ReasoningAbility.com

Four Statement Complex - Absolute-Beginner Level: core concept mastery Four Statement Complex ABSOLUTE BEGINNER

This skill primer 🌟 worksheet focuses on Four Statement Complex - a key topic in Syllogism. You'll solve 20 absolute-beginner-level problems (Worksheet 1 of 10). The primary focus is on core concept mastery. Master four statement complex problems, four statement complex reasoning questions, and four statement complex practice through systematic practice.

📝 Worksheet 1 of 10 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Absolute Beginner level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Four Statement Complex
Worksheet 1 of 10 (0% complete)

Question 1

Statements: Some cold-blooded are nocturnal. All nocturnal are fish. No fish is a carnivores. All carnivores are domestic. Conclusions: I. Some cold-blooded are fish. II. No nocturnal is a carnivores. III. Some domestic are not fish.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some cold-blooded are nocturnal → Partial overlap
2. All nocturnal are fish → nocturnal inside fish
3. No fish is a carnivores → fish and carnivores separate
4. All carnivores are domestic → carnivores inside domestic

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some cold-blooded are fish"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No nocturnal is a carnivores"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some domestic are not fish"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 2

Statements: Some frameworks are structures. All structures are principles. No principles is a models. All models are concepts. Conclusions: I. Some frameworks are principles. II. No structures is a models. III. Some concepts are not principles.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some frameworks are structures → Partial overlap
2. All structures are principles → structures inside principles
3. No principles is a models → principles and models separate
4. All models are concepts → models inside concepts

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some frameworks are principles"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No structures is a models"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some concepts are not principles"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 3

Statements: Some wild are birds. All birds are diurnal. No diurnal is a omnivores. All omnivores are cold-blooded. Conclusions: I. Some wild are diurnal. II. No birds is a omnivores. III. Some cold-blooded are not diurnal.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some wild are birds → Partial overlap
2. All birds are diurnal → birds inside diurnal
3. No diurnal is a omnivores → diurnal and omnivores separate
4. All omnivores are cold-blooded → omnivores inside cold-blooded

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some wild are diurnal"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No birds is a omnivores"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some cold-blooded are not diurnal"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 4

Statements: Some scientists are doctors. All doctors are teachers. No teachers is a pharmacists. All pharmacists are writers. Conclusions: I. Some scientists are teachers. II. No doctors is a pharmacists. III. Some writers are not teachers.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some scientists are doctors → Partial overlap
2. All doctors are teachers → doctors inside teachers
3. No teachers is a pharmacists → teachers and pharmacists separate
4. All pharmacists are writers → pharmacists inside writers

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some scientists are teachers"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No doctors is a pharmacists"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some writers are not teachers"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 5

Statements: Some ideas are methods. All methods are structures. No structures is a principles. All principles are frameworks. Conclusions: I. Some ideas are structures. II. No methods is a principles. III. Some frameworks are not structures.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some ideas are methods → Partial overlap
2. All methods are structures → methods inside structures
3. No structures is a principles → structures and principles separate
4. All principles are frameworks → principles inside frameworks

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some ideas are structures"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No methods is a principles"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some frameworks are not structures"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 6

Statements: Some utensils are furniture. All furniture are tools. No tools is a appliances. All appliances are instruments. Conclusions: I. Some utensils are tools. II. No furniture is a appliances. III. Some instruments are not tools.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some utensils are furniture → Partial overlap
2. All furniture are tools → furniture inside tools
3. No tools is a appliances → tools and appliances separate
4. All appliances are instruments → appliances inside instruments

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some utensils are tools"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No furniture is a appliances"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some instruments are not tools"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 7

Statements: Some tools are appliances. All appliances are vehicles. No vehicles is a equipment. All equipment are utensils. Conclusions: I. Some tools are vehicles. II. No appliances is a equipment. III. Some utensils are not vehicles.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some tools are appliances → Partial overlap
2. All appliances are vehicles → appliances inside vehicles
3. No vehicles is a equipment → vehicles and equipment separate
4. All equipment are utensils → equipment inside utensils

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some tools are vehicles"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No appliances is a equipment"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some utensils are not vehicles"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 8

Statements: Some durable are rare. All rare are reliable. No reliable is a beautiful. All beautiful are accessible. Conclusions: I. Some durable are reliable. II. No rare is a beautiful. III. Some accessible are not reliable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some durable are rare → Partial overlap
2. All rare are reliable → rare inside reliable
3. No reliable is a beautiful → reliable and beautiful separate
4. All beautiful are accessible → beautiful inside accessible

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some durable are reliable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No rare is a beautiful"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some accessible are not reliable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 9

Statements: Some doctors are athletes. All athletes are pharmacists. No pharmacists is a scientists. All scientists are lawyers. Conclusions: I. Some doctors are pharmacists. II. No athletes is a scientists. III. Some lawyers are not pharmacists.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some doctors are athletes → Partial overlap
2. All athletes are pharmacists → athletes inside pharmacists
3. No pharmacists is a scientists → pharmacists and scientists separate
4. All scientists are lawyers → scientists inside lawyers

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some doctors are pharmacists"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No athletes is a scientists"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some lawyers are not pharmacists"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 10

Statements: Some innovative are beautiful. All beautiful are reliable. No reliable is a valuable. All valuable are sustainable. Conclusions: I. Some innovative are reliable. II. No beautiful is a valuable. III. Some sustainable are not reliable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some innovative are beautiful → Partial overlap
2. All beautiful are reliable → beautiful inside reliable
3. No reliable is a valuable → reliable and valuable separate
4. All valuable are sustainable → valuable inside sustainable

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some innovative are reliable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No beautiful is a valuable"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some sustainable are not reliable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 11

Statements: Some principles are theories. All theories are structures. No structures is a patterns. All patterns are ideas. Conclusions: I. Some principles are structures. II. No theories is a patterns. III. Some ideas are not structures.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some principles are theories → Partial overlap
2. All theories are structures → theories inside structures
3. No structures is a patterns → structures and patterns separate
4. All patterns are ideas → patterns inside ideas

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some principles are structures"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No theories is a patterns"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some ideas are not structures"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 12

Statements: Some ideas are models. All models are frameworks. No frameworks is a concepts. All concepts are methods. Conclusions: I. Some ideas are frameworks. II. No models is a concepts. III. Some methods are not frameworks.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some ideas are models → Partial overlap
2. All models are frameworks → models inside frameworks
3. No frameworks is a concepts → frameworks and concepts separate
4. All concepts are methods → concepts inside methods

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some ideas are frameworks"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No models is a concepts"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some methods are not frameworks"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 13

Statements: Some ornaments are electronics. All electronics are appliances. No appliances is a furniture. All furniture are instruments. Conclusions: I. Some ornaments are appliances. II. No electronics is a furniture. III. Some instruments are not appliances.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some ornaments are electronics → Partial overlap
2. All electronics are appliances → electronics inside appliances
3. No appliances is a furniture → appliances and furniture separate
4. All furniture are instruments → furniture inside instruments

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some ornaments are appliances"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No electronics is a furniture"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some instruments are not appliances"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 14

Statements: Some scientists are pharmacists. All pharmacists are accountants. No accountants is a managers. All managers are doctors. Conclusions: I. Some scientists are accountants. II. No pharmacists is a managers. III. Some doctors are not accountants.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some scientists are pharmacists → Partial overlap
2. All pharmacists are accountants → pharmacists inside accountants
3. No accountants is a managers → accountants and managers separate
4. All managers are doctors → managers inside doctors

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some scientists are accountants"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No pharmacists is a managers"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some doctors are not accountants"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 15

Statements: Some teachers are accountants. All accountants are nurses. No nurses is a architects. All architects are pharmacists. Conclusions: I. Some teachers are nurses. II. No accountants is a architects. III. Some pharmacists are not nurses.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some teachers are accountants → Partial overlap
2. All accountants are nurses → accountants inside nurses
3. No nurses is a architects → nurses and architects separate
4. All architects are pharmacists → architects inside pharmacists

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some teachers are nurses"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No accountants is a architects"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some pharmacists are not nurses"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 16

Statements: Some sustainable are essential. All essential are beautiful. No beautiful is a accessible. All accessible are reliable. Conclusions: I. Some sustainable are beautiful. II. No essential is a accessible. III. Some reliable are not beautiful.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some sustainable are essential → Partial overlap
2. All essential are beautiful → essential inside beautiful
3. No beautiful is a accessible → beautiful and accessible separate
4. All accessible are reliable → accessible inside reliable

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some sustainable are beautiful"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No essential is a accessible"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some reliable are not beautiful"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 17

Statements: Some sustainable are valuable. All valuable are reliable. No reliable is a rare. All rare are useful. Conclusions: I. Some sustainable are reliable. II. No valuable is a rare. III. Some useful are not reliable.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some sustainable are valuable → Partial overlap
2. All valuable are reliable → valuable inside reliable
3. No reliable is a rare → reliable and rare separate
4. All rare are useful → rare inside useful

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some sustainable are reliable"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No valuable is a rare"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some useful are not reliable"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 18

Statements: Some pharmacists are managers. All managers are lawyers. No lawyers is a accountants. All accountants are nurses. Conclusions: I. Some pharmacists are lawyers. II. No managers is a accountants. III. Some nurses are not lawyers.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some pharmacists are managers → Partial overlap
2. All managers are lawyers → managers inside lawyers
3. No lawyers is a accountants → lawyers and accountants separate
4. All accountants are nurses → accountants inside nurses

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some pharmacists are lawyers"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No managers is a accountants"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some nurses are not lawyers"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 19

Statements: Some ornaments are electronics. All electronics are gadgets. No gadgets is a devices. All devices are furniture. Conclusions: I. Some ornaments are gadgets. II. No electronics is a devices. III. Some furniture are not gadgets.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some ornaments are electronics → Partial overlap
2. All electronics are gadgets → electronics inside gadgets
3. No gadgets is a devices → gadgets and devices separate
4. All devices are furniture → devices inside furniture

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some ornaments are gadgets"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No electronics is a devices"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some furniture are not gadgets"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow

Question 20

Statements: Some beautiful are sustainable. All sustainable are useful. No useful is a versatile. All versatile are innovative. Conclusions: I. Some beautiful are useful. II. No sustainable is a versatile. III. Some innovative are not useful.
Complex Multi-Statement Analysis:

Statement Chain:
1. Some beautiful are sustainable → Partial overlap
2. All sustainable are useful → sustainable inside useful
3. No useful is a versatile → useful and versatile separate
4. All versatile are innovative → versatile inside innovative

Checking Each Conclusion:

✓ Conclusion I: "Some beautiful are useful"
Some A are B (I) + All B are C (A) = I + A = I - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion II: "No sustainable is a versatile"
All B are C (A) + No C is D (E) = A + E = E - FOLLOWS

✓ Conclusion III: "Some innovative are not useful"
All D are E (A) + No C is D (E, converted) = A + E = O* - FOLLOWS

Answer: All conclusions I, II and III follow
Next Worksheet