ReasoningAbility.com

Multi-Criteria Strength Analysis Beginner-Intermediate Worksheet: Focus on common variations practice Multi-Criteria Strength Analysis BEGINNER INTERMEDIATE

Level up your Multi-Criteria Strength Analysis skills! You're at Worksheet 4 of 10 (33% through this series). This step-up challenge worksheet features 20 beginner-intermediate-level problems with a focus on common variations practice. Topics covered: multi-criteria strength analysis for competitive exams, how to solve multi-criteria strength analysis, multi-criteria strength analysis tricks.

📝 Worksheet 4 of 10 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Beginner Intermediate level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Multi-Criteria Strength Analysis
Worksheet 4 of 10 (33% complete)

Question 1

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: We cannot afford UBI without massive tax increases Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Moderate, Relevance: Strong, Comprehensiveness: Moderate. Overall: Moderate to Strong

Question 2

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: We cannot afford UBI without massive tax increases What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Doesn't account for economic stimulus effects. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 3

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: We cannot afford UBI without massive tax increases Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Moderate, Relevance: Strong, Comprehensiveness: Moderate. Overall: Moderate to Strong

Question 4

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: Shorter work weeks sound nice and would make everyone happier Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Weak, Relevance: Moderate, Comprehensiveness: Weak. Overall: Weak

Question 5

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: People have worked 5 days a week for decades, so we shouldn't change it Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Weak, Relevance: Weak, Comprehensiveness: Weak. Overall: Weak

Question 6

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: Pilot programs in multiple countries show 4-day weeks maintain productivity while improving employee well-being and reducing environmental impact through less commuting Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Strong, Relevance: Strong, Comprehensiveness: Strong. Overall: Strong

Question 7

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: Pilot programs in multiple countries show 4-day weeks maintain productivity while improving employee well-being and reducing environmental impact through less commuting What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Doesn't address implementation costs. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 8

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: Shorter work weeks sound nice and would make everyone happier Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Weak, Relevance: Moderate, Comprehensiveness: Weak. Overall: Weak

Question 9

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: Reducing work hours could harm economic competitiveness against countries with longer work weeks Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Moderate, Relevance: Strong, Comprehensiveness: Moderate. Overall: Moderate to Strong

Question 10

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: We cannot afford UBI without massive tax increases Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Moderate, Relevance: Strong, Comprehensiveness: Moderate. Overall: Moderate to Strong

Question 11

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: We cannot afford UBI without massive tax increases What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Doesn't account for economic stimulus effects. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 12

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: Pilot programs in multiple countries show 4-day weeks maintain productivity while improving employee well-being and reducing environmental impact through less commuting What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Doesn't address implementation costs. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 13

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: Free money will make people lazy and stop working What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Contradicted by pilot study evidence. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 14

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: Pilot studies in Finland and Kenya show UBI reduces poverty and improves mental health without reducing employment What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Long-term economic effects unknown. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 15

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: Pilot programs in multiple countries show 4-day weeks maintain productivity while improving employee well-being and reducing environmental impact through less commuting Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Strong, Relevance: Strong, Comprehensiveness: Strong. Overall: Strong

Question 16

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: Pilot programs in multiple countries show 4-day weeks maintain productivity while improving employee well-being and reducing environmental impact through less commuting What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Doesn't address implementation costs. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 17

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: Shorter work weeks sound nice and would make everyone happier Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Weak, Relevance: Moderate, Comprehensiveness: Weak. Overall: Weak

Question 18

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: People have worked 5 days a week for decades, so we shouldn't change it Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Weak, Relevance: Weak, Comprehensiveness: Weak. Overall: Weak

Question 19

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: Free money will make people lazy and stop working What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Contradicted by pilot study evidence. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 20

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: Free money will make people lazy and stop working Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Weak, Relevance: Moderate, Comprehensiveness: Weak. Overall: Weak
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet