Possibility Case: Worksheet 2 - Beginner Practice Possibility Case BEGINNER

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All tools are vehicles → tools inside vehicles
Step 2: No vehicles is a devices → vehicles and devices completely separate
Step 3: Since tools inside vehicles, tools also doesn't touch devices

Analytical Method:
All tools are vehicles (A) + No vehicles is a devices (E) = A + E = E
Result: No tools is a devices

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No tools is a devices" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All devices being tools is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No tools is a devices"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All concepts are principles → concepts inside principles
Step 2: No principles is a theories → principles and theories completely separate
Step 3: Since concepts inside principles, concepts also doesn't touch theories

Analytical Method:
All concepts are principles (A) + No principles is a theories (E) = A + E = E
Result: No concepts is a theories

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No concepts is a theories" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All theories being concepts is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No concepts is a theories"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All concepts are frameworks → concepts inside frameworks
Step 2: No frameworks is a ideas → frameworks and ideas completely separate
Step 3: Since concepts inside frameworks, concepts also doesn't touch ideas

Analytical Method:
All concepts are frameworks (A) + No frameworks is a ideas (E) = A + E = E
Result: No concepts is a ideas

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No concepts is a ideas" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All ideas being concepts is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No concepts is a ideas"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All sustainable are valuable → sustainable inside valuable
Step 2: No valuable is a reliable → valuable and reliable completely separate
Step 3: Since sustainable inside valuable, sustainable also doesn't touch reliable

Analytical Method:
All sustainable are valuable (A) + No valuable is a reliable (E) = A + E = E
Result: No sustainable is a reliable

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No sustainable is a reliable" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All reliable being sustainable is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No sustainable is a reliable"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All accessible are valuable → accessible inside valuable
Step 2: No valuable is a useful → valuable and useful completely separate
Step 3: Since accessible inside valuable, accessible also doesn't touch useful

Analytical Method:
All accessible are valuable (A) + No valuable is a useful (E) = A + E = E
Result: No accessible is a useful

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No accessible is a useful" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All useful being accessible is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No accessible is a useful"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All concepts are frameworks → concepts inside frameworks
Step 2: No frameworks is a ideas → frameworks and ideas completely separate
Step 3: Since concepts inside frameworks, concepts also doesn't touch ideas

Analytical Method:
All concepts are frameworks (A) + No frameworks is a ideas (E) = A + E = E
Result: No concepts is a ideas

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No concepts is a ideas" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All ideas being concepts is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No concepts is a ideas"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All essential are versatile → essential inside versatile
Step 2: No versatile is a innovative → versatile and innovative completely separate
Step 3: Since essential inside versatile, essential also doesn't touch innovative

Analytical Method:
All essential are versatile (A) + No versatile is a innovative (E) = A + E = E
Result: No essential is a innovative

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No essential is a innovative" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All innovative being essential is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No essential is a innovative"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All machines are instruments → machines inside instruments
Step 2: No instruments is a devices → instruments and devices completely separate
Step 3: Since machines inside instruments, machines also doesn't touch devices

Analytical Method:
All machines are instruments (A) + No instruments is a devices (E) = A + E = E
Result: No machines is a devices

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No machines is a devices" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All devices being machines is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No machines is a devices"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All valuable are rare → valuable inside rare
Step 2: No rare is a accessible → rare and accessible completely separate
Step 3: Since valuable inside rare, valuable also doesn't touch accessible

Analytical Method:
All valuable are rare (A) + No rare is a accessible (E) = A + E = E
Result: No valuable is a accessible

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No valuable is a accessible" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All accessible being valuable is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No valuable is a accessible"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All processes are structures → processes inside structures
Step 2: No structures is a strategies → structures and strategies completely separate
Step 3: Since processes inside structures, processes also doesn't touch strategies

Analytical Method:
All processes are structures (A) + No structures is a strategies (E) = A + E = E
Result: No processes is a strategies

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No processes is a strategies" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All strategies being processes is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No processes is a strategies"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All devices are equipment → devices inside equipment
Step 2: No equipment is a utensils → equipment and utensils completely separate
Step 3: Since devices inside equipment, devices also doesn't touch utensils

Analytical Method:
All devices are equipment (A) + No equipment is a utensils (E) = A + E = E
Result: No devices is a utensils

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No devices is a utensils" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All utensils being devices is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No devices is a utensils"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All devices are electronics → devices inside electronics
Step 2: No electronics is a instruments → electronics and instruments completely separate
Step 3: Since devices inside electronics, devices also doesn't touch instruments

Analytical Method:
All devices are electronics (A) + No electronics is a instruments (E) = A + E = E
Result: No devices is a instruments

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No devices is a instruments" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All instruments being devices is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No devices is a instruments"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All reptiles are omnivores → reptiles inside omnivores
Step 2: No omnivores is a herbivores → omnivores and herbivores completely separate
Step 3: Since reptiles inside omnivores, reptiles also doesn't touch herbivores

Analytical Method:
All reptiles are omnivores (A) + No omnivores is a herbivores (E) = A + E = E
Result: No reptiles is a herbivores

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No reptiles is a herbivores" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All herbivores being reptiles is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No reptiles is a herbivores"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All wild are warm-blooded → wild inside warm-blooded
Step 2: No warm-blooded is a amphibians → warm-blooded and amphibians completely separate
Step 3: Since wild inside warm-blooded, wild also doesn't touch amphibians

Analytical Method:
All wild are warm-blooded (A) + No warm-blooded is a amphibians (E) = A + E = E
Result: No wild is a amphibians

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No wild is a amphibians" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All amphibians being wild is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No wild is a amphibians"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All pilots are entrepreneurs → pilots inside entrepreneurs
Step 2: No entrepreneurs is a writers → entrepreneurs and writers completely separate
Step 3: Since pilots inside entrepreneurs, pilots also doesn't touch writers

Analytical Method:
All pilots are entrepreneurs (A) + No entrepreneurs is a writers (E) = A + E = E
Result: No pilots is a writers

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No pilots is a writers" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All writers being pilots is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No pilots is a writers"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All accessible are innovative → accessible inside innovative
Step 2: No innovative is a durable → innovative and durable completely separate
Step 3: Since accessible inside innovative, accessible also doesn't touch durable

Analytical Method:
All accessible are innovative (A) + No innovative is a durable (E) = A + E = E
Result: No accessible is a durable

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No accessible is a durable" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All durable being accessible is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No accessible is a durable"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All wild are diurnal → wild inside diurnal
Step 2: No diurnal is a amphibians → diurnal and amphibians completely separate
Step 3: Since wild inside diurnal, wild also doesn't touch amphibians

Analytical Method:
All wild are diurnal (A) + No diurnal is a amphibians (E) = A + E = E
Result: No wild is a amphibians

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No wild is a amphibians" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All amphibians being wild is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No wild is a amphibians"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All durable are essential → durable inside essential
Step 2: No essential is a useful → essential and useful completely separate
Step 3: Since durable inside essential, durable also doesn't touch useful

Analytical Method:
All durable are essential (A) + No essential is a useful (E) = A + E = E
Result: No durable is a useful

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No durable is a useful" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All useful being durable is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No durable is a useful"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All furniture are gadgets → furniture inside gadgets
Step 2: No gadgets is a equipment → gadgets and equipment completely separate
Step 3: Since furniture inside gadgets, furniture also doesn't touch equipment

Analytical Method:
All furniture are gadgets (A) + No gadgets is a equipment (E) = A + E = E
Result: No furniture is a equipment

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No furniture is a equipment" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All equipment being furniture is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No furniture is a equipment"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All lawyers are pharmacists → lawyers inside pharmacists
Step 2: No pharmacists is a architects → pharmacists and architects completely separate
Step 3: Since lawyers inside pharmacists, lawyers also doesn't touch architects

Analytical Method:
All lawyers are pharmacists (A) + No pharmacists is a architects (E) = A + E = E
Result: No lawyers is a architects

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No lawyers is a architects" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All architects being lawyers is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No lawyers is a architects"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows