Statement-Conclusion - Beginner Level: deductive reasoning BEGINNER

Ready to master statement-conclusion? This concept mastery features 20 beginner-level challenges. Worksheet 2 of 30 sharpens your deductive reasoning skills. Master deductive reasoning, conclusion drawing, inference making through guided practice. Perfect for entry-level test preparation.

📝 Worksheet 2 of 30 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Beginner level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Statement-Conclusion
Worksheet 2 of 30 (6% complete)

Question 1

Premises: If interest rates rise, bond prices fall. If bond prices fall, investors lose money. The Federal Reserve announced a rate hike yesterday. Bond prices dropped 5% today. 1. The rate hike caused bond prices to drop 2. Some investors lost money today 3. All investors lost money Which conclusion is the WEAKEST (most/least strongly supported by the premises)?
The weakest conclusion is: 'All investors lost money' because Only bond investors lost money; other investments may have gained.

Question 2

Premises: All managers are leaders. Some leaders are innovative. No innovative person is conservative. Which conclusion can be drawn with certainty?
Following the logical chain from the premises, 'Some managers are not conservative' is the only conclusion that can be drawn with certainty.

Question 3

Premises: In a study of 10,000 people, 95% who exercised daily reported better sleep. 80% who exercised 3-4 times weekly reported better sleep. 30% who exercised rarely reported better sleep. Sarah exercises 5 times per week. 1. Sarah definitely has better sleep than someone who never exercises 2. Sarah is more likely to have better sleep than the average person 3. Exercise improves sleep quality for most people Which conclusion is the STRONGEST (most/least strongly supported by the premises)?
The strongest conclusion is: 'Exercise improves sleep quality for most people' because Large study shows clear dose-response relationship across population.

Question 4

Premises: In a study of 10,000 people, 95% who exercised daily reported better sleep. 80% who exercised 3-4 times weekly reported better sleep. 30% who exercised rarely reported better sleep. Sarah exercises 5 times per week. 1. Sarah definitely has better sleep than someone who never exercises 2. Sarah is more likely to have better sleep than the average person 3. Exercise improves sleep quality for most people Which conclusion is the WEAKEST (most/least strongly supported by the premises)?
The weakest conclusion is: 'Sarah definitely has better sleep than someone who never exercises' because Correlation doesn't guarantee individual outcomes; individual variation exists.

Question 5

Premises: All students who passed the exam studied at least 10 hours. John studied 15 hours. Mary studied 5 hours. Sarah studied 10 hours exactly. Statement: No one who studied less than 10 hours passed Based only on the premises, is this statement:
Must be true — This is exactly what the premise states (contrapositive)

Question 6

Given: A school has 500 students. 60% are in sports, 40% are in music, 20% are in both activities. How many students are in neither activity? What conclusion can be drawn?
Using set theory and logical deduction from the given numbers, '100 students are in neither activity' is the accurate conclusion.

Question 7

Statement: Most people who exercise regularly live longer. Most people who eat healthy food live longer. Tom exercises regularly and eats healthy food. What is the most reasonable conclusion?
Given the probabilistic nature of the statement, 'Tom will likely live longer than average' is the most reasonable conclusion without overstating certainty.

Question 8

Given: Of 200 job applicants: 120 have experience, 80 have certifications, 50 have both experience and certifications. 30 have neither. What conclusion can be drawn?
Using set theory and logical deduction from the given numbers, '170 applicants have at least one qualification' is the accurate conclusion.

Question 9

Premises: All mammals have hair. Whales are mammals. Dolphins are mammals. Bats are mammals. Some mammals live in water. Some mammals fly. 1. Whales have hair 2. All animals with hair are mammals 3. Some flying animals are mammals Which conclusion is the WEAKEST (most/least strongly supported by the premises)?
The weakest conclusion is: 'All animals with hair are mammals' because The premises don't state this; other animals (e.g., some reptiles) could have hair.

Question 10

Premises: All books in this library are catalogued. Some catalogued items are digital. All digital items are searchable. Which conclusion can be drawn with certainty?
Following the logical chain from the premises, 'Some books are searchable' is the only conclusion that can be drawn with certainty.

Question 11

Premises: All books in this library are catalogued. Some catalogued items are digital. All digital items are searchable. Which conclusion can be drawn with certainty?
Following the logical chain from the premises, 'Some books are searchable' is the only conclusion that can be drawn with certainty.

Question 12

Premises: All mammals have hair. Whales are mammals. Dolphins are mammals. Bats are mammals. Some mammals live in water. Some mammals fly. 1. Whales have hair 2. All animals with hair are mammals 3. Some flying animals are mammals Which conclusion is the WEAKEST (most/least strongly supported by the premises)?
The weakest conclusion is: 'All animals with hair are mammals' because The premises don't state this; other animals (e.g., some reptiles) could have hair.

Question 13

Given: Of 200 job applicants: 120 have experience, 80 have certifications, 50 have both experience and certifications. 30 have neither. What conclusion can be drawn?
Using set theory and logical deduction from the given numbers, '170 applicants have at least one qualification' is the accurate conclusion.

Question 14

Statement: No metal is transparent. Glass is transparent. Which conclusion logically follows?
Based on the given statements, 'Glass is not metal' is the only conclusion that logically follows without making additional assumptions.

Question 15

Statements: No student failed the test. Everyone who didn't study failed the test. Some students didn't study for the test. What can be concluded?
The statements present contradictory information, making 'The statements are logically inconsistent' the most logical conclusion.

Question 16

Statement: 90% of students who attend all classes pass the exam. Sarah attended all classes. What is the most reasonable conclusion?
Given the probabilistic nature of the statement, 'Sarah will likely pass the exam' is the most reasonable conclusion without overstating certainty.

Question 17

Premises: All students who passed the exam studied at least 10 hours. John studied 15 hours. Mary studied 5 hours. Sarah studied 10 hours exactly. Statement: No one who studied less than 10 hours passed Based only on the premises, is this statement:
Must be true — This is exactly what the premise states (contrapositive)

Question 18

Given: A school has 500 students. 60% are in sports, 40% are in music, 20% are in both activities. How many students are in neither activity? What conclusion can be drawn?
Using set theory and logical deduction from the given numbers, '100 students are in neither activity' is the accurate conclusion.

Question 19

Given: Of 200 job applicants: 120 have experience, 80 have certifications, 50 have both experience and certifications. 30 have neither. What conclusion can be drawn?
Using set theory and logical deduction from the given numbers, '170 applicants have at least one qualification' is the accurate conclusion.

Question 20

Statements: All employees must work from office. The company policy allows flexible remote work. John works entirely from home and follows company policy. What can be concluded?
The statements present contradictory information, making 'There's a contradiction in the policies' the most logical conclusion.
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet