Master Complementary Pair Some-No - Beginner Level Problems Complementary Pair Some-No BEGINNER

Excel in competitive exams with this skill builder ⚡ worksheet on Complementary Pair Some-No. Worksheet 3 of 10 contains 20 beginner-level problems. Target your step-by-step problem solving skills while practicing complementary pair some-no practice, complementary pair some-no for competitive exams, and how to solve complementary pair some-no.

📝 Worksheet 3 of 10 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Beginner level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Complementary Pair Some-No
Worksheet 3 of 10 (22% complete)

Question 1

Statements: All durable are rare. No rare is a innovative. Conclusions: I. Some innovative are durable. II. No innovative is a durable.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some innovative are durable" and "No innovative is a durable"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All durable are rare" → Circle of durable inside rare
Step 2: "No rare is a innovative" → Circles of rare and innovative completely separate
Step 3: Since durable is inside rare, and rare is separate from innovative, then durable is also separate from innovative
Step 4: Result: "No innovative is a durable" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All durable are rare (A) + No rare is a innovative (E) = A + E = E = No durable is a innovative
By conversion: No innovative is a durable

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 2

Statements: All pharmacists are entrepreneurs. No entrepreneurs is a accountants. Conclusions: I. Some accountants are pharmacists. II. No accountants is a pharmacists.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some accountants are pharmacists" and "No accountants is a pharmacists"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All pharmacists are entrepreneurs" → Circle of pharmacists inside entrepreneurs
Step 2: "No entrepreneurs is a accountants" → Circles of entrepreneurs and accountants completely separate
Step 3: Since pharmacists is inside entrepreneurs, and entrepreneurs is separate from accountants, then pharmacists is also separate from accountants
Step 4: Result: "No accountants is a pharmacists" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All pharmacists are entrepreneurs (A) + No entrepreneurs is a accountants (E) = A + E = E = No pharmacists is a accountants
By conversion: No accountants is a pharmacists

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 3

Statements: All patterns are theories. No theories is a strategies. Conclusions: I. Some strategies are patterns. II. No strategies is a patterns.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some strategies are patterns" and "No strategies is a patterns"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All patterns are theories" → Circle of patterns inside theories
Step 2: "No theories is a strategies" → Circles of theories and strategies completely separate
Step 3: Since patterns is inside theories, and theories is separate from strategies, then patterns is also separate from strategies
Step 4: Result: "No strategies is a patterns" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All patterns are theories (A) + No theories is a strategies (E) = A + E = E = No patterns is a strategies
By conversion: No strategies is a patterns

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 4

Statements: All appliances are gadgets. No gadgets is a machines. Conclusions: I. Some machines are appliances. II. No machines is a appliances.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some machines are appliances" and "No machines is a appliances"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All appliances are gadgets" → Circle of appliances inside gadgets
Step 2: "No gadgets is a machines" → Circles of gadgets and machines completely separate
Step 3: Since appliances is inside gadgets, and gadgets is separate from machines, then appliances is also separate from machines
Step 4: Result: "No machines is a appliances" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All appliances are gadgets (A) + No gadgets is a machines (E) = A + E = E = No appliances is a machines
By conversion: No machines is a appliances

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 5

Statements: All wild are reptiles. No reptiles is a nocturnal. Conclusions: I. Some nocturnal are wild. II. No nocturnal is a wild.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some nocturnal are wild" and "No nocturnal is a wild"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All wild are reptiles" → Circle of wild inside reptiles
Step 2: "No reptiles is a nocturnal" → Circles of reptiles and nocturnal completely separate
Step 3: Since wild is inside reptiles, and reptiles is separate from nocturnal, then wild is also separate from nocturnal
Step 4: Result: "No nocturnal is a wild" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All wild are reptiles (A) + No reptiles is a nocturnal (E) = A + E = E = No wild is a nocturnal
By conversion: No nocturnal is a wild

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 6

Statements: All vertebrates are warm-blooded. No warm-blooded is a carnivores. Conclusions: I. Some carnivores are vertebrates. II. No carnivores is a vertebrates.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some carnivores are vertebrates" and "No carnivores is a vertebrates"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All vertebrates are warm-blooded" → Circle of vertebrates inside warm-blooded
Step 2: "No warm-blooded is a carnivores" → Circles of warm-blooded and carnivores completely separate
Step 3: Since vertebrates is inside warm-blooded, and warm-blooded is separate from carnivores, then vertebrates is also separate from carnivores
Step 4: Result: "No carnivores is a vertebrates" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All vertebrates are warm-blooded (A) + No warm-blooded is a carnivores (E) = A + E = E = No vertebrates is a carnivores
By conversion: No carnivores is a vertebrates

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 7

Statements: All omnivores are mammals. No mammals is a vertebrates. Conclusions: I. Some vertebrates are omnivores. II. No vertebrates is a omnivores.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some vertebrates are omnivores" and "No vertebrates is a omnivores"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All omnivores are mammals" → Circle of omnivores inside mammals
Step 2: "No mammals is a vertebrates" → Circles of mammals and vertebrates completely separate
Step 3: Since omnivores is inside mammals, and mammals is separate from vertebrates, then omnivores is also separate from vertebrates
Step 4: Result: "No vertebrates is a omnivores" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All omnivores are mammals (A) + No mammals is a vertebrates (E) = A + E = E = No omnivores is a vertebrates
By conversion: No vertebrates is a omnivores

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 8

Statements: All rare are reliable. No reliable is a essential. Conclusions: I. Some essential are rare. II. No essential is a rare.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some essential are rare" and "No essential is a rare"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All rare are reliable" → Circle of rare inside reliable
Step 2: "No reliable is a essential" → Circles of reliable and essential completely separate
Step 3: Since rare is inside reliable, and reliable is separate from essential, then rare is also separate from essential
Step 4: Result: "No essential is a rare" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All rare are reliable (A) + No reliable is a essential (E) = A + E = E = No rare is a essential
By conversion: No essential is a rare

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 9

Statements: All lawyers are entrepreneurs. No entrepreneurs is a nurses. Conclusions: I. Some nurses are lawyers. II. No nurses is a lawyers.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some nurses are lawyers" and "No nurses is a lawyers"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All lawyers are entrepreneurs" → Circle of lawyers inside entrepreneurs
Step 2: "No entrepreneurs is a nurses" → Circles of entrepreneurs and nurses completely separate
Step 3: Since lawyers is inside entrepreneurs, and entrepreneurs is separate from nurses, then lawyers is also separate from nurses
Step 4: Result: "No nurses is a lawyers" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All lawyers are entrepreneurs (A) + No entrepreneurs is a nurses (E) = A + E = E = No lawyers is a nurses
By conversion: No nurses is a lawyers

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 10

Statements: All principles are frameworks. No frameworks is a ideas. Conclusions: I. Some ideas are principles. II. No ideas is a principles.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some ideas are principles" and "No ideas is a principles"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All principles are frameworks" → Circle of principles inside frameworks
Step 2: "No frameworks is a ideas" → Circles of frameworks and ideas completely separate
Step 3: Since principles is inside frameworks, and frameworks is separate from ideas, then principles is also separate from ideas
Step 4: Result: "No ideas is a principles" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All principles are frameworks (A) + No frameworks is a ideas (E) = A + E = E = No principles is a ideas
By conversion: No ideas is a principles

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 11

Statements: All ornaments are machines. No machines is a appliances. Conclusions: I. Some appliances are ornaments. II. No appliances is a ornaments.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some appliances are ornaments" and "No appliances is a ornaments"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All ornaments are machines" → Circle of ornaments inside machines
Step 2: "No machines is a appliances" → Circles of machines and appliances completely separate
Step 3: Since ornaments is inside machines, and machines is separate from appliances, then ornaments is also separate from appliances
Step 4: Result: "No appliances is a ornaments" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All ornaments are machines (A) + No machines is a appliances (E) = A + E = E = No ornaments is a appliances
By conversion: No appliances is a ornaments

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 12

Statements: All utensils are devices. No devices is a vehicles. Conclusions: I. Some vehicles are utensils. II. No vehicles is a utensils.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some vehicles are utensils" and "No vehicles is a utensils"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All utensils are devices" → Circle of utensils inside devices
Step 2: "No devices is a vehicles" → Circles of devices and vehicles completely separate
Step 3: Since utensils is inside devices, and devices is separate from vehicles, then utensils is also separate from vehicles
Step 4: Result: "No vehicles is a utensils" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All utensils are devices (A) + No devices is a vehicles (E) = A + E = E = No utensils is a vehicles
By conversion: No vehicles is a utensils

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 13

Statements: All processes are models. No models is a patterns. Conclusions: I. Some patterns are processes. II. No patterns is a processes.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some patterns are processes" and "No patterns is a processes"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All processes are models" → Circle of processes inside models
Step 2: "No models is a patterns" → Circles of models and patterns completely separate
Step 3: Since processes is inside models, and models is separate from patterns, then processes is also separate from patterns
Step 4: Result: "No patterns is a processes" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All processes are models (A) + No models is a patterns (E) = A + E = E = No processes is a patterns
By conversion: No patterns is a processes

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 14

Statements: All nocturnal are warm-blooded. No warm-blooded is a domestic. Conclusions: I. Some domestic are nocturnal. II. No domestic is a nocturnal.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some domestic are nocturnal" and "No domestic is a nocturnal"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All nocturnal are warm-blooded" → Circle of nocturnal inside warm-blooded
Step 2: "No warm-blooded is a domestic" → Circles of warm-blooded and domestic completely separate
Step 3: Since nocturnal is inside warm-blooded, and warm-blooded is separate from domestic, then nocturnal is also separate from domestic
Step 4: Result: "No domestic is a nocturnal" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All nocturnal are warm-blooded (A) + No warm-blooded is a domestic (E) = A + E = E = No nocturnal is a domestic
By conversion: No domestic is a nocturnal

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 15

Statements: All patterns are strategies. No strategies is a theories. Conclusions: I. Some theories are patterns. II. No theories is a patterns.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some theories are patterns" and "No theories is a patterns"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All patterns are strategies" → Circle of patterns inside strategies
Step 2: "No strategies is a theories" → Circles of strategies and theories completely separate
Step 3: Since patterns is inside strategies, and strategies is separate from theories, then patterns is also separate from theories
Step 4: Result: "No theories is a patterns" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All patterns are strategies (A) + No strategies is a theories (E) = A + E = E = No patterns is a theories
By conversion: No theories is a patterns

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 16

Statements: All valuable are versatile. No versatile is a essential. Conclusions: I. Some essential are valuable. II. No essential is a valuable.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some essential are valuable" and "No essential is a valuable"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All valuable are versatile" → Circle of valuable inside versatile
Step 2: "No versatile is a essential" → Circles of versatile and essential completely separate
Step 3: Since valuable is inside versatile, and versatile is separate from essential, then valuable is also separate from essential
Step 4: Result: "No essential is a valuable" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All valuable are versatile (A) + No versatile is a essential (E) = A + E = E = No valuable is a essential
By conversion: No essential is a valuable

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 17

Statements: All electronics are appliances. No appliances is a vehicles. Conclusions: I. Some vehicles are electronics. II. No vehicles is a electronics.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some vehicles are electronics" and "No vehicles is a electronics"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All electronics are appliances" → Circle of electronics inside appliances
Step 2: "No appliances is a vehicles" → Circles of appliances and vehicles completely separate
Step 3: Since electronics is inside appliances, and appliances is separate from vehicles, then electronics is also separate from vehicles
Step 4: Result: "No vehicles is a electronics" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All electronics are appliances (A) + No appliances is a vehicles (E) = A + E = E = No electronics is a vehicles
By conversion: No vehicles is a electronics

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 18

Statements: All omnivores are domestic. No domestic is a warm-blooded. Conclusions: I. Some warm-blooded are omnivores. II. No warm-blooded is a omnivores.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some warm-blooded are omnivores" and "No warm-blooded is a omnivores"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All omnivores are domestic" → Circle of omnivores inside domestic
Step 2: "No domestic is a warm-blooded" → Circles of domestic and warm-blooded completely separate
Step 3: Since omnivores is inside domestic, and domestic is separate from warm-blooded, then omnivores is also separate from warm-blooded
Step 4: Result: "No warm-blooded is a omnivores" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All omnivores are domestic (A) + No domestic is a warm-blooded (E) = A + E = E = No omnivores is a warm-blooded
By conversion: No warm-blooded is a omnivores

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 19

Statements: All structures are theories. No theories is a patterns. Conclusions: I. Some patterns are structures. II. No patterns is a structures.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some patterns are structures" and "No patterns is a structures"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All structures are theories" → Circle of structures inside theories
Step 2: "No theories is a patterns" → Circles of theories and patterns completely separate
Step 3: Since structures is inside theories, and theories is separate from patterns, then structures is also separate from patterns
Step 4: Result: "No patterns is a structures" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All structures are theories (A) + No theories is a patterns (E) = A + E = E = No structures is a patterns
By conversion: No patterns is a structures

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows

Question 20

Statements: All instruments are equipment. No equipment is a utensils. Conclusions: I. Some utensils are instruments. II. No utensils is a instruments.
Complementary Pair Concept:
Conclusions I and II form a complementary pair: "Some utensils are instruments" and "No utensils is a instruments"
These are opposite statements - at least one MUST be true.

Venn Diagram Method:
Step 1: "All instruments are equipment" → Circle of instruments inside equipment
Step 2: "No equipment is a utensils" → Circles of equipment and utensils completely separate
Step 3: Since instruments is inside equipment, and equipment is separate from utensils, then instruments is also separate from utensils
Step 4: Result: "No utensils is a instruments" is TRUE

Analytical Method:
All instruments are equipment (A) + No equipment is a utensils (E) = A + E = E = No instruments is a utensils
By conversion: No utensils is a instruments

Either-Or Case:
Since the conclusions form a complementary pair and one is definitely true, answer is "Either-Or".

Answer: Either conclusion I or II follows
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet