Statement-Argument - Beginner-Intermediate Level: persuasive logic BEGINNER-INTERMEDIATE

Strategic fast track practice for statement-argument: 20 beginner-intermediate-level problems. Worksheet 9 of 30 - Focus: persuasive logic. Develop expertise in strong arguments, weak arguments, logical reasoning with step-by-step solutions. Ideal for developing learners targeting building on fundamentals with moderate challenges.

📝 Worksheet 9 of 30 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Beginner-intermediate level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Statement-Argument
Worksheet 9 of 30 (30% complete)

Question 1

Claim: Remote work increases employee productivity Evidence: A Twitter poll showing people feel more productive at home How would you rate the quality of this evidence?
Social media polls lack scientific rigor and proper sampling

Question 2

Analyze this argument: If the economy improves, unemployment will decrease. Unemployment has decreased. Therefore, the economy has improved. What is the logical structure?
Unemployment could decrease for reasons other than economic improvement

Question 3

Original Argument: No politicians are honest. All honest people are trusted. Therefore, no politicians are trusted. Which argument has the SAME logical structure as the original?
The original argument has the structure: No A are B. All B are C. Therefore, no A are C.. The correct parallel follows this exact logical pattern, while distractors use different reasoning patterns (quantifier differences, different logical forms, or valid/invalid variations).

Question 4

Original Argument: Online learning is superior to classroom learning because it's more flexible and cost-effective Which counterargument most effectively challenges this position?
This addresses a fundamental educational need that online learning struggles to replicate

Question 5

Statement: 'Everyone I know supports this policy, so it must be the right thing to do' What logical fallacy does this argument contain?
The argument assumes something is correct because many people believe it

Question 6

Statement: Should companies allow employees to work from home permanently? Argument: No, because offices look more professional Is this argument strong or weak?
Weak - focuses on appearance rather than functionality

Question 7

Original Argument: All doctors are educated. Some educated people are rich. Therefore, some doctors are rich. Which argument has the SAME logical structure as the original?
The original argument has the structure: All A are B. Some B are C. Therefore, some A are C.. The correct parallel follows this exact logical pattern, while distractors use different reasoning patterns (quantifier differences, different logical forms, or valid/invalid variations).

Question 8

Text: 'Are we going to stand by while our children's future is destroyed by inaction on climate change?' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
Uses a rhetorical question to engage audience and appeals to parental concerns for emotional impact

Question 9

Text: 'We face a choice: either we act now with courage, or we abandon our principles and accept failure' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
Presents only two extreme options while using emotionally charged terms

Question 10

Claim: Regular exercise improves mental health Evidence: One person's blog about their workout routine How would you rate the quality of this evidence?
Single person's experience, not representative or verified

Question 11

Text: 'Just as a doctor wouldn't ignore symptoms of disease, we cannot ignore the symptoms of economic decline' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
Creates comparison between familiar medical concept and abstract economic situation

Question 12

Argument: Four-day work weeks increase productivity because employees are more refreshed and focused when working fewer days. Which new evidence would MOST weaken this argument?
This weakens the argument by providing contradictory evidence or showing the claimed relationship doesn't hold.

Question 13

Statement: Should the city build more public parks? Argument: No, parks are expensive to maintain Is this argument strong or weak?
Strong - financial sustainability is a valid policy concern

Question 14

Statement: Should the city build more public parks? Argument: No, parks are expensive to maintain Is this argument strong or weak?
Strong - financial sustainability is a valid policy concern

Question 15

Original Argument: All doctors are educated. Some educated people are rich. Therefore, some doctors are rich. Which argument has the SAME logical structure as the original?
The original argument has the structure: All A are B. Some B are C. Therefore, some A are C.. The correct parallel follows this exact logical pattern, while distractors use different reasoning patterns (quantifier differences, different logical forms, or valid/invalid variations).

Question 16

Argument: College education is no longer worth the cost because tuition has risen faster than inflation while starting salaries have stagnated. Which piece of evidence is LEAST relevant to evaluating this argument?
This evidence is neutral because it doesn't address the core causal claim about productivity/discipline/value, focusing instead on tangential factors.

Question 17

Statement: Should companies allow employees to work from home permanently? Argument: No, it reduces team collaboration and company culture Is this argument strong or weak?
Strong - addresses legitimate business concerns

Question 18

Text: 'Studies show, experts agree, and data confirms that this policy will benefit everyone' What rhetorical strategy is primarily used here?
References expertise multiple times using parallel structure for emphasis

Question 19

Statement: Should the city build more public parks? Argument: Yes, public parks improve community health and well-being Is this argument strong or weak?
Strong - directly addresses health benefits with clear reasoning

Question 20

Analyze this argument: No birds are mammals. All bats are mammals. Therefore, no bats are birds. What is the logical structure?
This follows valid logical form with properly distributed terms
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet