ReasoningAbility.com

Reverse Syllogism - Intermediate Level: tricky scenarios handling Reverse Syllogism INTERMEDIATE

This expert challenge 📈 worksheet focuses on Reverse Syllogism - a key topic in Syllogism. You'll solve 20 intermediate-level problems (Worksheet 5 of 10). The primary focus is on tricky scenarios handling. Master how to solve reverse syllogism, reverse syllogism tricks, and reverse syllogism shortcut methods through systematic practice.

📝 Worksheet 5 of 10 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Intermediate level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Reverse Syllogism
Worksheet 5 of 10 (44% complete)

Question 1

Given Conclusion: Some engineers are employed Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. All engineers are graduates; Some graduates are employed B. All fruits are graduates; Some strange are employed C. No engineers is a employed; All engineers are graduates D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: Some engineers are employed

Testing Option A: All engineers are graduates; Some graduates are employed

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: All engineers are graduates
Statement 2: Some graduates are employed
Combining these gives: Some engineers are employed ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. All engineers are graduates; Some graduates are employed

Question 2

Given Conclusion: Some squares are shapes Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. All squares are rectangles; Some rectangles are shapes B. All tables are rectangles; Some strange are shapes C. No squares is a shapes; All squares are rectangles D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: Some squares are shapes

Testing Option A: All squares are rectangles; Some rectangles are shapes

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: All squares are rectangles
Statement 2: Some rectangles are shapes
Combining these gives: Some squares are shapes ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. All squares are rectangles; Some rectangles are shapes

Question 3

Given Conclusion: No rose is a fruit Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. No flower is a fruit; All roses are flowers B. No birds are fruit; Some random are flowers C. No rose is a fruit; All flower are fruit D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: No rose is a fruit

Testing Option A: No flower is a fruit; All roses are flowers

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: No flower is a fruit
Statement 2: All roses are flowers
Combining these gives: No rose is a fruit ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. No flower is a fruit; All roses are flowers

Question 4

Given Conclusion: No snake is a mammal Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. No mammal is a reptile; All snakes are reptiles B. No fruits are reptile; Some unrelated are reptiles C. No snake is a mammal; All mammal are reptile D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: No snake is a mammal

Testing Option A: No mammal is a reptile; All snakes are reptiles

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: No mammal is a reptile
Statement 2: All snakes are reptiles
Combining these gives: No snake is a mammal ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. No mammal is a reptile; All snakes are reptiles

Question 5

Given Conclusion: Some books are publications Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. Some books are novels; All novels are publications B. Some fruits are novels; Some random are publications C. No books is a publications; All books are novels D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: Some books are publications

Testing Option A: Some books are novels; All novels are publications

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: Some books are novels
Statement 2: All novels are publications
Combining these gives: Some books are publications ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. Some books are novels; All novels are publications

Question 6

Given Conclusion: Some cats are dogs Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. All cats are animals; Some animals are dogs B. All birds are animals; Some unrelated are dogs C. No cats is a dogs; All cats are animals D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: Some cats are dogs

Testing Option A: All cats are animals; Some animals are dogs

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: All cats are animals
Statement 2: Some animals are dogs
Combining these gives: Some cats are dogs ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. All cats are animals; Some animals are dogs

Question 7

Given Conclusion: Some cats are dogs Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. All cats are animals; Some animals are dogs B. All fruits are animals; Some random are dogs C. No cats is a dogs; All cats are animals D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: Some cats are dogs

Testing Option A: All cats are animals; Some animals are dogs

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: All cats are animals
Statement 2: Some animals are dogs
Combining these gives: Some cats are dogs ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. All cats are animals; Some animals are dogs

Question 8

Given Conclusion: No rose is a fruit Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. No flower is a fruit; All roses are flowers B. No fruits are fruit; Some unrelated are flowers C. No rose is a fruit; All flower are fruit D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: No rose is a fruit

Testing Option A: No flower is a fruit; All roses are flowers

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: No flower is a fruit
Statement 2: All roses are flowers
Combining these gives: No rose is a fruit ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. No flower is a fruit; All roses are flowers

Question 9

Given Conclusion: No snake is a mammal Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. No mammal is a reptile; All snakes are reptiles B. No fruits are reptile; Some strange are reptiles C. No snake is a mammal; All mammal are reptile D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: No snake is a mammal

Testing Option A: No mammal is a reptile; All snakes are reptiles

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: No mammal is a reptile
Statement 2: All snakes are reptiles
Combining these gives: No snake is a mammal ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. No mammal is a reptile; All snakes are reptiles

Question 10

Given Conclusion: No rose is a fruit Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. No flower is a fruit; All roses are flowers B. No birds are fruit; Some random are flowers C. No rose is a fruit; All flower are fruit D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: No rose is a fruit

Testing Option A: No flower is a fruit; All roses are flowers

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: No flower is a fruit
Statement 2: All roses are flowers
Combining these gives: No rose is a fruit ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. No flower is a fruit; All roses are flowers

Question 11

Given Conclusion: Some teachers are artists Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. All teachers are professionals; Some professionals are artists B. All fruits are professionals; Some random are artists C. No teachers is a artists; All teachers are professionals D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: Some teachers are artists

Testing Option A: All teachers are professionals; Some professionals are artists

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: All teachers are professionals
Statement 2: Some professionals are artists
Combining these gives: Some teachers are artists ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. All teachers are professionals; Some professionals are artists

Question 12

Given Conclusion: Some squares are shapes Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. All squares are rectangles; Some rectangles are shapes B. All birds are rectangles; Some strange are shapes C. No squares is a shapes; All squares are rectangles D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: Some squares are shapes

Testing Option A: All squares are rectangles; Some rectangles are shapes

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: All squares are rectangles
Statement 2: Some rectangles are shapes
Combining these gives: Some squares are shapes ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. All squares are rectangles; Some rectangles are shapes

Question 13

Given Conclusion: Some cats are dogs Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. All cats are animals; Some animals are dogs B. All tables are animals; Some random are dogs C. No cats is a dogs; All cats are animals D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: Some cats are dogs

Testing Option A: All cats are animals; Some animals are dogs

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: All cats are animals
Statement 2: Some animals are dogs
Combining these gives: Some cats are dogs ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. All cats are animals; Some animals are dogs

Question 14

Given Conclusion: No snake is a mammal Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. No mammal is a reptile; All snakes are reptiles B. No birds are reptile; Some unrelated are reptiles C. No snake is a mammal; All mammal are reptile D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: No snake is a mammal

Testing Option A: No mammal is a reptile; All snakes are reptiles

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: No mammal is a reptile
Statement 2: All snakes are reptiles
Combining these gives: No snake is a mammal ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. No mammal is a reptile; All snakes are reptiles

Question 15

Given Conclusion: Some squares are shapes Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. All squares are rectangles; Some rectangles are shapes B. All tables are rectangles; Some strange are shapes C. No squares is a shapes; All squares are rectangles D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: Some squares are shapes

Testing Option A: All squares are rectangles; Some rectangles are shapes

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: All squares are rectangles
Statement 2: Some rectangles are shapes
Combining these gives: Some squares are shapes ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. All squares are rectangles; Some rectangles are shapes

Question 16

Given Conclusion: No rose is a fruit Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. No flower is a fruit; All roses are flowers B. No tables are fruit; Some unrelated are flowers C. No rose is a fruit; All flower are fruit D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: No rose is a fruit

Testing Option A: No flower is a fruit; All roses are flowers

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: No flower is a fruit
Statement 2: All roses are flowers
Combining these gives: No rose is a fruit ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. No flower is a fruit; All roses are flowers

Question 17

Given Conclusion: No snake is a mammal Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. No mammal is a reptile; All snakes are reptiles B. No fruits are reptile; Some unrelated are reptiles C. No snake is a mammal; All mammal are reptile D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: No snake is a mammal

Testing Option A: No mammal is a reptile; All snakes are reptiles

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: No mammal is a reptile
Statement 2: All snakes are reptiles
Combining these gives: No snake is a mammal ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. No mammal is a reptile; All snakes are reptiles

Question 18

Given Conclusion: Some books are publications Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. Some books are novels; All novels are publications B. Some fruits are novels; Some random are publications C. No books is a publications; All books are novels D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: Some books are publications

Testing Option A: Some books are novels; All novels are publications

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: Some books are novels
Statement 2: All novels are publications
Combining these gives: Some books are publications ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. Some books are novels; All novels are publications

Question 19

Given Conclusion: Some engineers are employed Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. All engineers are graduates; Some graduates are employed B. All fruits are graduates; Some unrelated are employed C. No engineers is a employed; All engineers are graduates D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: Some engineers are employed

Testing Option A: All engineers are graduates; Some graduates are employed

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: All engineers are graduates
Statement 2: Some graduates are employed
Combining these gives: Some engineers are employed ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. All engineers are graduates; Some graduates are employed

Question 20

Given Conclusion: Some cats are dogs Which set of statements can definitely lead to this conclusion? A. All cats are animals; Some animals are dogs B. All birds are animals; Some random are dogs C. No cats is a dogs; All cats are animals D. Insufficient information
Reverse Syllogism Analysis:
Working backwards from conclusion to verify which premises support it.

Given Conclusion: Some cats are dogs

Testing Option A: All cats are animals; Some animals are dogs

Applying syllogism rules:
Statement 1: All cats are animals
Statement 2: Some animals are dogs
Combining these gives: Some cats are dogs ✓

Why Other Options Fail:
B. Random statements: No logical connection to conclusion
C. Opposite relationships: Would give contradictory conclusion
D. Insufficient: We CAN determine with proper analysis

Answer: A. All cats are animals; Some animals are dogs
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet