ReasoningAbility.com

Three Statement Standard Beginner-Intermediate Worksheet: Focus on common variations practice Three Statement Standard BEGINNER INTERMEDIATE

Level up your Three Statement Standard skills! You're at Worksheet 4 of 10 (33% through this series). This step-up challenge worksheet features 20 beginner-intermediate-level problems with a focus on common variations practice. Topics covered: three statement standard for competitive exams, how to solve three statement standard, three statement standard tricks.

📝 Worksheet 4 of 10 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Beginner Intermediate level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Three Statement Standard
Worksheet 4 of 10 (33% complete)

Question 1

Statements: All musicians are pharmacists. Some pharmacists are teachers. No teachers is a accountants. Conclusions: I. Some musicians are not accountants. II. Some pharmacists are not accountants. III. No accountants is a teachers.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All musicians are pharmacists → musicians inside pharmacists
Statement 2: Some pharmacists are teachers → pharmacists and teachers overlap
Statement 3: No teachers is a accountants → teachers and accountants separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some musicians are not accountants"
Cannot determine relationship between musicians and accountants - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some pharmacists are not accountants"
Some pharmacists are teachers (given) + No teachers is accountants (given)
Those pharmacists which are teachers cannot be accountants - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No accountants is a teachers"
Conversion of "No teachers is a accountants" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 2

Statements: All carnivores are amphibians. Some amphibians are herbivores. No herbivores is a nocturnal. Conclusions: I. Some carnivores are not nocturnal. II. Some amphibians are not nocturnal. III. No nocturnal is a herbivores.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All carnivores are amphibians → carnivores inside amphibians
Statement 2: Some amphibians are herbivores → amphibians and herbivores overlap
Statement 3: No herbivores is a nocturnal → herbivores and nocturnal separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some carnivores are not nocturnal"
Cannot determine relationship between carnivores and nocturnal - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some amphibians are not nocturnal"
Some amphibians are herbivores (given) + No herbivores is nocturnal (given)
Those amphibians which are herbivores cannot be nocturnal - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No nocturnal is a herbivores"
Conversion of "No herbivores is a nocturnal" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 3

Statements: All innovative are beautiful. Some beautiful are versatile. No versatile is a essential. Conclusions: I. Some innovative are not essential. II. Some beautiful are not essential. III. No essential is a versatile.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All innovative are beautiful → innovative inside beautiful
Statement 2: Some beautiful are versatile → beautiful and versatile overlap
Statement 3: No versatile is a essential → versatile and essential separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some innovative are not essential"
Cannot determine relationship between innovative and essential - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some beautiful are not essential"
Some beautiful are versatile (given) + No versatile is essential (given)
Those beautiful which are versatile cannot be essential - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No essential is a versatile"
Conversion of "No versatile is a essential" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 4

Statements: All furniture are vehicles. Some vehicles are ornaments. No ornaments is a devices. Conclusions: I. Some furniture are not devices. II. Some vehicles are not devices. III. No devices is a ornaments.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All furniture are vehicles → furniture inside vehicles
Statement 2: Some vehicles are ornaments → vehicles and ornaments overlap
Statement 3: No ornaments is a devices → ornaments and devices separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some furniture are not devices"
Cannot determine relationship between furniture and devices - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some vehicles are not devices"
Some vehicles are ornaments (given) + No ornaments is devices (given)
Those vehicles which are ornaments cannot be devices - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No devices is a ornaments"
Conversion of "No ornaments is a devices" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 5

Statements: All ornaments are gadgets. Some gadgets are instruments. No instruments is a devices. Conclusions: I. Some ornaments are not devices. II. Some gadgets are not devices. III. No devices is a instruments.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All ornaments are gadgets → ornaments inside gadgets
Statement 2: Some gadgets are instruments → gadgets and instruments overlap
Statement 3: No instruments is a devices → instruments and devices separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some ornaments are not devices"
Cannot determine relationship between ornaments and devices - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some gadgets are not devices"
Some gadgets are instruments (given) + No instruments is devices (given)
Those gadgets which are instruments cannot be devices - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No devices is a instruments"
Conversion of "No instruments is a devices" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 6

Statements: All gadgets are ornaments. Some ornaments are equipment. No equipment is a utensils. Conclusions: I. Some gadgets are not utensils. II. Some ornaments are not utensils. III. No utensils is a equipment.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All gadgets are ornaments → gadgets inside ornaments
Statement 2: Some ornaments are equipment → ornaments and equipment overlap
Statement 3: No equipment is a utensils → equipment and utensils separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some gadgets are not utensils"
Cannot determine relationship between gadgets and utensils - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some ornaments are not utensils"
Some ornaments are equipment (given) + No equipment is utensils (given)
Those ornaments which are equipment cannot be utensils - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No utensils is a equipment"
Conversion of "No equipment is a utensils" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 7

Statements: All concepts are strategies. Some strategies are systems. No systems is a structures. Conclusions: I. Some concepts are not structures. II. Some strategies are not structures. III. No structures is a systems.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All concepts are strategies → concepts inside strategies
Statement 2: Some strategies are systems → strategies and systems overlap
Statement 3: No systems is a structures → systems and structures separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some concepts are not structures"
Cannot determine relationship between concepts and structures - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some strategies are not structures"
Some strategies are systems (given) + No systems is structures (given)
Those strategies which are systems cannot be structures - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No structures is a systems"
Conversion of "No systems is a structures" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 8

Statements: All furniture are gadgets. Some gadgets are vehicles. No vehicles is a machines. Conclusions: I. Some furniture are not machines. II. Some gadgets are not machines. III. No machines is a vehicles.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All furniture are gadgets → furniture inside gadgets
Statement 2: Some gadgets are vehicles → gadgets and vehicles overlap
Statement 3: No vehicles is a machines → vehicles and machines separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some furniture are not machines"
Cannot determine relationship between furniture and machines - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some gadgets are not machines"
Some gadgets are vehicles (given) + No vehicles is machines (given)
Those gadgets which are vehicles cannot be machines - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No machines is a vehicles"
Conversion of "No vehicles is a machines" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 9

Statements: All diurnal are birds. Some birds are amphibians. No amphibians is a herbivores. Conclusions: I. Some diurnal are not herbivores. II. Some birds are not herbivores. III. No herbivores is a amphibians.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All diurnal are birds → diurnal inside birds
Statement 2: Some birds are amphibians → birds and amphibians overlap
Statement 3: No amphibians is a herbivores → amphibians and herbivores separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some diurnal are not herbivores"
Cannot determine relationship between diurnal and herbivores - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some birds are not herbivores"
Some birds are amphibians (given) + No amphibians is herbivores (given)
Those birds which are amphibians cannot be herbivores - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No herbivores is a amphibians"
Conversion of "No amphibians is a herbivores" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 10

Statements: All innovative are beautiful. Some beautiful are essential. No essential is a versatile. Conclusions: I. Some innovative are not versatile. II. Some beautiful are not versatile. III. No versatile is a essential.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All innovative are beautiful → innovative inside beautiful
Statement 2: Some beautiful are essential → beautiful and essential overlap
Statement 3: No essential is a versatile → essential and versatile separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some innovative are not versatile"
Cannot determine relationship between innovative and versatile - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some beautiful are not versatile"
Some beautiful are essential (given) + No essential is versatile (given)
Those beautiful which are essential cannot be versatile - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No versatile is a essential"
Conversion of "No essential is a versatile" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 11

Statements: All tools are utensils. Some utensils are electronics. No electronics is a vehicles. Conclusions: I. Some tools are not vehicles. II. Some utensils are not vehicles. III. No vehicles is a electronics.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All tools are utensils → tools inside utensils
Statement 2: Some utensils are electronics → utensils and electronics overlap
Statement 3: No electronics is a vehicles → electronics and vehicles separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some tools are not vehicles"
Cannot determine relationship between tools and vehicles - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some utensils are not vehicles"
Some utensils are electronics (given) + No electronics is vehicles (given)
Those utensils which are electronics cannot be vehicles - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No vehicles is a electronics"
Conversion of "No electronics is a vehicles" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 12

Statements: All artists are teachers. Some teachers are entrepreneurs. No entrepreneurs is a scientists. Conclusions: I. Some artists are not scientists. II. Some teachers are not scientists. III. No scientists is a entrepreneurs.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All artists are teachers → artists inside teachers
Statement 2: Some teachers are entrepreneurs → teachers and entrepreneurs overlap
Statement 3: No entrepreneurs is a scientists → entrepreneurs and scientists separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some artists are not scientists"
Cannot determine relationship between artists and scientists - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some teachers are not scientists"
Some teachers are entrepreneurs (given) + No entrepreneurs is scientists (given)
Those teachers which are entrepreneurs cannot be scientists - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No scientists is a entrepreneurs"
Conversion of "No entrepreneurs is a scientists" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 13

Statements: All sustainable are reliable. Some reliable are useful. No useful is a innovative. Conclusions: I. Some sustainable are not innovative. II. Some reliable are not innovative. III. No innovative is a useful.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All sustainable are reliable → sustainable inside reliable
Statement 2: Some reliable are useful → reliable and useful overlap
Statement 3: No useful is a innovative → useful and innovative separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some sustainable are not innovative"
Cannot determine relationship between sustainable and innovative - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some reliable are not innovative"
Some reliable are useful (given) + No useful is innovative (given)
Those reliable which are useful cannot be innovative - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No innovative is a useful"
Conversion of "No useful is a innovative" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 14

Statements: All processes are methods. Some methods are strategies. No strategies is a models. Conclusions: I. Some processes are not models. II. Some methods are not models. III. No models is a strategies.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All processes are methods → processes inside methods
Statement 2: Some methods are strategies → methods and strategies overlap
Statement 3: No strategies is a models → strategies and models separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some processes are not models"
Cannot determine relationship between processes and models - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some methods are not models"
Some methods are strategies (given) + No strategies is models (given)
Those methods which are strategies cannot be models - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No models is a strategies"
Conversion of "No strategies is a models" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 15

Statements: All essential are durable. Some durable are beautiful. No beautiful is a reliable. Conclusions: I. Some essential are not reliable. II. Some durable are not reliable. III. No reliable is a beautiful.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All essential are durable → essential inside durable
Statement 2: Some durable are beautiful → durable and beautiful overlap
Statement 3: No beautiful is a reliable → beautiful and reliable separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some essential are not reliable"
Cannot determine relationship between essential and reliable - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some durable are not reliable"
Some durable are beautiful (given) + No beautiful is reliable (given)
Those durable which are beautiful cannot be reliable - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No reliable is a beautiful"
Conversion of "No beautiful is a reliable" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 16

Statements: All reptiles are herbivores. Some herbivores are carnivores. No carnivores is a warm-blooded. Conclusions: I. Some reptiles are not warm-blooded. II. Some herbivores are not warm-blooded. III. No warm-blooded is a carnivores.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All reptiles are herbivores → reptiles inside herbivores
Statement 2: Some herbivores are carnivores → herbivores and carnivores overlap
Statement 3: No carnivores is a warm-blooded → carnivores and warm-blooded separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some reptiles are not warm-blooded"
Cannot determine relationship between reptiles and warm-blooded - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some herbivores are not warm-blooded"
Some herbivores are carnivores (given) + No carnivores is warm-blooded (given)
Those herbivores which are carnivores cannot be warm-blooded - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No warm-blooded is a carnivores"
Conversion of "No carnivores is a warm-blooded" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 17

Statements: All carnivores are mammals. Some mammals are domestic. No domestic is a wild. Conclusions: I. Some carnivores are not wild. II. Some mammals are not wild. III. No wild is a domestic.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All carnivores are mammals → carnivores inside mammals
Statement 2: Some mammals are domestic → mammals and domestic overlap
Statement 3: No domestic is a wild → domestic and wild separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some carnivores are not wild"
Cannot determine relationship between carnivores and wild - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some mammals are not wild"
Some mammals are domestic (given) + No domestic is wild (given)
Those mammals which are domestic cannot be wild - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No wild is a domestic"
Conversion of "No domestic is a wild" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 18

Statements: All versatile are reliable. Some reliable are accessible. No accessible is a valuable. Conclusions: I. Some versatile are not valuable. II. Some reliable are not valuable. III. No valuable is a accessible.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All versatile are reliable → versatile inside reliable
Statement 2: Some reliable are accessible → reliable and accessible overlap
Statement 3: No accessible is a valuable → accessible and valuable separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some versatile are not valuable"
Cannot determine relationship between versatile and valuable - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some reliable are not valuable"
Some reliable are accessible (given) + No accessible is valuable (given)
Those reliable which are accessible cannot be valuable - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No valuable is a accessible"
Conversion of "No accessible is a valuable" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 19

Statements: All wild are domestic. Some domestic are mammals. No mammals is a diurnal. Conclusions: I. Some wild are not diurnal. II. Some domestic are not diurnal. III. No diurnal is a mammals.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All wild are domestic → wild inside domestic
Statement 2: Some domestic are mammals → domestic and mammals overlap
Statement 3: No mammals is a diurnal → mammals and diurnal separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some wild are not diurnal"
Cannot determine relationship between wild and diurnal - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some domestic are not diurnal"
Some domestic are mammals (given) + No mammals is diurnal (given)
Those domestic which are mammals cannot be diurnal - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No diurnal is a mammals"
Conversion of "No mammals is a diurnal" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow

Question 20

Statements: All vertebrates are herbivores. Some herbivores are fish. No fish is a diurnal. Conclusions: I. Some vertebrates are not diurnal. II. Some herbivores are not diurnal. III. No diurnal is a fish.
Step-by-Step Analysis:

Statement 1: All vertebrates are herbivores → vertebrates inside herbivores
Statement 2: Some herbivores are fish → herbivores and fish overlap
Statement 3: No fish is a diurnal → fish and diurnal separate

Checking Conclusions:

✗ Conclusion I: "Some vertebrates are not diurnal"
Cannot determine relationship between vertebrates and diurnal - NOT PROVEN

✓ Conclusion II: "Some herbivores are not diurnal"
Some herbivores are fish (given) + No fish is diurnal (given)
Those herbivores which are fish cannot be diurnal - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "No diurnal is a fish"
Conversion of "No fish is a diurnal" - FOLLOWS

Answer: Conclusions II and III follow
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet