statement_consistency_check: Worksheet 6 - Intermediate-Advanced Practice statement_consistency_check INTERMEDIATE ADVANCED

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Anita tells truth, then Rohan has gold coin.
But Rohan claims not to have it - contradiction if Rohan tells truth.
If Rohan lies, then Rohan DOES have the item - consistent with Anita.
Then Kiran says Anita lies - but we assumed Anita tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Anita lies, then Rohan does NOT have gold coin.
Rohan says the same thing - consistent if Rohan tells truth.
Kiran says Anita lies - consistent if Kiran tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Anita lies, Rohan and Kiran tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Rahul tells truth, then Neha has bronze medal.
But Neha claims not to have it - contradiction if Neha tells truth.
If Neha lies, then Neha DOES have the item - consistent with Rahul.
Then Vikram says Rahul lies - but we assumed Rahul tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Rahul lies, then Neha does NOT have bronze medal.
Neha says the same thing - consistent if Neha tells truth.
Vikram says Rahul lies - consistent if Vikram tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Rahul lies, Neha and Vikram tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Kiran tells truth, then Farhan has sapphire.
But Farhan claims not to have it - contradiction if Farhan tells truth.
If Farhan lies, then Farhan DOES have the item - consistent with Kiran.
Then Gaurav says Kiran lies - but we assumed Kiran tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Kiran lies, then Farhan does NOT have sapphire.
Farhan says the same thing - consistent if Farhan tells truth.
Gaurav says Kiran lies - consistent if Gaurav tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Kiran lies, Farhan and Gaurav tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Kiran tells truth, then Sunil has bronze medal.
But Sunil claims not to have it - contradiction if Sunil tells truth.
If Sunil lies, then Sunil DOES have the item - consistent with Kiran.
Then Priya says Kiran lies - but we assumed Kiran tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Kiran lies, then Sunil does NOT have bronze medal.
Sunil says the same thing - consistent if Sunil tells truth.
Priya says Kiran lies - consistent if Priya tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Kiran lies, Sunil and Priya tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Gaurav tells truth, then Priya has ruby.
But Priya claims not to have it - contradiction if Priya tells truth.
If Priya lies, then Priya DOES have the item - consistent with Gaurav.
Then Kiran says Gaurav lies - but we assumed Gaurav tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Gaurav lies, then Priya does NOT have ruby.
Priya says the same thing - consistent if Priya tells truth.
Kiran says Gaurav lies - consistent if Kiran tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Gaurav lies, Priya and Kiran tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Harsha tells truth, then Rohan has bronze medal.
But Rohan claims not to have it - contradiction if Rohan tells truth.
If Rohan lies, then Rohan DOES have the item - consistent with Harsha.
Then Pooja says Harsha lies - but we assumed Harsha tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Harsha lies, then Rohan does NOT have bronze medal.
Rohan says the same thing - consistent if Rohan tells truth.
Pooja says Harsha lies - consistent if Pooja tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Harsha lies, Rohan and Pooja tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Meera tells truth, then Pooja has gold coin.
But Pooja claims not to have it - contradiction if Pooja tells truth.
If Pooja lies, then Pooja DOES have the item - consistent with Meera.
Then Gaurav says Meera lies - but we assumed Meera tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Meera lies, then Pooja does NOT have gold coin.
Pooja says the same thing - consistent if Pooja tells truth.
Gaurav says Meera lies - consistent if Gaurav tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Meera lies, Pooja and Gaurav tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Farhan tells truth, then Gaurav has silver ring.
But Gaurav claims not to have it - contradiction if Gaurav tells truth.
If Gaurav lies, then Gaurav DOES have the item - consistent with Farhan.
Then Amit says Farhan lies - but we assumed Farhan tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Farhan lies, then Gaurav does NOT have silver ring.
Gaurav says the same thing - consistent if Gaurav tells truth.
Amit says Farhan lies - consistent if Amit tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Farhan lies, Gaurav and Amit tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Amit tells truth, then Divya has gold coin.
But Divya claims not to have it - contradiction if Divya tells truth.
If Divya lies, then Divya DOES have the item - consistent with Amit.
Then Neha says Amit lies - but we assumed Amit tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Amit lies, then Divya does NOT have gold coin.
Divya says the same thing - consistent if Divya tells truth.
Neha says Amit lies - consistent if Neha tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Amit lies, Divya and Neha tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Meera tells truth, then Amit has diamond.
But Amit claims not to have it - contradiction if Amit tells truth.
If Amit lies, then Amit DOES have the item - consistent with Meera.
Then Farhan says Meera lies - but we assumed Meera tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Meera lies, then Amit does NOT have diamond.
Amit says the same thing - consistent if Amit tells truth.
Farhan says Meera lies - consistent if Farhan tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Meera lies, Amit and Farhan tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Priya tells truth, then Rahul has crystal.
But Rahul claims not to have it - contradiction if Rahul tells truth.
If Rahul lies, then Rahul DOES have the item - consistent with Priya.
Then Neha says Priya lies - but we assumed Priya tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Priya lies, then Rahul does NOT have crystal.
Rahul says the same thing - consistent if Rahul tells truth.
Neha says Priya lies - consistent if Neha tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Priya lies, Rahul and Neha tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Leena tells truth, then Manoj has sapphire.
But Manoj claims not to have it - contradiction if Manoj tells truth.
If Manoj lies, then Manoj DOES have the item - consistent with Leena.
Then Deepa says Leena lies - but we assumed Leena tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Leena lies, then Manoj does NOT have sapphire.
Manoj says the same thing - consistent if Manoj tells truth.
Deepa says Leena lies - consistent if Deepa tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Leena lies, Manoj and Deepa tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Rahul tells truth, then Rohan has bronze medal.
But Rohan claims not to have it - contradiction if Rohan tells truth.
If Rohan lies, then Rohan DOES have the item - consistent with Rahul.
Then Farhan says Rahul lies - but we assumed Rahul tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Rahul lies, then Rohan does NOT have bronze medal.
Rohan says the same thing - consistent if Rohan tells truth.
Farhan says Rahul lies - consistent if Farhan tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Rahul lies, Rohan and Farhan tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Leena tells truth, then Anita has ruby.
But Anita claims not to have it - contradiction if Anita tells truth.
If Anita lies, then Anita DOES have the item - consistent with Leena.
Then Divya says Leena lies - but we assumed Leena tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Leena lies, then Anita does NOT have ruby.
Anita says the same thing - consistent if Anita tells truth.
Divya says Leena lies - consistent if Divya tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Leena lies, Anita and Divya tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Kiran tells truth, then Harsha has gold coin.
But Harsha claims not to have it - contradiction if Harsha tells truth.
If Harsha lies, then Harsha DOES have the item - consistent with Kiran.
Then Vikram says Kiran lies - but we assumed Kiran tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Kiran lies, then Harsha does NOT have gold coin.
Harsha says the same thing - consistent if Harsha tells truth.
Vikram says Kiran lies - consistent if Vikram tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Kiran lies, Harsha and Vikram tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Neha tells truth, then Rahul has silver ring.
But Rahul claims not to have it - contradiction if Rahul tells truth.
If Rahul lies, then Rahul DOES have the item - consistent with Neha.
Then Harsha says Neha lies - but we assumed Neha tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Neha lies, then Rahul does NOT have silver ring.
Rahul says the same thing - consistent if Rahul tells truth.
Harsha says Neha lies - consistent if Harsha tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Neha lies, Rahul and Harsha tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Amit tells truth, then Gaurav has diamond.
But Gaurav claims not to have it - contradiction if Gaurav tells truth.
If Gaurav lies, then Gaurav DOES have the item - consistent with Amit.
Then Farhan says Amit lies - but we assumed Amit tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Amit lies, then Gaurav does NOT have diamond.
Gaurav says the same thing - consistent if Gaurav tells truth.
Farhan says Amit lies - consistent if Farhan tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Amit lies, Gaurav and Farhan tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Meera tells truth, then Sanjay has gold coin.
But Sanjay claims not to have it - contradiction if Sanjay tells truth.
If Sanjay lies, then Sanjay DOES have the item - consistent with Meera.
Then Kiran says Meera lies - but we assumed Meera tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Meera lies, then Sanjay does NOT have gold coin.
Sanjay says the same thing - consistent if Sanjay tells truth.
Kiran says Meera lies - consistent if Kiran tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Meera lies, Sanjay and Kiran tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Vikram tells truth, then Manoj has diamond.
But Manoj claims not to have it - contradiction if Manoj tells truth.
If Manoj lies, then Manoj DOES have the item - consistent with Vikram.
Then Ravi says Vikram lies - but we assumed Vikram tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Vikram lies, then Manoj does NOT have diamond.
Manoj says the same thing - consistent if Manoj tells truth.
Ravi says Vikram lies - consistent if Ravi tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Vikram lies, Manoj and Ravi tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Ravi tells truth, then Anita has sapphire.
But Anita claims not to have it - contradiction if Anita tells truth.
If Anita lies, then Anita DOES have the item - consistent with Ravi.
Then Neha says Ravi lies - but we assumed Ravi tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Ravi lies, then Anita does NOT have sapphire.
Anita says the same thing - consistent if Anita tells truth.
Neha says Ravi lies - consistent if Neha tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Ravi lies, Anita and Neha tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.