Four Statement Complex Advanced Worksheet: Focus on exam-oriented approach Four Statement Complex ADVANCED

Level up your Four Statement Complex skills! You're at Worksheet 8 of 10 (77% through this series). This exam hall simulation worksheet features 20 advanced-level problems with a focus on exam-oriented approach. Topics covered: four statement complex bank exam questions, four statement complex ssc cgl, four statement complex reasoning tricks.

📝 Worksheet 8 of 10 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Advanced level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Four Statement Complex
Worksheet 8 of 10 (77% complete)

Question 1

Statements: Some invertebrates are mammals. All mammals are wild. No wild is a vertebrates. All vertebrates are carnivores. Conclusions: I. Some invertebrates are wild. II. No mammals is a vertebrates. III. Some carnivores are not wild.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some invertebrates are mammals → Partial overlap
2. All mammals are wild → mammals inside wild
3. No wild is a vertebrates → wild and vertebrates separate
4. All vertebrates are carnivores → vertebrates inside carnivores

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some invertebrates are wild"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No mammals is a vertebrates"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some carnivores are not wild"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 2

Statements: Some athletes are architects. All architects are artists. No artists is a nurses. All nurses are doctors. Conclusions: I. Some athletes are artists. II. No architects is a nurses. III. Some doctors are not artists.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some athletes are architects → Partial overlap
2. All architects are artists → architects inside artists
3. No artists is a nurses → artists and nurses separate
4. All nurses are doctors → nurses inside doctors

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some athletes are artists"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No architects is a nurses"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some doctors are not artists"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 3

Statements: Some teachers are pharmacists. All pharmacists are managers. No managers is a accountants. All accountants are pilots. Conclusions: I. Some teachers are managers. II. No pharmacists is a accountants. III. Some pilots are not managers.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some teachers are pharmacists → Partial overlap
2. All pharmacists are managers → pharmacists inside managers
3. No managers is a accountants → managers and accountants separate
4. All accountants are pilots → accountants inside pilots

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some teachers are managers"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No pharmacists is a accountants"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some pilots are not managers"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 4

Statements: Some electronics are vehicles. All vehicles are instruments. No instruments is a equipment. All equipment are gadgets. Conclusions: I. Some electronics are instruments. II. No vehicles is a equipment. III. Some gadgets are not instruments.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some electronics are vehicles → Partial overlap
2. All vehicles are instruments → vehicles inside instruments
3. No instruments is a equipment → instruments and equipment separate
4. All equipment are gadgets → equipment inside gadgets

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some electronics are instruments"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No vehicles is a equipment"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some gadgets are not instruments"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 5

Statements: Some useful are valuable. All valuable are efficient. No efficient is a reliable. All reliable are essential. Conclusions: I. Some useful are efficient. II. No valuable is a reliable. III. Some essential are not efficient.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some useful are valuable → Partial overlap
2. All valuable are efficient → valuable inside efficient
3. No efficient is a reliable → efficient and reliable separate
4. All reliable are essential → reliable inside essential

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some useful are efficient"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No valuable is a reliable"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some essential are not efficient"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 6

Statements: Some structures are models. All models are frameworks. No frameworks is a concepts. All concepts are ideas. Conclusions: I. Some structures are frameworks. II. No models is a concepts. III. Some ideas are not frameworks.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some structures are models → Partial overlap
2. All models are frameworks → models inside frameworks
3. No frameworks is a concepts → frameworks and concepts separate
4. All concepts are ideas → concepts inside ideas

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some structures are frameworks"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No models is a concepts"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some ideas are not frameworks"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 7

Statements: Some reptiles are mammals. All mammals are omnivores. No omnivores is a diurnal. All diurnal are nocturnal. Conclusions: I. Some reptiles are omnivores. II. No mammals is a diurnal. III. Some nocturnal are not omnivores.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some reptiles are mammals → Partial overlap
2. All mammals are omnivores → mammals inside omnivores
3. No omnivores is a diurnal → omnivores and diurnal separate
4. All diurnal are nocturnal → diurnal inside nocturnal

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some reptiles are omnivores"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No mammals is a diurnal"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some nocturnal are not omnivores"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 8

Statements: Some models are frameworks. All frameworks are strategies. No strategies is a systems. All systems are theories. Conclusions: I. Some models are strategies. II. No frameworks is a systems. III. Some theories are not strategies.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some models are frameworks → Partial overlap
2. All frameworks are strategies → frameworks inside strategies
3. No strategies is a systems → strategies and systems separate
4. All systems are theories → systems inside theories

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some models are strategies"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No frameworks is a systems"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some theories are not strategies"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 9

Statements: Some carnivores are cold-blooded. All cold-blooded are herbivores. No herbivores is a domestic. All domestic are warm-blooded. Conclusions: I. Some carnivores are herbivores. II. No cold-blooded is a domestic. III. Some warm-blooded are not herbivores.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some carnivores are cold-blooded → Partial overlap
2. All cold-blooded are herbivores → cold-blooded inside herbivores
3. No herbivores is a domestic → herbivores and domestic separate
4. All domestic are warm-blooded → domestic inside warm-blooded

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some carnivores are herbivores"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No cold-blooded is a domestic"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some warm-blooded are not herbivores"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 10

Statements: Some tools are ornaments. All ornaments are machines. No machines is a devices. All devices are gadgets. Conclusions: I. Some tools are machines. II. No ornaments is a devices. III. Some gadgets are not machines.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some tools are ornaments → Partial overlap
2. All ornaments are machines → ornaments inside machines
3. No machines is a devices → machines and devices separate
4. All devices are gadgets → devices inside gadgets

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some tools are machines"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No ornaments is a devices"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some gadgets are not machines"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 11

Statements: Some architects are managers. All managers are athletes. No athletes is a writers. All writers are musicians. Conclusions: I. Some architects are athletes. II. No managers is a writers. III. Some musicians are not athletes.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some architects are managers → Partial overlap
2. All managers are athletes → managers inside athletes
3. No athletes is a writers → athletes and writers separate
4. All writers are musicians → writers inside musicians

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some architects are athletes"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No managers is a writers"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some musicians are not athletes"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 12

Statements: Some frameworks are principles. All principles are strategies. No strategies is a theories. All theories are processes. Conclusions: I. Some frameworks are strategies. II. No principles is a theories. III. Some processes are not strategies.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some frameworks are principles → Partial overlap
2. All principles are strategies → principles inside strategies
3. No strategies is a theories → strategies and theories separate
4. All theories are processes → theories inside processes

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some frameworks are strategies"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No principles is a theories"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some processes are not strategies"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 13

Statements: Some domestic are reptiles. All reptiles are amphibians. No amphibians is a cold-blooded. All cold-blooded are carnivores. Conclusions: I. Some domestic are amphibians. II. No reptiles is a cold-blooded. III. Some carnivores are not amphibians.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some domestic are reptiles → Partial overlap
2. All reptiles are amphibians → reptiles inside amphibians
3. No amphibians is a cold-blooded → amphibians and cold-blooded separate
4. All cold-blooded are carnivores → cold-blooded inside carnivores

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some domestic are amphibians"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No reptiles is a cold-blooded"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some carnivores are not amphibians"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 14

Statements: Some devices are tools. All tools are appliances. No appliances is a furniture. All furniture are vehicles. Conclusions: I. Some devices are appliances. II. No tools is a furniture. III. Some vehicles are not appliances.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some devices are tools → Partial overlap
2. All tools are appliances → tools inside appliances
3. No appliances is a furniture → appliances and furniture separate
4. All furniture are vehicles → furniture inside vehicles

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some devices are appliances"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No tools is a furniture"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some vehicles are not appliances"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 15

Statements: Some doctors are engineers. All engineers are pharmacists. No pharmacists is a architects. All architects are athletes. Conclusions: I. Some doctors are pharmacists. II. No engineers is a architects. III. Some athletes are not pharmacists.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some doctors are engineers → Partial overlap
2. All engineers are pharmacists → engineers inside pharmacists
3. No pharmacists is a architects → pharmacists and architects separate
4. All architects are athletes → architects inside athletes

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some doctors are pharmacists"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No engineers is a architects"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some athletes are not pharmacists"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 16

Statements: Some ornaments are vehicles. All vehicles are gadgets. No gadgets is a appliances. All appliances are instruments. Conclusions: I. Some ornaments are gadgets. II. No vehicles is a appliances. III. Some instruments are not gadgets.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some ornaments are vehicles → Partial overlap
2. All vehicles are gadgets → vehicles inside gadgets
3. No gadgets is a appliances → gadgets and appliances separate
4. All appliances are instruments → appliances inside instruments

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some ornaments are gadgets"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No vehicles is a appliances"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some instruments are not gadgets"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 17

Statements: Some utensils are electronics. All electronics are vehicles. No vehicles is a instruments. All instruments are gadgets. Conclusions: I. Some utensils are vehicles. II. No electronics is a instruments. III. Some gadgets are not vehicles.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some utensils are electronics → Partial overlap
2. All electronics are vehicles → electronics inside vehicles
3. No vehicles is a instruments → vehicles and instruments separate
4. All instruments are gadgets → instruments inside gadgets

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some utensils are vehicles"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No electronics is a instruments"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some gadgets are not vehicles"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 18

Statements: Some nurses are pilots. All pilots are musicians. No musicians is a managers. All managers are lawyers. Conclusions: I. Some nurses are musicians. II. No pilots is a managers. III. Some lawyers are not musicians.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some nurses are pilots → Partial overlap
2. All pilots are musicians → pilots inside musicians
3. No musicians is a managers → musicians and managers separate
4. All managers are lawyers → managers inside lawyers

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some nurses are musicians"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No pilots is a managers"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some lawyers are not musicians"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 19

Statements: Some versatile are durable. All durable are valuable. No valuable is a sustainable. All sustainable are useful. Conclusions: I. Some versatile are valuable. II. No durable is a sustainable. III. Some useful are not valuable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some versatile are durable → Partial overlap
2. All durable are valuable → durable inside valuable
3. No valuable is a sustainable → valuable and sustainable separate
4. All sustainable are useful → sustainable inside useful

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some versatile are valuable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No durable is a sustainable"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some useful are not valuable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 20

Statements: Some strategies are methods. All methods are ideas. No ideas is a theories. All theories are models. Conclusions: I. Some strategies are ideas. II. No methods is a theories. III. Some models are not ideas.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some strategies are methods → Partial overlap
2. All methods are ideas → methods inside ideas
3. No ideas is a theories → ideas and theories separate
4. All theories are models → theories inside models

Checking Each Conclusion:

Conclusion I: "Some strategies are ideas"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

Conclusion II: "No methods is a theories"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

Conclusion III: "Some models are not ideas"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet