Argument: College education is no longer worth the cost because tuition has risen faster than inflation while starting salaries have stagnated.
Which piece of evidence is LEAST relevant to evaluating this argument?
This evidence is neutral because it doesn't address the core causal claim about productivity/discipline/value, focusing instead on tangential factors.
Question 2
Text: 'Are we going to stand by while our children's future is destroyed by inaction on climate change?'
What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
Uses a rhetorical question to engage audience and appeals to parental concerns for emotional impact
Question 3
Original Argument: Online learning is superior to classroom learning because it's more flexible and cost-effective
Which counterargument most effectively challenges this position?
This addresses a fundamental educational need that online learning struggles to replicate
Question 4
Claim: Regular exercise improves mental health
Evidence: A celebrity's Instagram post about fitness benefits
How would you rate the quality of this evidence?
Celebrity endorsement without scientific backing
Question 5
Original Argument: All doctors are educated. Some educated people are rich. Therefore, some doctors are rich.
Which argument has the SAME logical structure as the original?
The original argument has the structure: All A are B. Some B are C. Therefore, some A are C.. The correct parallel follows this exact logical pattern, while distractors use different reasoning patterns (quantifier differences, different logical forms, or valid/invalid variations).
Question 6
Original Argument: If the economy improves, unemployment will fall. Unemployment has fallen. Therefore, the economy has improved.
Which argument has the SAME logical structure as the original?
The original argument has the structure: If P then Q. Q is true. Therefore, P is true. (Affirming the consequent - fallacy). The correct parallel follows this exact logical pattern, while distractors use different reasoning patterns (quantifier differences, different logical forms, or valid/invalid variations).
Question 7
Statement: Should the city build more public parks?
Argument: No, because I don't like outdoor activities
Is this argument strong or weak?
Weak - personal preference doesn't constitute public policy argument
Question 8
Analyze this argument: All successful entrepreneurs take calculated risks. Maria takes calculated risks. Therefore, Maria is a successful entrepreneur.
What is the logical structure?
The logic is flawed: just because successful entrepreneurs take risks doesn't mean all risk-takers are successful entrepreneurs
Question 9
Analyze this argument: All successful entrepreneurs take calculated risks. Maria takes calculated risks. Therefore, Maria is a successful entrepreneur.
What is the logical structure?
The logic is flawed: just because successful entrepreneurs take risks doesn't mean all risk-takers are successful entrepreneurs
Question 10
Statement: Should companies allow employees to work from home permanently?
Argument: No, because offices look more professional
Is this argument strong or weak?
Weak - focuses on appearance rather than functionality
Question 11
Text: 'Just as a doctor wouldn't ignore symptoms of disease, we cannot ignore the symptoms of economic decline'
What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
Creates comparison between familiar medical concept and abstract economic situation
Question 12
Statement: 'You can't prove that this new medicine is completely safe, so we shouldn't use it'
What logical fallacy does this argument contain?
This assumes something is false because it can't be proven true
Question 13
Claim: Regular exercise improves mental health
Evidence: A 10-year study of 50,000 participants published in a medical journal
How would you rate the quality of this evidence?
Large-scale, long-term, peer-reviewed research provides strong evidence
Question 14
Original Argument: All doctors are educated. Some educated people are rich. Therefore, some doctors are rich.
Which argument has the SAME logical structure as the original?
The original argument has the structure: All A are B. Some B are C. Therefore, some A are C.. The correct parallel follows this exact logical pattern, while distractors use different reasoning patterns (quantifier differences, different logical forms, or valid/invalid variations).
Question 15
Statement: 'If we allow students to retake exams, soon they'll expect to retake them indefinitely'
What logical fallacy does this argument contain?
This assumes one action will inevitably lead to extreme consequences without evidence
Question 16
Original Argument: Artificial intelligence will solve most of humanity's problems through automation and optimization
Which counterargument most effectively challenges this position?
This directly challenges the premise by showing how AI might create more problems than it solves
Question 17
Statement: 'This traditional farming method has been used for centuries, so it must be effective'
What logical fallacy does this argument contain?
This assumes something is good simply because it's been done for a long time
Question 18
Original Argument: If the economy improves, unemployment will fall. Unemployment has fallen. Therefore, the economy has improved.
Which argument has the SAME logical structure as the original?
The original argument has the structure: If P then Q. Q is true. Therefore, P is true. (Affirming the consequent - fallacy). The correct parallel follows this exact logical pattern, while distractors use different reasoning patterns (quantifier differences, different logical forms, or valid/invalid variations).
Question 19
Statement: Should companies allow employees to work from home permanently?
Argument: Yes, because everyone should do what they want
Is this argument strong or weak?
Weak - too general and doesn't address business needs
Question 20
Statement: Should companies allow employees to work from home permanently?
Argument: Yes, it reduces commuting time and increases productivity
Is this argument strong or weak?