Statement-Argument - Expert Level: opposing arguments EXPERT

Intensive progress check 🎯 drill: 20 expert-level statement-argument questions. Worksheet 30 of 30 hones your opposing arguments abilities. Practice strong arguments, weak arguments, logical reasoning under timed conditions. Best for expert-level students seeking challenging problems and time-bound practice.

📝 Worksheet 30 of 30 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Expert level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:

Develop winning strategies for strong arguments
Learn smart approaches to weak arguments
Optimize your progress check 🎯 solving technique
Build strategic thinking in logical reasoning
Master opposing arguments through proven methods

Your progress through Statement-Argument

Worksheet 30 of 30 (100% complete)

Question 1

Text: 'Are we going to stand by while our children's future is destroyed by inaction on climate change?' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?

Uses a rhetorical question to engage audience and appeals to parental concerns for emotional impact

argument, rhetoric, persuasion

Question 2

Argument: Four-day work weeks increase productivity because employees are more refreshed and focused when working fewer days. Which piece of evidence is LEAST relevant to evaluating this argument?

This evidence is neutral because it doesn't address the core causal claim about productivity/discipline/value, focusing instead on tangential factors.

argument, strengthen, weaken, evidence

Question 3

Original Argument: Artificial intelligence will solve most of humanity's problems through automation and optimization Which counterargument most effectively challenges this position?

This directly challenges the premise by showing how AI might create more problems than it solves

argument, counter, debate

Question 4

Statement: Should companies allow employees to work from home permanently? Argument: Yes, it reduces commuting time and increases productivity Is this argument strong or weak?

Strong - cites specific measurable benefits

argument, strength, evaluation

Question 5

Argument: College education is no longer worth the cost because tuition has risen faster than inflation while starting salaries have stagnated. Which piece of evidence is LEAST relevant to evaluating this argument?

This evidence is neutral because it doesn't address the core causal claim about productivity/discipline/value, focusing instead on tangential factors.

argument, strengthen, weaken, evidence

Question 6

Statement: Should the city build more public parks? Argument: Yes, public parks improve community health and well-being Is this argument strong or weak?

Strong - directly addresses health benefits with clear reasoning

argument, strength, evaluation

Question 7

Claim: Remote work increases employee productivity Evidence: A Twitter poll showing people feel more productive at home How would you rate the quality of this evidence?

Social media polls lack scientific rigor and proper sampling

argument, evidence, quality

Question 8

Claim: Regular exercise improves mental health Evidence: A celebrity's Instagram post about fitness benefits How would you rate the quality of this evidence?

Celebrity endorsement without scientific backing

argument, evidence, quality

Question 9

Claim: Remote work increases employee productivity Evidence: Company X saw 20% productivity increase after switching to remote work How would you rate the quality of this evidence?

Single company data - useful but limited generalizability

argument, evidence, quality

Question 10

Claim: Remote work increases employee productivity Evidence: A Twitter poll showing people feel more productive at home How would you rate the quality of this evidence?

Social media polls lack scientific rigor and proper sampling

argument, evidence, quality

Question 11

Claim: Regular exercise improves mental health Evidence: One person's blog about their workout routine How would you rate the quality of this evidence?

Single person's experience, not representative or verified

argument, evidence, quality

Question 12

Original Argument: Nuclear energy should be expanded because it's clean and efficient Which counterargument most effectively challenges this position?

This challenges the 'clean' claim by highlighting the long-term environmental impact

argument, counter, debate

Question 13

Original Argument: Nuclear energy should be expanded because it's clean and efficient Which counterargument most effectively challenges this position?

This challenges the 'clean' claim by highlighting the long-term environmental impact

argument, counter, debate

Question 14

Argument: Four-day work weeks increase productivity because employees are more refreshed and focused when working fewer days. Which new piece of evidence would MOST strengthen this argument?

This strengthens the argument by providing direct empirical support that confirms the claimed causal relationship.

argument, strengthen, weaken, evidence

Question 15

Statement: Should the city build more public parks? Argument: No, parks are expensive to maintain Is this argument strong or weak?

Strong - financial sustainability is a valid policy concern

argument, strength, evaluation

Question 16

Claim: Regular exercise improves mental health Evidence: A 10-year study of 50,000 participants published in a medical journal How would you rate the quality of this evidence?

Large-scale, long-term, peer-reviewed research provides strong evidence

argument, evidence, quality

Question 17

Statement: Should the city build more public parks? Argument: Yes, public parks improve community health and well-being Is this argument strong or weak?

Strong - directly addresses health benefits with clear reasoning

argument, strength, evaluation

Question 18

Statement: Should the city build more public parks? Argument: Yes, because parks are nice to look at Is this argument strong or weak?

Weak - aesthetic preference is not a substantial policy argument

argument, strength, evaluation

Question 19

Analyze this argument: No birds are mammals. All bats are mammals. Therefore, no bats are birds. What is the logical structure?

This follows valid logical form with properly distributed terms

argument, structure, validity

Question 20

Argument: Four-day work weeks increase productivity because employees are more refreshed and focused when working fewer days. Which piece of evidence is LEAST relevant to evaluating this argument?

This evidence is neutral because it doesn't address the core causal claim about productivity/discipline/value, focusing instead on tangential factors.

argument, strengthen, weaken, evidence

🏆 Congratulations on reaching the final worksheet! You've mastered Statement-Argument!

Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet