ReasoningAbility.com

Four Statement Complex - Expert Level: conceptual clarity Four Statement Complex EXPERT

This skill evaluation ⚡ worksheet focuses on Four Statement Complex - a key topic in Syllogism. You'll solve 20 expert-level problems (Worksheet 9 of 10). The primary focus is on conceptual clarity. Master four statement complex ssc cgl, four statement complex reasoning tricks, and fast four statement complex solving through systematic practice.

📝 Worksheet 9 of 10 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Expert level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Four Statement Complex
Worksheet 9 of 10 (88% complete)

Question 1

Statements: Some systems are processes. All processes are strategies. No strategies is a frameworks. All frameworks are methods. Conclusions: I. Some systems are strategies. II. No processes is a frameworks. III. Some methods are not strategies.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some systems are processes → Partial overlap
2. All processes are strategies → processes inside strategies
3. No strategies is a frameworks → strategies and frameworks separate
4. All frameworks are methods → frameworks inside methods

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some systems are strategies"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No processes is a frameworks"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some methods are not strategies"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 2

Statements: Some processes are frameworks. All frameworks are systems. No systems is a structures. All structures are principles. Conclusions: I. Some processes are systems. II. No frameworks is a structures. III. Some principles are not systems.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some processes are frameworks → Partial overlap
2. All frameworks are systems → frameworks inside systems
3. No systems is a structures → systems and structures separate
4. All structures are principles → structures inside principles

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some processes are systems"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No frameworks is a structures"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some principles are not systems"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 3

Statements: Some teachers are managers. All managers are athletes. No athletes is a pharmacists. All pharmacists are scientists. Conclusions: I. Some teachers are athletes. II. No managers is a pharmacists. III. Some scientists are not athletes.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some teachers are managers → Partial overlap
2. All managers are athletes → managers inside athletes
3. No athletes is a pharmacists → athletes and pharmacists separate
4. All pharmacists are scientists → pharmacists inside scientists

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some teachers are athletes"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No managers is a pharmacists"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some scientists are not athletes"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 4

Statements: Some versatile are sustainable. All sustainable are reliable. No reliable is a rare. All rare are accessible. Conclusions: I. Some versatile are reliable. II. No sustainable is a rare. III. Some accessible are not reliable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some versatile are sustainable → Partial overlap
2. All sustainable are reliable → sustainable inside reliable
3. No reliable is a rare → reliable and rare separate
4. All rare are accessible → rare inside accessible

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some versatile are reliable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No sustainable is a rare"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some accessible are not reliable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 5

Statements: Some gadgets are machines. All machines are appliances. No appliances is a electronics. All electronics are instruments. Conclusions: I. Some gadgets are appliances. II. No machines is a electronics. III. Some instruments are not appliances.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some gadgets are machines → Partial overlap
2. All machines are appliances → machines inside appliances
3. No appliances is a electronics → appliances and electronics separate
4. All electronics are instruments → electronics inside instruments

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some gadgets are appliances"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No machines is a electronics"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some instruments are not appliances"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 6

Statements: Some frameworks are methods. All methods are ideas. No ideas is a structures. All structures are patterns. Conclusions: I. Some frameworks are ideas. II. No methods is a structures. III. Some patterns are not ideas.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some frameworks are methods → Partial overlap
2. All methods are ideas → methods inside ideas
3. No ideas is a structures → ideas and structures separate
4. All structures are patterns → structures inside patterns

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some frameworks are ideas"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No methods is a structures"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some patterns are not ideas"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 7

Statements: Some diurnal are wild. All wild are carnivores. No carnivores is a warm-blooded. All warm-blooded are cold-blooded. Conclusions: I. Some diurnal are carnivores. II. No wild is a warm-blooded. III. Some cold-blooded are not carnivores.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some diurnal are wild → Partial overlap
2. All wild are carnivores → wild inside carnivores
3. No carnivores is a warm-blooded → carnivores and warm-blooded separate
4. All warm-blooded are cold-blooded → warm-blooded inside cold-blooded

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some diurnal are carnivores"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No wild is a warm-blooded"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some cold-blooded are not carnivores"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 8

Statements: Some durable are sustainable. All sustainable are valuable. No valuable is a versatile. All versatile are reliable. Conclusions: I. Some durable are valuable. II. No sustainable is a versatile. III. Some reliable are not valuable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some durable are sustainable → Partial overlap
2. All sustainable are valuable → sustainable inside valuable
3. No valuable is a versatile → valuable and versatile separate
4. All versatile are reliable → versatile inside reliable

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some durable are valuable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No sustainable is a versatile"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some reliable are not valuable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 9

Statements: Some accessible are sustainable. All sustainable are reliable. No reliable is a beautiful. All beautiful are useful. Conclusions: I. Some accessible are reliable. II. No sustainable is a beautiful. III. Some useful are not reliable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some accessible are sustainable → Partial overlap
2. All sustainable are reliable → sustainable inside reliable
3. No reliable is a beautiful → reliable and beautiful separate
4. All beautiful are useful → beautiful inside useful

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some accessible are reliable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No sustainable is a beautiful"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some useful are not reliable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 10

Statements: Some furniture are ornaments. All ornaments are devices. No devices is a utensils. All utensils are machines. Conclusions: I. Some furniture are devices. II. No ornaments is a utensils. III. Some machines are not devices.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some furniture are ornaments → Partial overlap
2. All ornaments are devices → ornaments inside devices
3. No devices is a utensils → devices and utensils separate
4. All utensils are machines → utensils inside machines

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some furniture are devices"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No ornaments is a utensils"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some machines are not devices"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 11

Statements: Some artists are nurses. All nurses are managers. No managers is a scientists. All scientists are pilots. Conclusions: I. Some artists are managers. II. No nurses is a scientists. III. Some pilots are not managers.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some artists are nurses → Partial overlap
2. All nurses are managers → nurses inside managers
3. No managers is a scientists → managers and scientists separate
4. All scientists are pilots → scientists inside pilots

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some artists are managers"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No nurses is a scientists"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some pilots are not managers"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 12

Statements: Some athletes are lawyers. All lawyers are artists. No artists is a engineers. All engineers are scientists. Conclusions: I. Some athletes are artists. II. No lawyers is a engineers. III. Some scientists are not artists.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some athletes are lawyers → Partial overlap
2. All lawyers are artists → lawyers inside artists
3. No artists is a engineers → artists and engineers separate
4. All engineers are scientists → engineers inside scientists

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some athletes are artists"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No lawyers is a engineers"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some scientists are not artists"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 13

Statements: Some athletes are lawyers. All lawyers are nurses. No nurses is a pilots. All pilots are scientists. Conclusions: I. Some athletes are nurses. II. No lawyers is a pilots. III. Some scientists are not nurses.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some athletes are lawyers → Partial overlap
2. All lawyers are nurses → lawyers inside nurses
3. No nurses is a pilots → nurses and pilots separate
4. All pilots are scientists → pilots inside scientists

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some athletes are nurses"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No lawyers is a pilots"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some scientists are not nurses"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 14

Statements: Some sustainable are beautiful. All beautiful are reliable. No reliable is a valuable. All valuable are accessible. Conclusions: I. Some sustainable are reliable. II. No beautiful is a valuable. III. Some accessible are not reliable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some sustainable are beautiful → Partial overlap
2. All beautiful are reliable → beautiful inside reliable
3. No reliable is a valuable → reliable and valuable separate
4. All valuable are accessible → valuable inside accessible

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some sustainable are reliable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No beautiful is a valuable"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some accessible are not reliable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 15

Statements: Some birds are carnivores. All carnivores are reptiles. No reptiles is a fish. All fish are invertebrates. Conclusions: I. Some birds are reptiles. II. No carnivores is a fish. III. Some invertebrates are not reptiles.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some birds are carnivores → Partial overlap
2. All carnivores are reptiles → carnivores inside reptiles
3. No reptiles is a fish → reptiles and fish separate
4. All fish are invertebrates → fish inside invertebrates

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some birds are reptiles"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No carnivores is a fish"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some invertebrates are not reptiles"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 16

Statements: Some equipment are gadgets. All gadgets are devices. No devices is a vehicles. All vehicles are tools. Conclusions: I. Some equipment are devices. II. No gadgets is a vehicles. III. Some tools are not devices.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some equipment are gadgets → Partial overlap
2. All gadgets are devices → gadgets inside devices
3. No devices is a vehicles → devices and vehicles separate
4. All vehicles are tools → vehicles inside tools

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some equipment are devices"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No gadgets is a vehicles"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some tools are not devices"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 17

Statements: Some models are methods. All methods are ideas. No ideas is a patterns. All patterns are concepts. Conclusions: I. Some models are ideas. II. No methods is a patterns. III. Some concepts are not ideas.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some models are methods → Partial overlap
2. All methods are ideas → methods inside ideas
3. No ideas is a patterns → ideas and patterns separate
4. All patterns are concepts → patterns inside concepts

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some models are ideas"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No methods is a patterns"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some concepts are not ideas"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 18

Statements: Some birds are cold-blooded. All cold-blooded are warm-blooded. No warm-blooded is a reptiles. All reptiles are mammals. Conclusions: I. Some birds are warm-blooded. II. No cold-blooded is a reptiles. III. Some mammals are not warm-blooded.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some birds are cold-blooded → Partial overlap
2. All cold-blooded are warm-blooded → cold-blooded inside warm-blooded
3. No warm-blooded is a reptiles → warm-blooded and reptiles separate
4. All reptiles are mammals → reptiles inside mammals

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some birds are warm-blooded"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No cold-blooded is a reptiles"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some mammals are not warm-blooded"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 19

Statements: Some systems are frameworks. All frameworks are concepts. No concepts is a principles. All principles are ideas. Conclusions: I. Some systems are concepts. II. No frameworks is a principles. III. Some ideas are not concepts.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some systems are frameworks → Partial overlap
2. All frameworks are concepts → frameworks inside concepts
3. No concepts is a principles → concepts and principles separate
4. All principles are ideas → principles inside ideas

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some systems are concepts"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No frameworks is a principles"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some ideas are not concepts"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 20

Statements: Some strategies are structures. All structures are ideas. No ideas is a models. All models are patterns. Conclusions: I. Some strategies are ideas. II. No structures is a models. III. Some patterns are not ideas.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some strategies are structures → Partial overlap
2. All structures are ideas → structures inside ideas
3. No ideas is a models → ideas and models separate
4. All models are patterns → models inside patterns

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some strategies are ideas"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No structures is a models"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some patterns are not ideas"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet