Statement-Argument - Intermediate-Advanced Level: argument strength INTERMEDIATE-ADVANCED

Intensive strategic solving 🎯 drill: 20 intermediate-advanced-level statement-argument questions. Worksheet 20 of 30 hones your argument strength abilities. Practice counter arguments, evidence assessment, logical fallacies under timed conditions. Best for advanced developing students seeking advanced concepts with increasing complexity.

📝 Worksheet 20 of 30 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Intermediate-advanced level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Statement-Argument
Worksheet 20 of 30 (66% complete)

Question 1

Statement: 'If we allow students to retake exams, soon they'll expect to retake them indefinitely' What logical fallacy does this argument contain?
This assumes one action will inevitably lead to extreme consequences without evidence

Question 2

Original Argument: Artificial intelligence will solve most of humanity's problems through automation and optimization Which counterargument most effectively challenges this position?
This directly challenges the premise by showing how AI might create more problems than it solves

Question 3

Statement: Should the city build more public parks? Argument: Yes, public parks improve community health and well-being Is this argument strong or weak?
Strong - directly addresses health benefits with clear reasoning

Question 4

Text: 'Studies show, experts agree, and data confirms that this policy will benefit everyone' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
References expertise multiple times using parallel structure for emphasis

Question 5

Analyze this argument: All successful entrepreneurs take calculated risks. Maria takes calculated risks. Therefore, Maria is a successful entrepreneur. What is the logical structure?
The logic is flawed: just because successful entrepreneurs take risks doesn't mean all risk-takers are successful entrepreneurs

Question 6

Argument: School uniforms improve student discipline because they reduce clothing-related distractions and peer pressure. Which piece of evidence is LEAST relevant to evaluating this argument?
This evidence is neutral because it doesn't address the core causal claim about productivity/discipline/value, focusing instead on tangential factors.

Question 7

Text: 'Studies show, experts agree, and data confirms that this policy will benefit everyone' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
References expertise multiple times using parallel structure for emphasis

Question 8

Argument: College education is no longer worth the cost because tuition has risen faster than inflation while starting salaries have stagnated. Which new evidence would MOST weaken this argument?
This weakens the argument by providing contradictory evidence or showing the claimed relationship doesn't hold.

Question 9

Argument: Four-day work weeks increase productivity because employees are more refreshed and focused when working fewer days. Which new evidence would MOST weaken this argument?
This weakens the argument by providing contradictory evidence or showing the claimed relationship doesn't hold.

Question 10

Statement: Should the city build more public parks? Argument: No, because I don't like outdoor activities Is this argument strong or weak?
Weak - personal preference doesn't constitute public policy argument

Question 11

Statement: 'If we allow students to retake exams, soon they'll expect to retake them indefinitely' What logical fallacy does this argument contain?
This assumes one action will inevitably lead to extreme consequences without evidence

Question 12

Argument: School uniforms improve student discipline because they reduce clothing-related distractions and peer pressure. Which new piece of evidence would MOST strengthen this argument?
This strengthens the argument by providing direct empirical support that confirms the claimed causal relationship.

Question 13

Original Argument: Artificial intelligence will solve most of humanity's problems through automation and optimization Which counterargument most effectively challenges this position?
This directly challenges the premise by showing how AI might create more problems than it solves

Question 14

Text: 'We face a choice: either we act now with courage, or we abandon our principles and accept failure' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
Presents only two extreme options while using emotionally charged terms

Question 15

Statement: 'Everyone I know supports this policy, so it must be the right thing to do' What logical fallacy does this argument contain?
The argument assumes something is correct because many people believe it

Question 16

Analyze this argument: Either we increase taxes or we cut public services. We cannot increase taxes. Therefore, we must cut public services. What is the logical structure?
This follows valid logical form: given two alternatives and eliminating one, the other must follow

Question 17

Claim: Remote work increases employee productivity Evidence: Meta-analysis of 100 studies on remote work productivity How would you rate the quality of this evidence?
Comprehensive review of multiple studies provides strong evidence

Question 18

Claim: Regular exercise improves mental health Evidence: My friend feels better after going to the gym How would you rate the quality of this evidence?
Personal anecdote, not generalizable or scientifically valid

Question 19

Text: 'We face a choice: either we act now with courage, or we abandon our principles and accept failure' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
Presents only two extreme options while using emotionally charged terms

Question 20

Text: 'Just as a doctor wouldn't ignore symptoms of disease, we cannot ignore the symptoms of economic decline' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
Creates comparison between familiar medical concept and abstract economic situation
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet