statement_consistency_check - Intermediate Level: tricky scenarios handling statement_consistency_check INTERMEDIATE

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Amit tells truth, then Deepa has gold coin.
But Deepa claims not to have it - contradiction if Deepa tells truth.
If Deepa lies, then Deepa DOES have the item - consistent with Amit.
Then Manoj says Amit lies - but we assumed Amit tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Amit lies, then Deepa does NOT have gold coin.
Deepa says the same thing - consistent if Deepa tells truth.
Manoj says Amit lies - consistent if Manoj tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Amit lies, Deepa and Manoj tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Manoj tells truth, then Harsha has emerald.
But Harsha claims not to have it - contradiction if Harsha tells truth.
If Harsha lies, then Harsha DOES have the item - consistent with Manoj.
Then Sunil says Manoj lies - but we assumed Manoj tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Manoj lies, then Harsha does NOT have emerald.
Harsha says the same thing - consistent if Harsha tells truth.
Sunil says Manoj lies - consistent if Sunil tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Manoj lies, Harsha and Sunil tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Deepa tells truth, then Neha has crystal.
But Neha claims not to have it - contradiction if Neha tells truth.
If Neha lies, then Neha DOES have the item - consistent with Deepa.
Then Manoj says Deepa lies - but we assumed Deepa tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Deepa lies, then Neha does NOT have crystal.
Neha says the same thing - consistent if Neha tells truth.
Manoj says Deepa lies - consistent if Manoj tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Deepa lies, Neha and Manoj tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Farhan tells truth, then Meera has diamond.
But Meera claims not to have it - contradiction if Meera tells truth.
If Meera lies, then Meera DOES have the item - consistent with Farhan.
Then Priya says Farhan lies - but we assumed Farhan tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Farhan lies, then Meera does NOT have diamond.
Meera says the same thing - consistent if Meera tells truth.
Priya says Farhan lies - consistent if Priya tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Farhan lies, Meera and Priya tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Deepa tells truth, then Meera has gold coin.
But Meera claims not to have it - contradiction if Meera tells truth.
If Meera lies, then Meera DOES have the item - consistent with Deepa.
Then Rahul says Deepa lies - but we assumed Deepa tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Deepa lies, then Meera does NOT have gold coin.
Meera says the same thing - consistent if Meera tells truth.
Rahul says Deepa lies - consistent if Rahul tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Deepa lies, Meera and Rahul tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Meera tells truth, then Divya has sapphire.
But Divya claims not to have it - contradiction if Divya tells truth.
If Divya lies, then Divya DOES have the item - consistent with Meera.
Then Harsha says Meera lies - but we assumed Meera tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Meera lies, then Divya does NOT have sapphire.
Divya says the same thing - consistent if Divya tells truth.
Harsha says Meera lies - consistent if Harsha tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Meera lies, Divya and Harsha tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Rohan tells truth, then Kiran has emerald.
But Kiran claims not to have it - contradiction if Kiran tells truth.
If Kiran lies, then Kiran DOES have the item - consistent with Rohan.
Then Gaurav says Rohan lies - but we assumed Rohan tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Rohan lies, then Kiran does NOT have emerald.
Kiran says the same thing - consistent if Kiran tells truth.
Gaurav says Rohan lies - consistent if Gaurav tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Rohan lies, Kiran and Gaurav tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Farhan tells truth, then Meera has crystal.
But Meera claims not to have it - contradiction if Meera tells truth.
If Meera lies, then Meera DOES have the item - consistent with Farhan.
Then Sunil says Farhan lies - but we assumed Farhan tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Farhan lies, then Meera does NOT have crystal.
Meera says the same thing - consistent if Meera tells truth.
Sunil says Farhan lies - consistent if Sunil tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Farhan lies, Meera and Sunil tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Farhan tells truth, then Divya has silver ring.
But Divya claims not to have it - contradiction if Divya tells truth.
If Divya lies, then Divya DOES have the item - consistent with Farhan.
Then Neha says Farhan lies - but we assumed Farhan tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Farhan lies, then Divya does NOT have silver ring.
Divya says the same thing - consistent if Divya tells truth.
Neha says Farhan lies - consistent if Neha tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Farhan lies, Divya and Neha tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Ravi tells truth, then Divya has pearl.
But Divya claims not to have it - contradiction if Divya tells truth.
If Divya lies, then Divya DOES have the item - consistent with Ravi.
Then Sunil says Ravi lies - but we assumed Ravi tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Ravi lies, then Divya does NOT have pearl.
Divya says the same thing - consistent if Divya tells truth.
Sunil says Ravi lies - consistent if Sunil tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Ravi lies, Divya and Sunil tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Sanjay tells truth, then Leena has pearl.
But Leena claims not to have it - contradiction if Leena tells truth.
If Leena lies, then Leena DOES have the item - consistent with Sanjay.
Then Sunil says Sanjay lies - but we assumed Sanjay tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Sanjay lies, then Leena does NOT have pearl.
Leena says the same thing - consistent if Leena tells truth.
Sunil says Sanjay lies - consistent if Sunil tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Sanjay lies, Leena and Sunil tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Sanjay tells truth, then Leena has artifact.
But Leena claims not to have it - contradiction if Leena tells truth.
If Leena lies, then Leena DOES have the item - consistent with Sanjay.
Then Anita says Sanjay lies - but we assumed Sanjay tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Sanjay lies, then Leena does NOT have artifact.
Leena says the same thing - consistent if Leena tells truth.
Anita says Sanjay lies - consistent if Anita tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Sanjay lies, Leena and Anita tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Rahul tells truth, then Neha has ruby.
But Neha claims not to have it - contradiction if Neha tells truth.
If Neha lies, then Neha DOES have the item - consistent with Rahul.
Then Kiran says Rahul lies - but we assumed Rahul tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Rahul lies, then Neha does NOT have ruby.
Neha says the same thing - consistent if Neha tells truth.
Kiran says Rahul lies - consistent if Kiran tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Rahul lies, Neha and Kiran tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Anita tells truth, then Priya has sapphire.
But Priya claims not to have it - contradiction if Priya tells truth.
If Priya lies, then Priya DOES have the item - consistent with Anita.
Then Rahul says Anita lies - but we assumed Anita tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Anita lies, then Priya does NOT have sapphire.
Priya says the same thing - consistent if Priya tells truth.
Rahul says Anita lies - consistent if Rahul tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Anita lies, Priya and Rahul tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Kiran tells truth, then Farhan has crystal.
But Farhan claims not to have it - contradiction if Farhan tells truth.
If Farhan lies, then Farhan DOES have the item - consistent with Kiran.
Then Leena says Kiran lies - but we assumed Kiran tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Kiran lies, then Farhan does NOT have crystal.
Farhan says the same thing - consistent if Farhan tells truth.
Leena says Kiran lies - consistent if Leena tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Kiran lies, Farhan and Leena tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Pooja tells truth, then Priya has emerald.
But Priya claims not to have it - contradiction if Priya tells truth.
If Priya lies, then Priya DOES have the item - consistent with Pooja.
Then Amit says Pooja lies - but we assumed Pooja tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Pooja lies, then Priya does NOT have emerald.
Priya says the same thing - consistent if Priya tells truth.
Amit says Pooja lies - consistent if Amit tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Pooja lies, Priya and Amit tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Vikram tells truth, then Rohan has pearl.
But Rohan claims not to have it - contradiction if Rohan tells truth.
If Rohan lies, then Rohan DOES have the item - consistent with Vikram.
Then Harsha says Vikram lies - but we assumed Vikram tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Vikram lies, then Rohan does NOT have pearl.
Rohan says the same thing - consistent if Rohan tells truth.
Harsha says Vikram lies - consistent if Harsha tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Vikram lies, Rohan and Harsha tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Amit tells truth, then Pooja has emerald.
But Pooja claims not to have it - contradiction if Pooja tells truth.
If Pooja lies, then Pooja DOES have the item - consistent with Amit.
Then Farhan says Amit lies - but we assumed Amit tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Amit lies, then Pooja does NOT have emerald.
Pooja says the same thing - consistent if Pooja tells truth.
Farhan says Amit lies - consistent if Farhan tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Amit lies, Pooja and Farhan tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Rahul tells truth, then Farhan has silver ring.
But Farhan claims not to have it - contradiction if Farhan tells truth.
If Farhan lies, then Farhan DOES have the item - consistent with Rahul.
Then Rohan says Rahul lies - but we assumed Rahul tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Rahul lies, then Farhan does NOT have silver ring.
Farhan says the same thing - consistent if Farhan tells truth.
Rohan says Rahul lies - consistent if Rohan tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Rahul lies, Farhan and Rohan tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Divya tells truth, then Sunil has ruby.
But Sunil claims not to have it - contradiction if Sunil tells truth.
If Sunil lies, then Sunil DOES have the item - consistent with Divya.
Then Gaurav says Divya lies - but we assumed Divya tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Divya lies, then Sunil does NOT have ruby.
Sunil says the same thing - consistent if Sunil tells truth.
Gaurav says Divya lies - consistent if Gaurav tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Divya lies, Sunil and Gaurav tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.