: Some teachers are government employees in Delhi → they receive housing allowance. Conclusion II follows.
3. Therefore, only conclusion II follows.

These questions present relationships between elements in coded form (symbols or abbreviations) followed by conclusions. You must decode the relationships to evaluate the conclusions.

Solved Example 1:

Statements:
A $ B means "All A are B"
A # B means "Some A are B"
A @ B means "No A are B"

Given:
1. Teachers $ Professionals
2. Doctors # Professionals
3. Engineers @ Doctors

Conclusions:
I. Teachers # Professionals
II. Engineers @ Professionals

Solution:
  1. 1. Decoding statement 1: All Teachers are Professionals.
  2. 2. Decoding statement 2: Some Doctors are Professionals.
  3. 3. Decoding statement 3: No Engineers are Doctors.
  4. 4. Conclusion I: "Teachers # Professionals" would mean "Some Teachers are Professionals," but we know ALL are, so this is technically true but weaker than the given information.
  5. 5. Conclusion II: We know no Engineers are Doctors, and some Doctors are Professionals, but this doesn't tell us about Engineers and Professionals directly. This doesn't necessarily follow.
  6. 6. Therefore, only conclusion I follows.
Practice Statements:
P % Q means "All P are Q"
P & Q means "Some P are Q"
P * Q means "No P are Q"

Given:
1. Students % Learners
2. Employees & Learners
3. Teachers * Employees

Conclusions:
I. Students & Learners
II. Teachers * Learners

Solution:

1. Decoding statement 1: All Students are Learners.
2. Decoding statement 2: Some Employees are Learners.
3. Decoding statement 3: No Teachers are Employees.
4. Conclusion I: "Students & Learners" would mean "Some Students are Learners," which is true since ALL are (but doesn't add new information).
5. Conclusion II: We know no Teachers are Employees, and some Employees are Learners, but this doesn't directly relate Teachers and Learners. Doesn't necessarily follow.
6. Therefore, only conclusion I follows.

These questions present three statements followed by multiple conclusions. You must determine which conclusions logically follow from the combined statements, often requiring Venn diagram analysis.

Solved Example 1:

Statements:
1. Some managers are leaders.
2. All leaders are decision-makers.
3. No decision-makers are impulsive.

Conclusions:
I. Some managers are not impulsive.
II. No leaders are impulsive.

Solution:
  1. 1. From statements 2 and 3: All leaders are decision-makers, and no decision-makers are impulsive → No leaders are impulsive. Conclusion II follows.
  2. 2. From statement 1: Some managers are leaders, and we've established no leaders are impulsive → those managers who are leaders are not impulsive.
  3. 3. However, we don't know about managers who aren't leaders - they could be impulsive or not. So we can only say "some managers are not impulsive" (those who are leaders). Conclusion I follows.
  4. 4. Both conclusions I and II follow.
Practice Statements:
1. All scientists are researchers.
2. Some researchers are professors.
3. No professors are administrators.

Conclusions:
I. Some scientists are professors.
II. No researchers are administrators.

Solution:

1. From statement 1: All scientists are researchers.
2. From statement 2: Some researchers are professors, but these may or may not include scientists. Conclusion I is possible but doesn't necessarily follow.
3. From statement 3: No professors are administrators, but this only applies to the professor subset of researchers. Other researchers could be administrators. Conclusion II doesn't follow.
4. Therefore, neither conclusion I nor II follows.

Step-by-Step Solving Techniques

1. Understand the Statement Structure

Carefully analyze whether the question has single or multiple statements, and identify the type of relationships presented (universal, particular, negative).

  1. Identify the subject and predicate in each statement
  2. Note quantifiers: "all", "some", "no", "none"
  3. Look for negative terms: "not", "never", "no"
  4. Determine if statements are cumulative (build on each other)
Example: For "All A are B. Some B are C.", recognize this as two cumulative universal-particular statements that might connect A to C.
2. Venn Diagram Approach

Visual representation helps clarify relationships between different elements in the statements.

  1. Draw circles for each category mentioned
  2. For "All A are B", place circle A entirely within B
  3. For "Some A are B", overlap circles A and B
  4. For "No A are B", keep circles separate
  5. Shade areas that are empty (for "no" relationships)
Example: For "No politicians are honest. Some honest people are intelligent.", you'd have three separate circles with overlaps only between honest and intelligent.
3. Logical Connectives Rules

Memorize standard logical rules that govern how statements connect to conclusions.

  1. All A are B → Some A are B (particular follows from universal)
  2. All A are B + All B are C → All A are C
  3. No A are B → No B are A (converse holds)
  4. Some A are B → Some B are A (converse holds)
  5. All A are B + Some B are C → No conclusion about A and C
Example: Knowing that "All A are B" and "Some B are C" doesn't guarantee any relationship between A and C helps eliminate wrong options quickly.
4. Elimination Method

Systematically eliminate conclusions that cannot be supported by the given statements.

  1. Check if conclusion introduces new term not in statements
  2. Eliminate conclusions that reverse statements without justification
  3. Reject conclusions that are stronger than statements warrant
  4. Watch for subtle changes in terms (singular/plural, synonyms)
  5. Be wary of conclusions that might be true in real world but not supported by given statements
Example: If statements mention "birds" and conclusion mentions "pigeons", eliminate unless there's a connecting statement.
5. Immediate Inference Rules

Apply immediate inference rules to draw quick conclusions from single statements.

  1. All A are B → Some B are A (conversion)
  2. No A are B → No B are A (conversion)
  3. Some A are B → Some B are A (conversion)
  4. Some A are not B → No immediate converse
  5. "Only A are B" means "All B are A"
Example: From "Only graduates can apply", immediately infer "All who can apply are graduates", not "All graduates can apply".
6. Negative Statement Analysis

Special techniques are needed when statements contain negative terms ("no", "not", "never").

  1. "No A are B" is equivalent to "No B are A"
  2. "Some A are not B" doesn't imply "Some A are B"
  3. With negative premises, conclusion must be negative
  4. Two negative premises cannot yield any conclusion
  5. Negative conclusions require at least one negative premise
Example: From "No cats are dogs" and "Some pets are cats", you can conclude "Some pets are not dogs" but not "Some pets are dogs".

📚 Topic-Wise Practice Worksheets

Master Statement Conclusion with our structured practice materials
Each worksheet includes detailed solutions and explanations

Direct Logical Conclusion Free

10 worksheets available

Direct Logical Conclusion problems present a single statement or two simple statements, followed by conclusions. You must identify which conclusion follows directly from the given information without requiring any additional assumptions or complex reasoning chains.

Start Practicing →
Probabilistic Conclusion Free

10 worksheets available

Probabilistic Conclusion problems involve statements that express likelihoods, percentages, or tendencies (e.g., 'Most people prefer coffee', '90% of students pass'). You must identify the most reasonable conclusion that follows, recognizing that probabilistic statements allow for exceptions.

Start Practicing →
Syllogistic Conclusion Free

10 worksheets available

Syllogistic Conclusion problems present two or three premises (statements) about categories and ask which conclusion logically follows. These problems test your ability to chain relationships using categorical logic (All, Some, No).

Start Practicing →
Contradictory Statement Analysis Free

10 worksheets available

Contradictory Statement Analysis problems present statements that conflict with each other. You must identify the logical inconsistency and determine what can be concluded about the contradictory information.

Start Practicing →
Conditional Logic Conclusion Free

10 worksheets available

Conditional Logic Conclusion problems involve 'if-then' statements (conditionals). You must determine what conclusion follows when given one or more conditional statements and a factual premise. These problems test your understanding of logical implication and its valid inference forms.

Start Practicing →
Quantitative Set Conclusion Free

10 worksheets available

Quantitative Set Conclusion problems combine numerical data (counts, percentages, totals) with set relationships. You must determine what conclusions can be drawn from the given numbers and categories.

Start Practicing →
Conclusion Strength Ranking Free

10 worksheets available

Conclusion Strength Ranking problems present multiple possible conclusions from given premises. You must rank them from strongest to weakest based on how well the premises support each conclusion. These problems test your ability to evaluate the logical force of different inferences.

Start Practicing →
Must Be True Classification Free

10 worksheets available

Must Be True Classification problems present a set of premises followed by statements that need to be classified as 'Must be true', 'Could be true', or 'Must be false' based on the given information. These problems test your ability to distinguish between necessary, possible, and impossible conclusions.

Start Practicing →

📖 Mixed Practice Worksheets

Comprehensive worksheets combining all problem types for Statement Conclusion

Perfect for exam simulation and revision

Mixed Worksheets of Statement Conclusion (All Problem Types Combined for Statement Conclusion) 30 worksheets

Each worksheet contains 20 mixed questions covering all problem types of Statement Conclusion, with detailed solutions and answer keys.

Worksheet-001
Worksheet-002
Worksheet-003
Worksheet-004
Worksheet-005
Worksheet-006
Worksheet-007
Worksheet-008
Worksheet-009
Worksheet-010
Worksheet-011
Worksheet-012
Worksheet-013
Worksheet-014
Worksheet-015
Worksheet-016
Worksheet-017
Worksheet-018
Worksheet-019
Worksheet-020
Worksheet-021
Worksheet-022
Worksheet-023
Worksheet-024
Worksheet-025
Worksheet-026
Worksheet-027
Worksheet-028
Worksheet-029
Worksheet-030

Tips & Tricks for Statement-Conclusion

📚 Frequently Asked Questions About Statement-Conclusion

Statement-Conclusion is a type of logical reasoning question where you're given one or more statements followed by conclusions. You need to determine which conclusions logically follow from the given statements.

It's crucial for competitive exams because:

  • Tests your ability to analyze information and draw valid inferences
  • Evaluates your logical consistency and attention to detail
  • Measures decision-making skills under time pressure
  • Frequently appears in SSC, Banking, UPSC, and other government exams
  • Helps assess administrative aptitude as it mirrors real-world decision-making

To master Statement-Conclusion efficiently:

  1. Understand the basics thoroughly: Master logical connectives (all, some, none) and their implications
  2. Practice with patterns: Solve questions categorized by type (single statement, multiple statements, coded)
  3. Develop visualization skills: Learn to quickly draw mental Venn diagrams
  4. Analyze mistakes: Maintain an error log to identify recurring misunderstanding patterns
  5. Time management: Start with easier questions to build confidence and speed
  6. Mock tests: Regularly take timed tests to simulate exam conditions

Statement-Conclusion questions appear in almost all major competitive exams in India, including:

  • SSC CGL, CHSL, CPO, Steno
  • UPSC CSAT (Civil Services Prelims)
  • IBPS PO, Clerk, SO (Banking Exams)
  • SBI PO, Clerk, SO
  • RRB NTPC, Group D, ALP
  • CAT and other MBA entrance exams
  • State PSCs (UPPSC, MPPSC, BPSC, etc.)
  • Railway Recruitment Board Exams

The weightage varies from 2-5 questions in most exams, but these can be crucial for clearing cutoffs.

Statement-Conclusion is generally considered moderate difficulty but can become tricky due to:

  • Complex wording: Questions often use convoluted language to test reading comprehension
  • Negative statements: "No", "not", "never" can completely change meaning if overlooked
  • Coded relationships: Symbol-based questions require careful decoding
  • Multiple conclusions: Having to evaluate several options increases error chances

Common pitfalls to avoid:

  • Assuming information not given in statements
  • Confusing "some" with "all"
  • Overlooking negative terms in statements
  • Drawing conclusions that are too broad or specific compared to statements
  • Mistaking possibility for logical necessity

To achieve mastery in Statement-Conclusion:

  1. Build strong fundamentals: Thoroughly understand all types of logical statements and their implications
  2. Practice systematically:
    • Start with basic single-statement questions
    • Progress to multiple-statement syllogisms
    • Then tackle coded relationship questions
    • Finally practice mixed question sets
  3. Develop quick recognition: Learn to instantly identify question types and appropriate solving techniques
  4. Time-bound practice: Gradually reduce time per question while maintaining accuracy
  5. Analyze mistakes: For every error, understand exactly why the correct answer differs from your choice
  6. Mock tests: Regularly take full-length reasoning tests to build stamina and exam temperament

Pro Tip: Create a personal "cheat sheet" of common patterns and rules you frequently forget, and review it before every practice session.

SN
Sandeep Nehra

B.Tech (Mech) | MBA (HRM & IB) | Lead Developer & Reasoning Expert (16+ Yrs)

Sandeep is a Mechanical Engineer and dual MBA (HR & International Business) with over 16 years of experience as a Senior Web Architect and Tech Lead. Combining his engineering precision with deep behavioral insights, he founded ReasoningAbility.com to revolutionize competitive exam preparation. His unique methodology — blending logical structuring from engineering with psychological clarity from HRM — helps aspirants crack BITSAT, SSC, and Banking exams faster. His mission remains simple: provide high-quality, free practice resources that turn complex logic into accessible, high-speed solving techniques for students worldwide.

View Full Profile Connect on LinkedIn