ReasoningAbility.com

Master Four Statement Complex - Intermediate-Advanced Level Problems Four Statement Complex INTERMEDIATE ADVANCED

Excel in competitive exams with this self assessment worksheet on Four Statement Complex. Worksheet 7 of 10 contains 20 intermediate-advanced-level problems. Target your accuracy improvement skills while practicing four statement complex shortcut methods, four statement complex bank exam questions, and four statement complex ssc cgl.

📝 Worksheet 7 of 10 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Intermediate Advanced level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Four Statement Complex
Worksheet 7 of 10 (66% complete)

Question 1

Statements: Some innovative are essential. All essential are useful. No useful is a valuable. All valuable are rare. Conclusions: I. Some innovative are useful. II. No essential is a valuable. III. Some rare are not useful.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some innovative are essential → Partial overlap
2. All essential are useful → essential inside useful
3. No useful is a valuable → useful and valuable separate
4. All valuable are rare → valuable inside rare

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some innovative are useful"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No essential is a valuable"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some rare are not useful"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 2

Statements: Some amphibians are fish. All fish are herbivores. No herbivores is a carnivores. All carnivores are omnivores. Conclusions: I. Some amphibians are herbivores. II. No fish is a carnivores. III. Some omnivores are not herbivores.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some amphibians are fish → Partial overlap
2. All fish are herbivores → fish inside herbivores
3. No herbivores is a carnivores → herbivores and carnivores separate
4. All carnivores are omnivores → carnivores inside omnivores

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some amphibians are herbivores"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No fish is a carnivores"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some omnivores are not herbivores"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 3

Statements: Some beautiful are sustainable. All sustainable are useful. No useful is a valuable. All valuable are accessible. Conclusions: I. Some beautiful are useful. II. No sustainable is a valuable. III. Some accessible are not useful.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some beautiful are sustainable → Partial overlap
2. All sustainable are useful → sustainable inside useful
3. No useful is a valuable → useful and valuable separate
4. All valuable are accessible → valuable inside accessible

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some beautiful are useful"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No sustainable is a valuable"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some accessible are not useful"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 4

Statements: Some warm-blooded are wild. All wild are invertebrates. No invertebrates is a herbivores. All herbivores are amphibians. Conclusions: I. Some warm-blooded are invertebrates. II. No wild is a herbivores. III. Some amphibians are not invertebrates.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some warm-blooded are wild → Partial overlap
2. All wild are invertebrates → wild inside invertebrates
3. No invertebrates is a herbivores → invertebrates and herbivores separate
4. All herbivores are amphibians → herbivores inside amphibians

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some warm-blooded are invertebrates"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No wild is a herbivores"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some amphibians are not invertebrates"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 5

Statements: Some reliable are efficient. All efficient are valuable. No valuable is a rare. All rare are innovative. Conclusions: I. Some reliable are valuable. II. No efficient is a rare. III. Some innovative are not valuable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some reliable are efficient → Partial overlap
2. All efficient are valuable → efficient inside valuable
3. No valuable is a rare → valuable and rare separate
4. All rare are innovative → rare inside innovative

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some reliable are valuable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No efficient is a rare"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some innovative are not valuable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 6

Statements: Some theories are strategies. All strategies are concepts. No concepts is a principles. All principles are patterns. Conclusions: I. Some theories are concepts. II. No strategies is a principles. III. Some patterns are not concepts.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some theories are strategies → Partial overlap
2. All strategies are concepts → strategies inside concepts
3. No concepts is a principles → concepts and principles separate
4. All principles are patterns → principles inside patterns

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some theories are concepts"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No strategies is a principles"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some patterns are not concepts"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 7

Statements: Some wild are carnivores. All carnivores are cold-blooded. No cold-blooded is a reptiles. All reptiles are domestic. Conclusions: I. Some wild are cold-blooded. II. No carnivores is a reptiles. III. Some domestic are not cold-blooded.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some wild are carnivores → Partial overlap
2. All carnivores are cold-blooded → carnivores inside cold-blooded
3. No cold-blooded is a reptiles → cold-blooded and reptiles separate
4. All reptiles are domestic → reptiles inside domestic

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some wild are cold-blooded"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No carnivores is a reptiles"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some domestic are not cold-blooded"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 8

Statements: Some instruments are gadgets. All gadgets are machines. No machines is a appliances. All appliances are vehicles. Conclusions: I. Some instruments are machines. II. No gadgets is a appliances. III. Some vehicles are not machines.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some instruments are gadgets → Partial overlap
2. All gadgets are machines → gadgets inside machines
3. No machines is a appliances → machines and appliances separate
4. All appliances are vehicles → appliances inside vehicles

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some instruments are machines"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No gadgets is a appliances"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some vehicles are not machines"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 9

Statements: Some ideas are structures. All structures are strategies. No strategies is a systems. All systems are concepts. Conclusions: I. Some ideas are strategies. II. No structures is a systems. III. Some concepts are not strategies.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some ideas are structures → Partial overlap
2. All structures are strategies → structures inside strategies
3. No strategies is a systems → strategies and systems separate
4. All systems are concepts → systems inside concepts

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some ideas are strategies"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No structures is a systems"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some concepts are not strategies"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 10

Statements: Some valuable are efficient. All efficient are reliable. No reliable is a innovative. All innovative are rare. Conclusions: I. Some valuable are reliable. II. No efficient is a innovative. III. Some rare are not reliable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some valuable are efficient → Partial overlap
2. All efficient are reliable → efficient inside reliable
3. No reliable is a innovative → reliable and innovative separate
4. All innovative are rare → innovative inside rare

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some valuable are reliable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No efficient is a innovative"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some rare are not reliable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 11

Statements: Some strategies are theories. All theories are ideas. No ideas is a patterns. All patterns are methods. Conclusions: I. Some strategies are ideas. II. No theories is a patterns. III. Some methods are not ideas.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some strategies are theories → Partial overlap
2. All theories are ideas → theories inside ideas
3. No ideas is a patterns → ideas and patterns separate
4. All patterns are methods → patterns inside methods

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some strategies are ideas"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No theories is a patterns"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some methods are not ideas"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 12

Statements: Some architects are writers. All writers are artists. No artists is a nurses. All nurses are doctors. Conclusions: I. Some architects are artists. II. No writers is a nurses. III. Some doctors are not artists.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some architects are writers → Partial overlap
2. All writers are artists → writers inside artists
3. No artists is a nurses → artists and nurses separate
4. All nurses are doctors → nurses inside doctors

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some architects are artists"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No writers is a nurses"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some doctors are not artists"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 13

Statements: Some fish are wild. All wild are diurnal. No diurnal is a invertebrates. All invertebrates are vertebrates. Conclusions: I. Some fish are diurnal. II. No wild is a invertebrates. III. Some vertebrates are not diurnal.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some fish are wild → Partial overlap
2. All wild are diurnal → wild inside diurnal
3. No diurnal is a invertebrates → diurnal and invertebrates separate
4. All invertebrates are vertebrates → invertebrates inside vertebrates

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some fish are diurnal"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No wild is a invertebrates"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some vertebrates are not diurnal"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 14

Statements: Some reliable are durable. All durable are sustainable. No sustainable is a useful. All useful are beautiful. Conclusions: I. Some reliable are sustainable. II. No durable is a useful. III. Some beautiful are not sustainable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some reliable are durable → Partial overlap
2. All durable are sustainable → durable inside sustainable
3. No sustainable is a useful → sustainable and useful separate
4. All useful are beautiful → useful inside beautiful

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some reliable are sustainable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No durable is a useful"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some beautiful are not sustainable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 15

Statements: Some omnivores are diurnal. All diurnal are cold-blooded. No cold-blooded is a mammals. All mammals are nocturnal. Conclusions: I. Some omnivores are cold-blooded. II. No diurnal is a mammals. III. Some nocturnal are not cold-blooded.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some omnivores are diurnal → Partial overlap
2. All diurnal are cold-blooded → diurnal inside cold-blooded
3. No cold-blooded is a mammals → cold-blooded and mammals separate
4. All mammals are nocturnal → mammals inside nocturnal

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some omnivores are cold-blooded"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No diurnal is a mammals"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some nocturnal are not cold-blooded"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 16

Statements: Some innovative are rare. All rare are beautiful. No beautiful is a valuable. All valuable are durable. Conclusions: I. Some innovative are beautiful. II. No rare is a valuable. III. Some durable are not beautiful.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some innovative are rare → Partial overlap
2. All rare are beautiful → rare inside beautiful
3. No beautiful is a valuable → beautiful and valuable separate
4. All valuable are durable → valuable inside durable

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some innovative are beautiful"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No rare is a valuable"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some durable are not beautiful"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 17

Statements: Some managers are entrepreneurs. All entrepreneurs are accountants. No accountants is a lawyers. All lawyers are musicians. Conclusions: I. Some managers are accountants. II. No entrepreneurs is a lawyers. III. Some musicians are not accountants.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some managers are entrepreneurs → Partial overlap
2. All entrepreneurs are accountants → entrepreneurs inside accountants
3. No accountants is a lawyers → accountants and lawyers separate
4. All lawyers are musicians → lawyers inside musicians

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some managers are accountants"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No entrepreneurs is a lawyers"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some musicians are not accountants"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 18

Statements: Some electronics are instruments. All instruments are ornaments. No ornaments is a gadgets. All gadgets are devices. Conclusions: I. Some electronics are ornaments. II. No instruments is a gadgets. III. Some devices are not ornaments.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some electronics are instruments → Partial overlap
2. All instruments are ornaments → instruments inside ornaments
3. No ornaments is a gadgets → ornaments and gadgets separate
4. All gadgets are devices → gadgets inside devices

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some electronics are ornaments"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No instruments is a gadgets"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some devices are not ornaments"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 19

Statements: Some ideas are patterns. All patterns are methods. No methods is a models. All models are processes. Conclusions: I. Some ideas are methods. II. No patterns is a models. III. Some processes are not methods.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some ideas are patterns → Partial overlap
2. All patterns are methods → patterns inside methods
3. No methods is a models → methods and models separate
4. All models are processes → models inside processes

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some ideas are methods"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No patterns is a models"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some processes are not methods"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 20

Statements: Some utensils are equipment. All equipment are appliances. No appliances is a devices. All devices are furniture. Conclusions: I. Some utensils are appliances. II. No equipment is a devices. III. Some furniture are not appliances.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some utensils are equipment → Partial overlap
2. All equipment are appliances → equipment inside appliances
3. No appliances is a devices → appliances and devices separate
4. All devices are furniture → devices inside furniture

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some utensils are appliances"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No equipment is a devices"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some furniture are not appliances"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet