ReasoningAbility.com

Four Statement Complex: Worksheet 6 - Intermediate-Advanced Practice Four Statement Complex INTERMEDIATE ADVANCED

Ready to master Four Statement Complex? This timed practice ⚡ worksheet (6/10) presents 20 intermediate-advanced-level challenges. Focus area: speed building. Learn to solve four statement complex tricks, handle four statement complex shortcut methods, and perfect four statement complex bank exam questions with our step-by-step solutions.

📝 Worksheet 6 of 10 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Intermediate Advanced level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Four Statement Complex
Worksheet 6 of 10 (55% complete)

Question 1

Statements: Some principles are ideas. All ideas are processes. No processes is a theories. All theories are systems. Conclusions: I. Some principles are processes. II. No ideas is a theories. III. Some systems are not processes.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some principles are ideas → Partial overlap
2. All ideas are processes → ideas inside processes
3. No processes is a theories → processes and theories separate
4. All theories are systems → theories inside systems

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some principles are processes"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No ideas is a theories"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some systems are not processes"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 2

Statements: Some useful are rare. All rare are versatile. No versatile is a innovative. All innovative are essential. Conclusions: I. Some useful are versatile. II. No rare is a innovative. III. Some essential are not versatile.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some useful are rare → Partial overlap
2. All rare are versatile → rare inside versatile
3. No versatile is a innovative → versatile and innovative separate
4. All innovative are essential → innovative inside essential

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some useful are versatile"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No rare is a innovative"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some essential are not versatile"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 3

Statements: Some patterns are models. All models are structures. No structures is a ideas. All ideas are theories. Conclusions: I. Some patterns are structures. II. No models is a ideas. III. Some theories are not structures.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some patterns are models → Partial overlap
2. All models are structures → models inside structures
3. No structures is a ideas → structures and ideas separate
4. All ideas are theories → ideas inside theories

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some patterns are structures"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No models is a ideas"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some theories are not structures"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 4

Statements: Some efficient are sustainable. All sustainable are essential. No essential is a accessible. All accessible are beautiful. Conclusions: I. Some efficient are essential. II. No sustainable is a accessible. III. Some beautiful are not essential.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some efficient are sustainable → Partial overlap
2. All sustainable are essential → sustainable inside essential
3. No essential is a accessible → essential and accessible separate
4. All accessible are beautiful → accessible inside beautiful

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some efficient are essential"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No sustainable is a accessible"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some beautiful are not essential"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 5

Statements: Some reliable are innovative. All innovative are valuable. No valuable is a accessible. All accessible are durable. Conclusions: I. Some reliable are valuable. II. No innovative is a accessible. III. Some durable are not valuable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some reliable are innovative → Partial overlap
2. All innovative are valuable → innovative inside valuable
3. No valuable is a accessible → valuable and accessible separate
4. All accessible are durable → accessible inside durable

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some reliable are valuable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No innovative is a accessible"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some durable are not valuable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 6

Statements: Some engineers are accountants. All accountants are artists. No artists is a scientists. All scientists are managers. Conclusions: I. Some engineers are artists. II. No accountants is a scientists. III. Some managers are not artists.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some engineers are accountants → Partial overlap
2. All accountants are artists → accountants inside artists
3. No artists is a scientists → artists and scientists separate
4. All scientists are managers → scientists inside managers

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some engineers are artists"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No accountants is a scientists"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some managers are not artists"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 7

Statements: Some herbivores are omnivores. All omnivores are birds. No birds is a wild. All wild are warm-blooded. Conclusions: I. Some herbivores are birds. II. No omnivores is a wild. III. Some warm-blooded are not birds.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some herbivores are omnivores → Partial overlap
2. All omnivores are birds → omnivores inside birds
3. No birds is a wild → birds and wild separate
4. All wild are warm-blooded → wild inside warm-blooded

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some herbivores are birds"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No omnivores is a wild"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some warm-blooded are not birds"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 8

Statements: Some concepts are strategies. All strategies are processes. No processes is a principles. All principles are models. Conclusions: I. Some concepts are processes. II. No strategies is a principles. III. Some models are not processes.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some concepts are strategies → Partial overlap
2. All strategies are processes → strategies inside processes
3. No processes is a principles → processes and principles separate
4. All principles are models → principles inside models

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some concepts are processes"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No strategies is a principles"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some models are not processes"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 9

Statements: Some frameworks are processes. All processes are systems. No systems is a patterns. All patterns are ideas. Conclusions: I. Some frameworks are systems. II. No processes is a patterns. III. Some ideas are not systems.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some frameworks are processes → Partial overlap
2. All processes are systems → processes inside systems
3. No systems is a patterns → systems and patterns separate
4. All patterns are ideas → patterns inside ideas

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some frameworks are systems"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No processes is a patterns"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some ideas are not systems"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 10

Statements: Some methods are principles. All principles are patterns. No patterns is a systems. All systems are theories. Conclusions: I. Some methods are patterns. II. No principles is a systems. III. Some theories are not patterns.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some methods are principles → Partial overlap
2. All principles are patterns → principles inside patterns
3. No patterns is a systems → patterns and systems separate
4. All systems are theories → systems inside theories

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some methods are patterns"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No principles is a systems"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some theories are not patterns"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 11

Statements: Some pharmacists are architects. All architects are engineers. No engineers is a nurses. All nurses are artists. Conclusions: I. Some pharmacists are engineers. II. No architects is a nurses. III. Some artists are not engineers.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some pharmacists are architects → Partial overlap
2. All architects are engineers → architects inside engineers
3. No engineers is a nurses → engineers and nurses separate
4. All nurses are artists → nurses inside artists

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some pharmacists are engineers"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No architects is a nurses"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some artists are not engineers"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 12

Statements: Some essential are rare. All rare are efficient. No efficient is a accessible. All accessible are innovative. Conclusions: I. Some essential are efficient. II. No rare is a accessible. III. Some innovative are not efficient.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some essential are rare → Partial overlap
2. All rare are efficient → rare inside efficient
3. No efficient is a accessible → efficient and accessible separate
4. All accessible are innovative → accessible inside innovative

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some essential are efficient"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No rare is a accessible"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some innovative are not efficient"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 13

Statements: Some versatile are reliable. All reliable are rare. No rare is a efficient. All efficient are accessible. Conclusions: I. Some versatile are rare. II. No reliable is a efficient. III. Some accessible are not rare.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some versatile are reliable → Partial overlap
2. All reliable are rare → reliable inside rare
3. No rare is a efficient → rare and efficient separate
4. All efficient are accessible → efficient inside accessible

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some versatile are rare"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No reliable is a efficient"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some accessible are not rare"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 14

Statements: Some efficient are versatile. All versatile are beautiful. No beautiful is a valuable. All valuable are sustainable. Conclusions: I. Some efficient are beautiful. II. No versatile is a valuable. III. Some sustainable are not beautiful.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some efficient are versatile → Partial overlap
2. All versatile are beautiful → versatile inside beautiful
3. No beautiful is a valuable → beautiful and valuable separate
4. All valuable are sustainable → valuable inside sustainable

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some efficient are beautiful"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No versatile is a valuable"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some sustainable are not beautiful"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 15

Statements: Some processes are concepts. All concepts are theories. No theories is a models. All models are methods. Conclusions: I. Some processes are theories. II. No concepts is a models. III. Some methods are not theories.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some processes are concepts → Partial overlap
2. All concepts are theories → concepts inside theories
3. No theories is a models → theories and models separate
4. All models are methods → models inside methods

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some processes are theories"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No concepts is a models"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some methods are not theories"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 16

Statements: Some scientists are accountants. All accountants are engineers. No engineers is a nurses. All nurses are architects. Conclusions: I. Some scientists are engineers. II. No accountants is a nurses. III. Some architects are not engineers.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some scientists are accountants → Partial overlap
2. All accountants are engineers → accountants inside engineers
3. No engineers is a nurses → engineers and nurses separate
4. All nurses are architects → nurses inside architects

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some scientists are engineers"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No accountants is a nurses"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some architects are not engineers"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 17

Statements: Some gadgets are devices. All devices are instruments. No instruments is a equipment. All equipment are machines. Conclusions: I. Some gadgets are instruments. II. No devices is a equipment. III. Some machines are not instruments.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some gadgets are devices → Partial overlap
2. All devices are instruments → devices inside instruments
3. No instruments is a equipment → instruments and equipment separate
4. All equipment are machines → equipment inside machines

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some gadgets are instruments"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No devices is a equipment"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some machines are not instruments"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 18

Statements: Some pilots are engineers. All engineers are lawyers. No lawyers is a artists. All artists are accountants. Conclusions: I. Some pilots are lawyers. II. No engineers is a artists. III. Some accountants are not lawyers.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some pilots are engineers → Partial overlap
2. All engineers are lawyers → engineers inside lawyers
3. No lawyers is a artists → lawyers and artists separate
4. All artists are accountants → artists inside accountants

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some pilots are lawyers"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No engineers is a artists"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some accountants are not lawyers"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 19

Statements: Some reptiles are domestic. All domestic are carnivores. No carnivores is a herbivores. All herbivores are warm-blooded. Conclusions: I. Some reptiles are carnivores. II. No domestic is a herbivores. III. Some warm-blooded are not carnivores.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some reptiles are domestic → Partial overlap
2. All domestic are carnivores → domestic inside carnivores
3. No carnivores is a herbivores → carnivores and herbivores separate
4. All herbivores are warm-blooded → herbivores inside warm-blooded

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some reptiles are carnivores"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No domestic is a herbivores"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some warm-blooded are not carnivores"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 20

Statements: Some frameworks are patterns. All patterns are theories. No theories is a models. All models are strategies. Conclusions: I. Some frameworks are theories. II. No patterns is a models. III. Some strategies are not theories.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some frameworks are patterns → Partial overlap
2. All patterns are theories → patterns inside theories
3. No theories is a models → theories and models separate
4. All models are strategies → models inside strategies

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some frameworks are theories"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No patterns is a models"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some strategies are not theories"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet