ReasoningAbility.com

Four Statement Complex Beginner-Intermediate Worksheet: Focus on common variations practice Four Statement Complex BEGINNER INTERMEDIATE

Level up your Four Statement Complex skills! You're at Worksheet 4 of 10 (33% through this series). This step-up challenge worksheet features 20 beginner-intermediate-level problems with a focus on common variations practice. Topics covered: four statement complex for competitive exams, how to solve four statement complex, four statement complex tricks.

📝 Worksheet 4 of 10 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Beginner Intermediate level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Four Statement Complex
Worksheet 4 of 10 (33% complete)

Question 1

Statements: Some methods are frameworks. All frameworks are theories. No theories is a models. All models are systems. Conclusions: I. Some methods are theories. II. No frameworks is a models. III. Some systems are not theories.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some methods are frameworks → Partial overlap
2. All frameworks are theories → frameworks inside theories
3. No theories is a models → theories and models separate
4. All models are systems → models inside systems

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some methods are theories"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No frameworks is a models"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some systems are not theories"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 2

Statements: Some mammals are domestic. All domestic are diurnal. No diurnal is a birds. All birds are carnivores. Conclusions: I. Some mammals are diurnal. II. No domestic is a birds. III. Some carnivores are not diurnal.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some mammals are domestic → Partial overlap
2. All domestic are diurnal → domestic inside diurnal
3. No diurnal is a birds → diurnal and birds separate
4. All birds are carnivores → birds inside carnivores

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some mammals are diurnal"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No domestic is a birds"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some carnivores are not diurnal"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 3

Statements: Some principles are processes. All processes are frameworks. No frameworks is a strategies. All strategies are concepts. Conclusions: I. Some principles are frameworks. II. No processes is a strategies. III. Some concepts are not frameworks.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some principles are processes → Partial overlap
2. All processes are frameworks → processes inside frameworks
3. No frameworks is a strategies → frameworks and strategies separate
4. All strategies are concepts → strategies inside concepts

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some principles are frameworks"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No processes is a strategies"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some concepts are not frameworks"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 4

Statements: Some rare are essential. All essential are efficient. No efficient is a durable. All durable are beautiful. Conclusions: I. Some rare are efficient. II. No essential is a durable. III. Some beautiful are not efficient.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some rare are essential → Partial overlap
2. All essential are efficient → essential inside efficient
3. No efficient is a durable → efficient and durable separate
4. All durable are beautiful → durable inside beautiful

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some rare are efficient"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No essential is a durable"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some beautiful are not efficient"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 5

Statements: Some herbivores are cold-blooded. All cold-blooded are diurnal. No diurnal is a invertebrates. All invertebrates are mammals. Conclusions: I. Some herbivores are diurnal. II. No cold-blooded is a invertebrates. III. Some mammals are not diurnal.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some herbivores are cold-blooded → Partial overlap
2. All cold-blooded are diurnal → cold-blooded inside diurnal
3. No diurnal is a invertebrates → diurnal and invertebrates separate
4. All invertebrates are mammals → invertebrates inside mammals

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some herbivores are diurnal"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No cold-blooded is a invertebrates"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some mammals are not diurnal"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 6

Statements: Some concepts are strategies. All strategies are theories. No theories is a models. All models are ideas. Conclusions: I. Some concepts are theories. II. No strategies is a models. III. Some ideas are not theories.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some concepts are strategies → Partial overlap
2. All strategies are theories → strategies inside theories
3. No theories is a models → theories and models separate
4. All models are ideas → models inside ideas

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some concepts are theories"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No strategies is a models"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some ideas are not theories"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 7

Statements: Some domestic are cold-blooded. All cold-blooded are invertebrates. No invertebrates is a fish. All fish are herbivores. Conclusions: I. Some domestic are invertebrates. II. No cold-blooded is a fish. III. Some herbivores are not invertebrates.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some domestic are cold-blooded → Partial overlap
2. All cold-blooded are invertebrates → cold-blooded inside invertebrates
3. No invertebrates is a fish → invertebrates and fish separate
4. All fish are herbivores → fish inside herbivores

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some domestic are invertebrates"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No cold-blooded is a fish"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some herbivores are not invertebrates"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 8

Statements: Some wild are amphibians. All amphibians are warm-blooded. No warm-blooded is a omnivores. All omnivores are reptiles. Conclusions: I. Some wild are warm-blooded. II. No amphibians is a omnivores. III. Some reptiles are not warm-blooded.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some wild are amphibians → Partial overlap
2. All amphibians are warm-blooded → amphibians inside warm-blooded
3. No warm-blooded is a omnivores → warm-blooded and omnivores separate
4. All omnivores are reptiles → omnivores inside reptiles

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some wild are warm-blooded"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No amphibians is a omnivores"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some reptiles are not warm-blooded"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 9

Statements: Some theories are patterns. All patterns are processes. No processes is a methods. All methods are principles. Conclusions: I. Some theories are processes. II. No patterns is a methods. III. Some principles are not processes.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some theories are patterns → Partial overlap
2. All patterns are processes → patterns inside processes
3. No processes is a methods → processes and methods separate
4. All methods are principles → methods inside principles

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some theories are processes"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No patterns is a methods"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some principles are not processes"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 10

Statements: Some instruments are furniture. All furniture are devices. No devices is a equipment. All equipment are electronics. Conclusions: I. Some instruments are devices. II. No furniture is a equipment. III. Some electronics are not devices.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some instruments are furniture → Partial overlap
2. All furniture are devices → furniture inside devices
3. No devices is a equipment → devices and equipment separate
4. All equipment are electronics → equipment inside electronics

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some instruments are devices"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No furniture is a equipment"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some electronics are not devices"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 11

Statements: Some strategies are frameworks. All frameworks are concepts. No concepts is a systems. All systems are models. Conclusions: I. Some strategies are concepts. II. No frameworks is a systems. III. Some models are not concepts.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some strategies are frameworks → Partial overlap
2. All frameworks are concepts → frameworks inside concepts
3. No concepts is a systems → concepts and systems separate
4. All systems are models → systems inside models

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some strategies are concepts"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No frameworks is a systems"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some models are not concepts"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 12

Statements: Some pharmacists are entrepreneurs. All entrepreneurs are lawyers. No lawyers is a architects. All architects are scientists. Conclusions: I. Some pharmacists are lawyers. II. No entrepreneurs is a architects. III. Some scientists are not lawyers.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some pharmacists are entrepreneurs → Partial overlap
2. All entrepreneurs are lawyers → entrepreneurs inside lawyers
3. No lawyers is a architects → lawyers and architects separate
4. All architects are scientists → architects inside scientists

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some pharmacists are lawyers"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No entrepreneurs is a architects"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some scientists are not lawyers"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 13

Statements: Some tools are devices. All devices are vehicles. No vehicles is a gadgets. All gadgets are equipment. Conclusions: I. Some tools are vehicles. II. No devices is a gadgets. III. Some equipment are not vehicles.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some tools are devices → Partial overlap
2. All devices are vehicles → devices inside vehicles
3. No vehicles is a gadgets → vehicles and gadgets separate
4. All gadgets are equipment → gadgets inside equipment

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some tools are vehicles"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No devices is a gadgets"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some equipment are not vehicles"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 14

Statements: Some pharmacists are engineers. All engineers are lawyers. No lawyers is a athletes. All athletes are accountants. Conclusions: I. Some pharmacists are lawyers. II. No engineers is a athletes. III. Some accountants are not lawyers.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some pharmacists are engineers → Partial overlap
2. All engineers are lawyers → engineers inside lawyers
3. No lawyers is a athletes → lawyers and athletes separate
4. All athletes are accountants → athletes inside accountants

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some pharmacists are lawyers"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No engineers is a athletes"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some accountants are not lawyers"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 15

Statements: Some processes are frameworks. All frameworks are systems. No systems is a models. All models are ideas. Conclusions: I. Some processes are systems. II. No frameworks is a models. III. Some ideas are not systems.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some processes are frameworks → Partial overlap
2. All frameworks are systems → frameworks inside systems
3. No systems is a models → systems and models separate
4. All models are ideas → models inside ideas

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some processes are systems"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No frameworks is a models"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some ideas are not systems"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 16

Statements: Some sustainable are innovative. All innovative are efficient. No efficient is a accessible. All accessible are reliable. Conclusions: I. Some sustainable are efficient. II. No innovative is a accessible. III. Some reliable are not efficient.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some sustainable are innovative → Partial overlap
2. All innovative are efficient → innovative inside efficient
3. No efficient is a accessible → efficient and accessible separate
4. All accessible are reliable → accessible inside reliable

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some sustainable are efficient"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No innovative is a accessible"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some reliable are not efficient"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 17

Statements: Some herbivores are nocturnal. All nocturnal are cold-blooded. No cold-blooded is a invertebrates. All invertebrates are amphibians. Conclusions: I. Some herbivores are cold-blooded. II. No nocturnal is a invertebrates. III. Some amphibians are not cold-blooded.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some herbivores are nocturnal → Partial overlap
2. All nocturnal are cold-blooded → nocturnal inside cold-blooded
3. No cold-blooded is a invertebrates → cold-blooded and invertebrates separate
4. All invertebrates are amphibians → invertebrates inside amphibians

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some herbivores are cold-blooded"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No nocturnal is a invertebrates"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some amphibians are not cold-blooded"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 18

Statements: Some wild are mammals. All mammals are warm-blooded. No warm-blooded is a reptiles. All reptiles are amphibians. Conclusions: I. Some wild are warm-blooded. II. No mammals is a reptiles. III. Some amphibians are not warm-blooded.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some wild are mammals → Partial overlap
2. All mammals are warm-blooded → mammals inside warm-blooded
3. No warm-blooded is a reptiles → warm-blooded and reptiles separate
4. All reptiles are amphibians → reptiles inside amphibians

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some wild are warm-blooded"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No mammals is a reptiles"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some amphibians are not warm-blooded"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 19

Statements: Some vertebrates are wild. All wild are invertebrates. No invertebrates is a fish. All fish are cold-blooded. Conclusions: I. Some vertebrates are invertebrates. II. No wild is a fish. III. Some cold-blooded are not invertebrates.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some vertebrates are wild → Partial overlap
2. All wild are invertebrates → wild inside invertebrates
3. No invertebrates is a fish → invertebrates and fish separate
4. All fish are cold-blooded → fish inside cold-blooded

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some vertebrates are invertebrates"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No wild is a fish"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some cold-blooded are not invertebrates"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 20

Statements: Some herbivores are invertebrates. All invertebrates are vertebrates. No vertebrates is a warm-blooded. All warm-blooded are fish. Conclusions: I. Some herbivores are vertebrates. II. No invertebrates is a warm-blooded. III. Some fish are not vertebrates.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some herbivores are invertebrates → Partial overlap
2. All invertebrates are vertebrates → invertebrates inside vertebrates
3. No vertebrates is a warm-blooded → vertebrates and warm-blooded separate
4. All warm-blooded are fish → warm-blooded inside fish

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some herbivores are vertebrates"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No invertebrates is a warm-blooded"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some fish are not vertebrates"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet