Develop analytical thinking for critical analysis problems
Learn step-by-step race against clock approaches
Understand the logic behind argument evaluation solutions
Apply critical thinking to logical assessment challenges
Your progress through Strong/Weak Arguments
Worksheet 8 of 30 (26% complete)
Question 1
Context: Debate in City Council about building a new stadium
Argument: Sports stadiums are exciting and make people happy
In this context, how strong is this argument?
Weak argument in this context: Vague emotional appeal without addressing municipal finance or public benefit
Question 2
In this argument: 'All humans are mortal. Socrates is human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.'
Which statement is the CONCLUSION?
The conclusion is what the argument tries to prove. The premises ('All humans are mortal' and 'Socrates is human') support the conclusion 'Socrates is mortal.'
Question 3
Question: Should the government increase funding for public schools?
Argument: No, because increased funding often leads to administrative bloat rather than classroom improvements
Is this a strong or weak argument?
Strong argument: Identifies a specific problem with a clear causal relationship
Question 4
Argument: Studies show that countries with higher education spending have stronger economies. Therefore, increasing education spending will strengthen our economy.
Evaluate the logical validity:
Based on empirical evidence with reasonable causal connection
Question 5
Argument by analogy: 'Social media causes mental health problems in teens, similar to how tobacco causes physical health problems. We regulate tobacco, so we should regulate social media similarly.'
What is the most important DIFFERENCE that weakens this analogy?
A critical disanalogy: tobacco has no redeeming benefits, while social media has legitimate uses. This makes the analogy weaker.
Question 6
To properly evaluate whether the diversity training CAUSED the increase in minority hiring, what counterfactual would you need to compare against?
Counterfactual reasoning asks: 'What would have happened otherwise?' Without a baseline or control, you can't isolate the training's effect from other factors (e.g., a tight labor market).
Question 7
Argument: Smoking causes lung cancer. John smokes. Therefore, John will get lung cancer.
Evaluate the logical validity:
Confuses statistical risk with certainty; smoking increases but doesn't guarantee cancer
Question 8
What is the logical form of this argument?
Form: If P then Q. Q is true. Therefore P. This is affirming the consequent, a formal fallacy. The ground could be wet from sprinklers, not rain.
Question 9
Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide
Argument: Pilot programs in multiple countries show 4-day weeks maintain productivity while improving employee well-being and reducing environmental impact through less commuting
What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Doesn't address implementation costs. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.
Question 10
Argument: 'After we started the job training program, unemployment went down. So the program caused the decrease.'
What important alternative explanation is ignored?
This commits the 'post hoc' fallacy (after this, therefore because of this). Without a control group or considering national trends, we can't establish causation.
Question 11
Issue: Should the minimum wage be increased to $15/hour?
Argument A: No, because minimum wage jobs are meant for teenagers, not adults
Argument B: No, because small businesses will be forced to reduce hours or lay off workers to manage increased labor costs
Argument C: Yes, because it's been too long since the last minimum wage increase
Rank these arguments from strongest to weakest. Which is the STRONGEST?
Ranking analysis: A: Based on outdated assumption; data shows many adults work minimum wage jobs B: Identifies specific economic mechanism and realistic business response C: Time passage alone doesn't justify policy change without addressing underlying conditions
Question 12
Is this argument deductive or inductive?
Deductive arguments aim for logical necessity. If premises are true, conclusion must be true. This is a classic syllogism.
Question 13
To properly evaluate whether the diversity training CAUSED the increase in minority hiring, what counterfactual would you need to compare against?
Counterfactual reasoning asks: 'What would have happened otherwise?' Without a baseline or control, you can't isolate the training's effect from other factors (e.g., a tight labor market).
Question 14
Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide
Argument: People have worked 5 days a week for decades, so we shouldn't change it
Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens
Argument: Pilot studies in Finland and Kenya show UBI reduces poverty and improves mental health without reducing employment
Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
To properly evaluate whether the diversity training CAUSED the increase in minority hiring, what counterfactual would you need to compare against?
Counterfactual reasoning asks: 'What would have happened otherwise?' Without a baseline or control, you can't isolate the training's effect from other factors (e.g., a tight labor market).
Question 17
Argument by analogy: 'We ban violent movies for children. Violent video games are similar in their violent content. Therefore, we should also ban violent video games for children.'
What is the STRONGEST counterargument to this analogy?
Interactive vs. passive consumption is a key difference that may make the analogy weak. Good analogical reasoning requires relevant similarities outweigh relevant differences.
Question 18
Argument by analogy: 'We ban violent movies for children. Violent video games are similar in their violent content. Therefore, we should also ban violent video games for children.'
What is the STRONGEST counterargument to this analogy?
Interactive vs. passive consumption is a key difference that may make the analogy weak. Good analogical reasoning requires relevant similarities outweigh relevant differences.
Question 19
Argument: Studies show that countries with higher education spending have stronger economies. Therefore, increasing education spending will strengthen our economy.
Evaluate the logical validity:
Based on empirical evidence with reasonable causal connection
Question 20
Context: Debate in City Council about building a new stadium
Argument: Public funding should prioritize schools and infrastructure over entertainment venues
In this context, how strong is this argument?
Strong argument in this context: Addresses opportunity cost and public spending priorities
💪 Strong progress! 24% done with Strong/Weak Arguments worksheets. You're on fire!