ReasoningAbility.com

Four Statement Complex: Worksheet 2 - Beginner Practice Four Statement Complex BEGINNER

Ready to master Four Statement Complex? This entry level practice worksheet (2/10) presents 20 beginner-level challenges. Focus area: pattern recognition. Learn to solve four statement complex reasoning questions, handle four statement complex practice, and perfect four statement complex for competitive exams with our step-by-step solutions.

📝 Worksheet 2 of 10 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Beginner level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Four Statement Complex
Worksheet 2 of 10 (11% complete)

Question 1

Statements: Some domestic are wild. All wild are mammals. No mammals is a diurnal. All diurnal are amphibians. Conclusions: I. Some domestic are mammals. II. No wild is a diurnal. III. Some amphibians are not mammals.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some domestic are wild → Partial overlap
2. All wild are mammals → wild inside mammals
3. No mammals is a diurnal → mammals and diurnal separate
4. All diurnal are amphibians → diurnal inside amphibians

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some domestic are mammals"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No wild is a diurnal"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some amphibians are not mammals"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 2

Statements: Some sustainable are durable. All durable are beautiful. No beautiful is a essential. All essential are rare. Conclusions: I. Some sustainable are beautiful. II. No durable is a essential. III. Some rare are not beautiful.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some sustainable are durable → Partial overlap
2. All durable are beautiful → durable inside beautiful
3. No beautiful is a essential → beautiful and essential separate
4. All essential are rare → essential inside rare

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some sustainable are beautiful"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No durable is a essential"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some rare are not beautiful"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 3

Statements: Some vehicles are machines. All machines are furniture. No furniture is a electronics. All electronics are tools. Conclusions: I. Some vehicles are furniture. II. No machines is a electronics. III. Some tools are not furniture.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some vehicles are machines → Partial overlap
2. All machines are furniture → machines inside furniture
3. No furniture is a electronics → furniture and electronics separate
4. All electronics are tools → electronics inside tools

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some vehicles are furniture"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No machines is a electronics"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some tools are not furniture"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 4

Statements: Some versatile are valuable. All valuable are reliable. No reliable is a durable. All durable are innovative. Conclusions: I. Some versatile are reliable. II. No valuable is a durable. III. Some innovative are not reliable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some versatile are valuable → Partial overlap
2. All valuable are reliable → valuable inside reliable
3. No reliable is a durable → reliable and durable separate
4. All durable are innovative → durable inside innovative

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some versatile are reliable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No valuable is a durable"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some innovative are not reliable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 5

Statements: Some useful are efficient. All efficient are reliable. No reliable is a beautiful. All beautiful are durable. Conclusions: I. Some useful are reliable. II. No efficient is a beautiful. III. Some durable are not reliable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some useful are efficient → Partial overlap
2. All efficient are reliable → efficient inside reliable
3. No reliable is a beautiful → reliable and beautiful separate
4. All beautiful are durable → beautiful inside durable

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some useful are reliable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No efficient is a beautiful"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some durable are not reliable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 6

Statements: Some equipment are devices. All devices are instruments. No instruments is a appliances. All appliances are ornaments. Conclusions: I. Some equipment are instruments. II. No devices is a appliances. III. Some ornaments are not instruments.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some equipment are devices → Partial overlap
2. All devices are instruments → devices inside instruments
3. No instruments is a appliances → instruments and appliances separate
4. All appliances are ornaments → appliances inside ornaments

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some equipment are instruments"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No devices is a appliances"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some ornaments are not instruments"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 7

Statements: Some instruments are machines. All machines are vehicles. No vehicles is a utensils. All utensils are tools. Conclusions: I. Some instruments are vehicles. II. No machines is a utensils. III. Some tools are not vehicles.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some instruments are machines → Partial overlap
2. All machines are vehicles → machines inside vehicles
3. No vehicles is a utensils → vehicles and utensils separate
4. All utensils are tools → utensils inside tools

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some instruments are vehicles"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No machines is a utensils"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some tools are not vehicles"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 8

Statements: Some fish are mammals. All mammals are wild. No wild is a cold-blooded. All cold-blooded are reptiles. Conclusions: I. Some fish are wild. II. No mammals is a cold-blooded. III. Some reptiles are not wild.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some fish are mammals → Partial overlap
2. All mammals are wild → mammals inside wild
3. No wild is a cold-blooded → wild and cold-blooded separate
4. All cold-blooded are reptiles → cold-blooded inside reptiles

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some fish are wild"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No mammals is a cold-blooded"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some reptiles are not wild"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 9

Statements: Some tools are vehicles. All vehicles are electronics. No electronics is a equipment. All equipment are gadgets. Conclusions: I. Some tools are electronics. II. No vehicles is a equipment. III. Some gadgets are not electronics.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some tools are vehicles → Partial overlap
2. All vehicles are electronics → vehicles inside electronics
3. No electronics is a equipment → electronics and equipment separate
4. All equipment are gadgets → equipment inside gadgets

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some tools are electronics"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No vehicles is a equipment"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some gadgets are not electronics"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 10

Statements: Some methods are systems. All systems are patterns. No patterns is a models. All models are theories. Conclusions: I. Some methods are patterns. II. No systems is a models. III. Some theories are not patterns.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some methods are systems → Partial overlap
2. All systems are patterns → systems inside patterns
3. No patterns is a models → patterns and models separate
4. All models are theories → models inside theories

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some methods are patterns"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No systems is a models"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some theories are not patterns"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 11

Statements: Some pilots are accountants. All accountants are entrepreneurs. No entrepreneurs is a managers. All managers are lawyers. Conclusions: I. Some pilots are entrepreneurs. II. No accountants is a managers. III. Some lawyers are not entrepreneurs.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some pilots are accountants → Partial overlap
2. All accountants are entrepreneurs → accountants inside entrepreneurs
3. No entrepreneurs is a managers → entrepreneurs and managers separate
4. All managers are lawyers → managers inside lawyers

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some pilots are entrepreneurs"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No accountants is a managers"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some lawyers are not entrepreneurs"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 12

Statements: Some efficient are beautiful. All beautiful are durable. No durable is a rare. All rare are useful. Conclusions: I. Some efficient are durable. II. No beautiful is a rare. III. Some useful are not durable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some efficient are beautiful → Partial overlap
2. All beautiful are durable → beautiful inside durable
3. No durable is a rare → durable and rare separate
4. All rare are useful → rare inside useful

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some efficient are durable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No beautiful is a rare"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some useful are not durable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 13

Statements: Some strategies are frameworks. All frameworks are concepts. No concepts is a ideas. All ideas are theories. Conclusions: I. Some strategies are concepts. II. No frameworks is a ideas. III. Some theories are not concepts.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some strategies are frameworks → Partial overlap
2. All frameworks are concepts → frameworks inside concepts
3. No concepts is a ideas → concepts and ideas separate
4. All ideas are theories → ideas inside theories

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some strategies are concepts"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No frameworks is a ideas"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some theories are not concepts"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 14

Statements: Some nurses are artists. All artists are musicians. No musicians is a doctors. All doctors are entrepreneurs. Conclusions: I. Some nurses are musicians. II. No artists is a doctors. III. Some entrepreneurs are not musicians.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some nurses are artists → Partial overlap
2. All artists are musicians → artists inside musicians
3. No musicians is a doctors → musicians and doctors separate
4. All doctors are entrepreneurs → doctors inside entrepreneurs

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some nurses are musicians"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No artists is a doctors"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some entrepreneurs are not musicians"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 15

Statements: Some equipment are instruments. All instruments are tools. No tools is a furniture. All furniture are gadgets. Conclusions: I. Some equipment are tools. II. No instruments is a furniture. III. Some gadgets are not tools.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some equipment are instruments → Partial overlap
2. All instruments are tools → instruments inside tools
3. No tools is a furniture → tools and furniture separate
4. All furniture are gadgets → furniture inside gadgets

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some equipment are tools"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No instruments is a furniture"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some gadgets are not tools"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 16

Statements: Some amphibians are carnivores. All carnivores are diurnal. No diurnal is a reptiles. All reptiles are warm-blooded. Conclusions: I. Some amphibians are diurnal. II. No carnivores is a reptiles. III. Some warm-blooded are not diurnal.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some amphibians are carnivores → Partial overlap
2. All carnivores are diurnal → carnivores inside diurnal
3. No diurnal is a reptiles → diurnal and reptiles separate
4. All reptiles are warm-blooded → reptiles inside warm-blooded

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some amphibians are diurnal"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No carnivores is a reptiles"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some warm-blooded are not diurnal"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 17

Statements: Some mammals are cold-blooded. All cold-blooded are omnivores. No omnivores is a fish. All fish are domestic. Conclusions: I. Some mammals are omnivores. II. No cold-blooded is a fish. III. Some domestic are not omnivores.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some mammals are cold-blooded → Partial overlap
2. All cold-blooded are omnivores → cold-blooded inside omnivores
3. No omnivores is a fish → omnivores and fish separate
4. All fish are domestic → fish inside domestic

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some mammals are omnivores"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No cold-blooded is a fish"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some domestic are not omnivores"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 18

Statements: Some versatile are accessible. All accessible are beautiful. No beautiful is a sustainable. All sustainable are essential. Conclusions: I. Some versatile are beautiful. II. No accessible is a sustainable. III. Some essential are not beautiful.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some versatile are accessible → Partial overlap
2. All accessible are beautiful → accessible inside beautiful
3. No beautiful is a sustainable → beautiful and sustainable separate
4. All sustainable are essential → sustainable inside essential

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some versatile are beautiful"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No accessible is a sustainable"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some essential are not beautiful"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 19

Statements: Some omnivores are reptiles. All reptiles are nocturnal. No nocturnal is a domestic. All domestic are invertebrates. Conclusions: I. Some omnivores are nocturnal. II. No reptiles is a domestic. III. Some invertebrates are not nocturnal.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some omnivores are reptiles → Partial overlap
2. All reptiles are nocturnal → reptiles inside nocturnal
3. No nocturnal is a domestic → nocturnal and domestic separate
4. All domestic are invertebrates → domestic inside invertebrates

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some omnivores are nocturnal"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No reptiles is a domestic"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some invertebrates are not nocturnal"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 20

Statements: Some entrepreneurs are engineers. All engineers are lawyers. No lawyers is a scientists. All scientists are managers. Conclusions: I. Some entrepreneurs are lawyers. II. No engineers is a scientists. III. Some managers are not lawyers.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some entrepreneurs are engineers → Partial overlap
2. All engineers are lawyers → engineers inside lawyers
3. No lawyers is a scientists → lawyers and scientists separate
4. All scientists are managers → scientists inside managers

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some entrepreneurs are lawyers"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No engineers is a scientists"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some managers are not lawyers"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet