Statement-Argument - Intermediate Level: fact vs opinion INTERMEDIATE

Exam-focused quick response training ★ worksheet: 20 intermediate-level statement-argument questions. Worksheet 13 of 30 targets fact vs opinion. Build proficiency in counter arguments, evidence assessment, logical fallacies with detailed solutions. Ideal for mid-level competitive exam preparation.

📝 Worksheet 13 of 30 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Intermediate level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Statement-Argument
Worksheet 13 of 30 (43% complete)

Question 1

Argument: Four-day work weeks increase productivity because employees are more refreshed and focused when working fewer days. Which new evidence would MOST weaken this argument?
This weakens the argument by providing contradictory evidence or showing the claimed relationship doesn't hold.

Question 2

Statement: Should the city build more public parks? Argument: No, parks are expensive to maintain Is this argument strong or weak?
Strong - financial sustainability is a valid policy concern

Question 3

Analyze this argument: If the economy improves, unemployment will decrease. Unemployment has decreased. Therefore, the economy has improved. What is the logical structure?
Unemployment could decrease for reasons other than economic improvement

Question 4

Text: 'Studies show, experts agree, and data confirms that this policy will benefit everyone' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
References expertise multiple times using parallel structure for emphasis

Question 5

Analyze this argument: All successful entrepreneurs take calculated risks. Maria takes calculated risks. Therefore, Maria is a successful entrepreneur. What is the logical structure?
The logic is flawed: just because successful entrepreneurs take risks doesn't mean all risk-takers are successful entrepreneurs

Question 6

Original Argument: Online learning is superior to classroom learning because it's more flexible and cost-effective Which counterargument most effectively challenges this position?
This addresses a fundamental educational need that online learning struggles to replicate

Question 7

Text: 'Studies show, experts agree, and data confirms that this policy will benefit everyone' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
References expertise multiple times using parallel structure for emphasis

Question 8

Text: 'Are we going to stand by while our children's future is destroyed by inaction on climate change?' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
Uses a rhetorical question to engage audience and appeals to parental concerns for emotional impact

Question 9

Statement: 'Everyone I know supports this policy, so it must be the right thing to do' What logical fallacy does this argument contain?
The argument assumes something is correct because many people believe it

Question 10

Statement: 'You can't prove that this new medicine is completely safe, so we shouldn't use it' What logical fallacy does this argument contain?
This assumes something is false because it can't be proven true

Question 11

Original Argument: Artificial intelligence will solve most of humanity's problems through automation and optimization Which counterargument most effectively challenges this position?
This directly challenges the premise by showing how AI might create more problems than it solves

Question 12

Claim: Remote work increases employee productivity Evidence: A Twitter poll showing people feel more productive at home How would you rate the quality of this evidence?
Social media polls lack scientific rigor and proper sampling

Question 13

Text: 'We face a choice: either we act now with courage, or we abandon our principles and accept failure' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
Presents only two extreme options while using emotionally charged terms

Question 14

Argument: School uniforms improve student discipline because they reduce clothing-related distractions and peer pressure. Which piece of evidence is LEAST relevant to evaluating this argument?
This evidence is neutral because it doesn't address the core causal claim about productivity/discipline/value, focusing instead on tangential factors.

Question 15

Analyze this argument: No birds are mammals. All bats are mammals. Therefore, no bats are birds. What is the logical structure?
This follows valid logical form with properly distributed terms

Question 16

Statement: 'If we allow students to retake exams, soon they'll expect to retake them indefinitely' What logical fallacy does this argument contain?
This assumes one action will inevitably lead to extreme consequences without evidence

Question 17

Original Argument: All doctors are educated. Some educated people are rich. Therefore, some doctors are rich. Which argument has the SAME logical structure as the original?
The original argument has the structure: All A are B. Some B are C. Therefore, some A are C.. The correct parallel follows this exact logical pattern, while distractors use different reasoning patterns (quantifier differences, different logical forms, or valid/invalid variations).

Question 18

Text: 'Just as a doctor wouldn't ignore symptoms of disease, we cannot ignore the symptoms of economic decline' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
Creates comparison between familiar medical concept and abstract economic situation

Question 19

Analyze this argument: No birds are mammals. All bats are mammals. Therefore, no bats are birds. What is the logical structure?
This follows valid logical form with properly distributed terms

Question 20

Argument: Four-day work weeks increase productivity because employees are more refreshed and focused when working fewer days. Which new evidence would MOST weaken this argument?
This weakens the argument by providing contradictory evidence or showing the claimed relationship doesn't hold.
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet