ReasoningAbility.com

Master Possibility Case - Beginner Level Problems Possibility Case BEGINNER

Excel in competitive exams with this skill builder ⚡ worksheet on Possibility Case. Worksheet 3 of 10 contains 20 beginner-level problems. Target your step-by-step problem solving skills while practicing possibility case practice, possibility case for competitive exams, and how to solve possibility case.

📝 Worksheet 3 of 10 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Beginner level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Possibility Case
Worksheet 3 of 10 (22% complete)

Question 1

Statements: All machines are devices. No devices is a gadgets. Conclusions: I. No machines is a gadgets. II. All gadgets being machines is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All machines are devices → machines inside devices
Step 2: No devices is a gadgets → devices and gadgets completely separate
Step 3: Since machines inside devices, machines also doesn't touch gadgets

Analytical Method:
All machines are devices (A) + No devices is a gadgets (E) = A + E = E
Result: No machines is a gadgets

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No machines is a gadgets" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All gadgets being machines is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No machines is a gadgets"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 2

Statements: All methods are systems. No systems is a processes. Conclusions: I. No methods is a processes. II. All processes being methods is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All methods are systems → methods inside systems
Step 2: No systems is a processes → systems and processes completely separate
Step 3: Since methods inside systems, methods also doesn't touch processes

Analytical Method:
All methods are systems (A) + No systems is a processes (E) = A + E = E
Result: No methods is a processes

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No methods is a processes" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All processes being methods is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No methods is a processes"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 3

Statements: All tools are gadgets. No gadgets is a machines. Conclusions: I. No tools is a machines. II. All machines being tools is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All tools are gadgets → tools inside gadgets
Step 2: No gadgets is a machines → gadgets and machines completely separate
Step 3: Since tools inside gadgets, tools also doesn't touch machines

Analytical Method:
All tools are gadgets (A) + No gadgets is a machines (E) = A + E = E
Result: No tools is a machines

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No tools is a machines" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All machines being tools is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No tools is a machines"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 4

Statements: All domestic are nocturnal. No nocturnal is a omnivores. Conclusions: I. No domestic is a omnivores. II. All omnivores being domestic is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All domestic are nocturnal → domestic inside nocturnal
Step 2: No nocturnal is a omnivores → nocturnal and omnivores completely separate
Step 3: Since domestic inside nocturnal, domestic also doesn't touch omnivores

Analytical Method:
All domestic are nocturnal (A) + No nocturnal is a omnivores (E) = A + E = E
Result: No domestic is a omnivores

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No domestic is a omnivores" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All omnivores being domestic is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No domestic is a omnivores"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 5

Statements: All sustainable are beautiful. No beautiful is a reliable. Conclusions: I. No sustainable is a reliable. II. All reliable being sustainable is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All sustainable are beautiful → sustainable inside beautiful
Step 2: No beautiful is a reliable → beautiful and reliable completely separate
Step 3: Since sustainable inside beautiful, sustainable also doesn't touch reliable

Analytical Method:
All sustainable are beautiful (A) + No beautiful is a reliable (E) = A + E = E
Result: No sustainable is a reliable

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No sustainable is a reliable" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All reliable being sustainable is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No sustainable is a reliable"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 6

Statements: All innovative are efficient. No efficient is a accessible. Conclusions: I. No innovative is a accessible. II. All accessible being innovative is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All innovative are efficient → innovative inside efficient
Step 2: No efficient is a accessible → efficient and accessible completely separate
Step 3: Since innovative inside efficient, innovative also doesn't touch accessible

Analytical Method:
All innovative are efficient (A) + No efficient is a accessible (E) = A + E = E
Result: No innovative is a accessible

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No innovative is a accessible" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All accessible being innovative is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No innovative is a accessible"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 7

Statements: All mammals are omnivores. No omnivores is a nocturnal. Conclusions: I. No mammals is a nocturnal. II. All nocturnal being mammals is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All mammals are omnivores → mammals inside omnivores
Step 2: No omnivores is a nocturnal → omnivores and nocturnal completely separate
Step 3: Since mammals inside omnivores, mammals also doesn't touch nocturnal

Analytical Method:
All mammals are omnivores (A) + No omnivores is a nocturnal (E) = A + E = E
Result: No mammals is a nocturnal

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No mammals is a nocturnal" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All nocturnal being mammals is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No mammals is a nocturnal"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 8

Statements: All devices are gadgets. No gadgets is a appliances. Conclusions: I. No devices is a appliances. II. All appliances being devices is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All devices are gadgets → devices inside gadgets
Step 2: No gadgets is a appliances → gadgets and appliances completely separate
Step 3: Since devices inside gadgets, devices also doesn't touch appliances

Analytical Method:
All devices are gadgets (A) + No gadgets is a appliances (E) = A + E = E
Result: No devices is a appliances

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No devices is a appliances" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All appliances being devices is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No devices is a appliances"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 9

Statements: All innovative are rare. No rare is a essential. Conclusions: I. No innovative is a essential. II. All essential being innovative is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All innovative are rare → innovative inside rare
Step 2: No rare is a essential → rare and essential completely separate
Step 3: Since innovative inside rare, innovative also doesn't touch essential

Analytical Method:
All innovative are rare (A) + No rare is a essential (E) = A + E = E
Result: No innovative is a essential

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No innovative is a essential" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All essential being innovative is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No innovative is a essential"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 10

Statements: All useful are versatile. No versatile is a sustainable. Conclusions: I. No useful is a sustainable. II. All sustainable being useful is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All useful are versatile → useful inside versatile
Step 2: No versatile is a sustainable → versatile and sustainable completely separate
Step 3: Since useful inside versatile, useful also doesn't touch sustainable

Analytical Method:
All useful are versatile (A) + No versatile is a sustainable (E) = A + E = E
Result: No useful is a sustainable

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No useful is a sustainable" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All sustainable being useful is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No useful is a sustainable"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 11

Statements: All principles are models. No models is a frameworks. Conclusions: I. No principles is a frameworks. II. All frameworks being principles is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All principles are models → principles inside models
Step 2: No models is a frameworks → models and frameworks completely separate
Step 3: Since principles inside models, principles also doesn't touch frameworks

Analytical Method:
All principles are models (A) + No models is a frameworks (E) = A + E = E
Result: No principles is a frameworks

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No principles is a frameworks" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All frameworks being principles is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No principles is a frameworks"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 12

Statements: All gadgets are ornaments. No ornaments is a electronics. Conclusions: I. No gadgets is a electronics. II. All electronics being gadgets is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All gadgets are ornaments → gadgets inside ornaments
Step 2: No ornaments is a electronics → ornaments and electronics completely separate
Step 3: Since gadgets inside ornaments, gadgets also doesn't touch electronics

Analytical Method:
All gadgets are ornaments (A) + No ornaments is a electronics (E) = A + E = E
Result: No gadgets is a electronics

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No gadgets is a electronics" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All electronics being gadgets is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No gadgets is a electronics"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 13

Statements: All versatile are valuable. No valuable is a accessible. Conclusions: I. No versatile is a accessible. II. All accessible being versatile is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All versatile are valuable → versatile inside valuable
Step 2: No valuable is a accessible → valuable and accessible completely separate
Step 3: Since versatile inside valuable, versatile also doesn't touch accessible

Analytical Method:
All versatile are valuable (A) + No valuable is a accessible (E) = A + E = E
Result: No versatile is a accessible

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No versatile is a accessible" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All accessible being versatile is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No versatile is a accessible"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 14

Statements: All diurnal are wild. No wild is a amphibians. Conclusions: I. No diurnal is a amphibians. II. All amphibians being diurnal is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All diurnal are wild → diurnal inside wild
Step 2: No wild is a amphibians → wild and amphibians completely separate
Step 3: Since diurnal inside wild, diurnal also doesn't touch amphibians

Analytical Method:
All diurnal are wild (A) + No wild is a amphibians (E) = A + E = E
Result: No diurnal is a amphibians

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No diurnal is a amphibians" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All amphibians being diurnal is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No diurnal is a amphibians"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 15

Statements: All systems are patterns. No patterns is a frameworks. Conclusions: I. No systems is a frameworks. II. All frameworks being systems is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All systems are patterns → systems inside patterns
Step 2: No patterns is a frameworks → patterns and frameworks completely separate
Step 3: Since systems inside patterns, systems also doesn't touch frameworks

Analytical Method:
All systems are patterns (A) + No patterns is a frameworks (E) = A + E = E
Result: No systems is a frameworks

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No systems is a frameworks" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All frameworks being systems is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No systems is a frameworks"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 16

Statements: All gadgets are machines. No machines is a vehicles. Conclusions: I. No gadgets is a vehicles. II. All vehicles being gadgets is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All gadgets are machines → gadgets inside machines
Step 2: No machines is a vehicles → machines and vehicles completely separate
Step 3: Since gadgets inside machines, gadgets also doesn't touch vehicles

Analytical Method:
All gadgets are machines (A) + No machines is a vehicles (E) = A + E = E
Result: No gadgets is a vehicles

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No gadgets is a vehicles" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All vehicles being gadgets is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No gadgets is a vehicles"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 17

Statements: All structures are patterns. No patterns is a principles. Conclusions: I. No structures is a principles. II. All principles being structures is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All structures are patterns → structures inside patterns
Step 2: No patterns is a principles → patterns and principles completely separate
Step 3: Since structures inside patterns, structures also doesn't touch principles

Analytical Method:
All structures are patterns (A) + No patterns is a principles (E) = A + E = E
Result: No structures is a principles

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No structures is a principles" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All principles being structures is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No structures is a principles"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 18

Statements: All nurses are musicians. No musicians is a architects. Conclusions: I. No nurses is a architects. II. All architects being nurses is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All nurses are musicians → nurses inside musicians
Step 2: No musicians is a architects → musicians and architects completely separate
Step 3: Since nurses inside musicians, nurses also doesn't touch architects

Analytical Method:
All nurses are musicians (A) + No musicians is a architects (E) = A + E = E
Result: No nurses is a architects

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No nurses is a architects" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All architects being nurses is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No nurses is a architects"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 19

Statements: All utensils are tools. No tools is a ornaments. Conclusions: I. No utensils is a ornaments. II. All ornaments being utensils is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All utensils are tools → utensils inside tools
Step 2: No tools is a ornaments → tools and ornaments completely separate
Step 3: Since utensils inside tools, utensils also doesn't touch ornaments

Analytical Method:
All utensils are tools (A) + No tools is a ornaments (E) = A + E = E
Result: No utensils is a ornaments

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No utensils is a ornaments" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All ornaments being utensils is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No utensils is a ornaments"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Question 20

Statements: All wild are diurnal. No diurnal is a vertebrates. Conclusions: I. No wild is a vertebrates. II. All vertebrates being wild is a possibility.
Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All wild are diurnal → wild inside diurnal
Step 2: No diurnal is a vertebrates → diurnal and vertebrates completely separate
Step 3: Since wild inside diurnal, wild also doesn't touch vertebrates

Analytical Method:
All wild are diurnal (A) + No diurnal is a vertebrates (E) = A + E = E
Result: No wild is a vertebrates

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No wild is a vertebrates" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All vertebrates being wild is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No wild is a vertebrates"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet