ReasoningAbility.com

Multi-Criteria Strength Analysis: Worksheet 2 - Beginner Practice Multi-Criteria Strength Analysis BEGINNER

Ready to master Multi-Criteria Strength Analysis? This entry level practice worksheet (2/10) presents 20 beginner-level challenges. Focus area: pattern recognition. Learn to solve multi-criteria strength analysis reasoning questions, handle multi-criteria strength analysis practice, and perfect multi-criteria strength analysis for competitive exams with our step-by-step solutions.

📝 Worksheet 2 of 10 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Beginner level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Multi-Criteria Strength Analysis
Worksheet 2 of 10 (11% complete)

Question 1

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: Free money will make people lazy and stop working Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Weak, Relevance: Moderate, Comprehensiveness: Weak. Overall: Weak

Question 2

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: Free money will make people lazy and stop working Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Weak, Relevance: Moderate, Comprehensiveness: Weak. Overall: Weak

Question 3

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: Free money will make people lazy and stop working Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Weak, Relevance: Moderate, Comprehensiveness: Weak. Overall: Weak

Question 4

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: Shorter work weeks sound nice and would make everyone happier What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: No evidence, purely emotional. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 5

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: We cannot afford UBI without massive tax increases Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Moderate, Relevance: Strong, Comprehensiveness: Moderate. Overall: Moderate to Strong

Question 6

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: We cannot afford UBI without massive tax increases Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Moderate, Relevance: Strong, Comprehensiveness: Moderate. Overall: Moderate to Strong

Question 7

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: Free money will make people lazy and stop working Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Weak, Relevance: Moderate, Comprehensiveness: Weak. Overall: Weak

Question 8

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: Pilot studies in Finland and Kenya show UBI reduces poverty and improves mental health without reducing employment Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Strong, Relevance: Strong, Comprehensiveness: Strong. Overall: Strong

Question 9

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: Free money will make people lazy and stop working What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Contradicted by pilot study evidence. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 10

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: Free money will make people lazy and stop working What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Contradicted by pilot study evidence. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 11

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: People have worked 5 days a week for decades, so we shouldn't change it Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Weak, Relevance: Weak, Comprehensiveness: Weak. Overall: Weak

Question 12

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: People have worked 5 days a week for decades, so we shouldn't change it What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Appeal to tradition fallacy. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 13

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: We cannot afford UBI without massive tax increases What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Doesn't account for economic stimulus effects. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 14

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: Pilot studies in Finland and Kenya show UBI reduces poverty and improves mental health without reducing employment What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Long-term economic effects unknown. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 15

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: We cannot afford UBI without massive tax increases Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Moderate, Relevance: Strong, Comprehensiveness: Moderate. Overall: Moderate to Strong

Question 16

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: Free money will make people lazy and stop working What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Contradicted by pilot study evidence. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 17

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: Pilot studies in Finland and Kenya show UBI reduces poverty and improves mental health without reducing employment Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Strong, Relevance: Strong, Comprehensiveness: Strong. Overall: Strong

Question 18

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: We cannot afford UBI without massive tax increases Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Moderate, Relevance: Strong, Comprehensiveness: Moderate. Overall: Moderate to Strong

Question 19

Proposal: Implementing a four-day work week nationwide Argument: People have worked 5 days a week for decades, so we shouldn't change it What is the MOST significant weakness or missing element in this argument?
Key weakness: Appeal to tradition fallacy. This limits the argument's strength despite other merits.

Question 20

Proposal: Universal basic income of $1000/month for all citizens Argument: We cannot afford UBI without massive tax increases Evaluate this argument across multiple criteria (evidence quality, relevance, comprehensiveness):
Evidence: Moderate, Relevance: Strong, Comprehensiveness: Moderate. Overall: Moderate to Strong
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet