Possibility Case: Worksheet 6 - Intermediate-Advanced Practice Possibility Case INTERMEDIATE ADVANCED

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All instruments are devices → instruments inside devices
Step 2: No devices is a furniture → devices and furniture completely separate
Step 3: Since instruments inside devices, instruments also doesn't touch furniture

Analytical Method:
All instruments are devices (A) + No devices is a furniture (E) = A + E = E
Result: No instruments is a furniture

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No instruments is a furniture" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All furniture being instruments is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No instruments is a furniture"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All machines are furniture → machines inside furniture
Step 2: No furniture is a ornaments → furniture and ornaments completely separate
Step 3: Since machines inside furniture, machines also doesn't touch ornaments

Analytical Method:
All machines are furniture (A) + No furniture is a ornaments (E) = A + E = E
Result: No machines is a ornaments

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No machines is a ornaments" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All ornaments being machines is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No machines is a ornaments"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All models are principles → models inside principles
Step 2: No principles is a theories → principles and theories completely separate
Step 3: Since models inside principles, models also doesn't touch theories

Analytical Method:
All models are principles (A) + No principles is a theories (E) = A + E = E
Result: No models is a theories

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No models is a theories" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All theories being models is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No models is a theories"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All diurnal are omnivores → diurnal inside omnivores
Step 2: No omnivores is a vertebrates → omnivores and vertebrates completely separate
Step 3: Since diurnal inside omnivores, diurnal also doesn't touch vertebrates

Analytical Method:
All diurnal are omnivores (A) + No omnivores is a vertebrates (E) = A + E = E
Result: No diurnal is a vertebrates

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No diurnal is a vertebrates" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All vertebrates being diurnal is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No diurnal is a vertebrates"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All vehicles are devices → vehicles inside devices
Step 2: No devices is a ornaments → devices and ornaments completely separate
Step 3: Since vehicles inside devices, vehicles also doesn't touch ornaments

Analytical Method:
All vehicles are devices (A) + No devices is a ornaments (E) = A + E = E
Result: No vehicles is a ornaments

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No vehicles is a ornaments" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All ornaments being vehicles is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No vehicles is a ornaments"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All valuable are durable → valuable inside durable
Step 2: No durable is a versatile → durable and versatile completely separate
Step 3: Since valuable inside durable, valuable also doesn't touch versatile

Analytical Method:
All valuable are durable (A) + No durable is a versatile (E) = A + E = E
Result: No valuable is a versatile

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No valuable is a versatile" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All versatile being valuable is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No valuable is a versatile"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All engineers are athletes → engineers inside athletes
Step 2: No athletes is a artists → athletes and artists completely separate
Step 3: Since engineers inside athletes, engineers also doesn't touch artists

Analytical Method:
All engineers are athletes (A) + No athletes is a artists (E) = A + E = E
Result: No engineers is a artists

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No engineers is a artists" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All artists being engineers is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No engineers is a artists"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All patterns are frameworks → patterns inside frameworks
Step 2: No frameworks is a principles → frameworks and principles completely separate
Step 3: Since patterns inside frameworks, patterns also doesn't touch principles

Analytical Method:
All patterns are frameworks (A) + No frameworks is a principles (E) = A + E = E
Result: No patterns is a principles

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No patterns is a principles" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All principles being patterns is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No patterns is a principles"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All teachers are accountants → teachers inside accountants
Step 2: No accountants is a writers → accountants and writers completely separate
Step 3: Since teachers inside accountants, teachers also doesn't touch writers

Analytical Method:
All teachers are accountants (A) + No accountants is a writers (E) = A + E = E
Result: No teachers is a writers

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No teachers is a writers" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All writers being teachers is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No teachers is a writers"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All methods are structures → methods inside structures
Step 2: No structures is a systems → structures and systems completely separate
Step 3: Since methods inside structures, methods also doesn't touch systems

Analytical Method:
All methods are structures (A) + No structures is a systems (E) = A + E = E
Result: No methods is a systems

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No methods is a systems" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All systems being methods is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No methods is a systems"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All patterns are theories → patterns inside theories
Step 2: No theories is a ideas → theories and ideas completely separate
Step 3: Since patterns inside theories, patterns also doesn't touch ideas

Analytical Method:
All patterns are theories (A) + No theories is a ideas (E) = A + E = E
Result: No patterns is a ideas

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No patterns is a ideas" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All ideas being patterns is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No patterns is a ideas"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All teachers are entrepreneurs → teachers inside entrepreneurs
Step 2: No entrepreneurs is a musicians → entrepreneurs and musicians completely separate
Step 3: Since teachers inside entrepreneurs, teachers also doesn't touch musicians

Analytical Method:
All teachers are entrepreneurs (A) + No entrepreneurs is a musicians (E) = A + E = E
Result: No teachers is a musicians

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No teachers is a musicians" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All musicians being teachers is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No teachers is a musicians"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All nurses are athletes → nurses inside athletes
Step 2: No athletes is a engineers → athletes and engineers completely separate
Step 3: Since nurses inside athletes, nurses also doesn't touch engineers

Analytical Method:
All nurses are athletes (A) + No athletes is a engineers (E) = A + E = E
Result: No nurses is a engineers

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No nurses is a engineers" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All engineers being nurses is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No nurses is a engineers"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All patterns are concepts → patterns inside concepts
Step 2: No concepts is a systems → concepts and systems completely separate
Step 3: Since patterns inside concepts, patterns also doesn't touch systems

Analytical Method:
All patterns are concepts (A) + No concepts is a systems (E) = A + E = E
Result: No patterns is a systems

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No patterns is a systems" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All systems being patterns is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No patterns is a systems"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All systems are theories → systems inside theories
Step 2: No theories is a patterns → theories and patterns completely separate
Step 3: Since systems inside theories, systems also doesn't touch patterns

Analytical Method:
All systems are theories (A) + No theories is a patterns (E) = A + E = E
Result: No systems is a patterns

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No systems is a patterns" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All patterns being systems is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No systems is a patterns"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All invertebrates are amphibians → invertebrates inside amphibians
Step 2: No amphibians is a birds → amphibians and birds completely separate
Step 3: Since invertebrates inside amphibians, invertebrates also doesn't touch birds

Analytical Method:
All invertebrates are amphibians (A) + No amphibians is a birds (E) = A + E = E
Result: No invertebrates is a birds

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No invertebrates is a birds" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All birds being invertebrates is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No invertebrates is a birds"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All versatile are durable → versatile inside durable
Step 2: No durable is a sustainable → durable and sustainable completely separate
Step 3: Since versatile inside durable, versatile also doesn't touch sustainable

Analytical Method:
All versatile are durable (A) + No durable is a sustainable (E) = A + E = E
Result: No versatile is a sustainable

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No versatile is a sustainable" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All sustainable being versatile is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No versatile is a sustainable"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All beautiful are essential → beautiful inside essential
Step 2: No essential is a valuable → essential and valuable completely separate
Step 3: Since beautiful inside essential, beautiful also doesn't touch valuable

Analytical Method:
All beautiful are essential (A) + No essential is a valuable (E) = A + E = E
Result: No beautiful is a valuable

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No beautiful is a valuable" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All valuable being beautiful is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No beautiful is a valuable"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All devices are tools → devices inside tools
Step 2: No tools is a electronics → tools and electronics completely separate
Step 3: Since devices inside tools, devices also doesn't touch electronics

Analytical Method:
All devices are tools (A) + No tools is a electronics (E) = A + E = E
Result: No devices is a electronics

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No devices is a electronics" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All electronics being devices is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No devices is a electronics"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Definite Conclusion Analysis:

Venn Diagram:
Step 1: All pharmacists are engineers → pharmacists inside engineers
Step 2: No engineers is a accountants → engineers and accountants completely separate
Step 3: Since pharmacists inside engineers, pharmacists also doesn't touch accountants

Analytical Method:
All pharmacists are engineers (A) + No engineers is a accountants (E) = A + E = E
Result: No pharmacists is a accountants

Checking Conclusions:

✓ Conclusion I: "No pharmacists is a accountants" - DEFINITE CONCLUSION - FOLLOWS

✗ Conclusion II: "All accountants being pharmacists is a possibility"
Since definite negative exists ("No pharmacists is a accountants"), this possibility is IMPOSSIBLE
DOES NOT FOLLOW

Important Rule: When definite negative conclusion exists between terms, positive possibility becomes FALSE.

Answer: Only conclusion I follows