Decision Making - Beginner-Intermediate Level: trade-off analysis BEGINNER-INTERMEDIATE

Ready to master decision making? This benchmark test features 20 beginner-intermediate-level challenges. Worksheet 12 of 30 sharpens your trade-off analysis skills. Master decision analysis, outcome evaluation, decision criteria through guided practice. Perfect for developing test preparation.

📝 Worksheet 12 of 30 • 20 questions • ⏱️ Estimated time: 20 minutes • 🎯 Beginner-intermediate level

What you'll learn in this worksheet:
Your progress through Decision Making
Worksheet 12 of 30 (40% complete)

Question 1

Situation: A hospital must choose between purchasing new MRI machine (improves diagnosis) or upgrading emergency room (reduces wait times). What should be the primary criterion for this decision?
In healthcare, patient outcomes should be the primary decision criterion. Both options improve care, but the one with greater impact on patient health should be prioritized.

Question 2

Situation: Emergency room with one ventilator left. Four patients need it: 20-year-old (90% survival), 40-year-old (70% survival), 60-year-old (50% survival), 80-year-old (30% survival). What is the best decision in this emergency situation?
Utilitarian approach - maximizing total life years saved. Youngest patient has highest potential remaining lifespan and good survival probability.

Question 3

Decision: Company considering automation that will eliminate 200 jobs but increase efficiency by 40% Considering all stakeholder impacts, what is the most ethical and practical approach?
Balances efficiency gains with social responsibility. Saves 100 jobs while improving efficiency, providing transition support for affected workers. This approach balances competing interests while prioritizing overall welfare.

Question 4

Decision: Invest in R&D for new product or improve existing product? Based on expected value analysis, what is the optimal strategy?
New product: 30% success → 500 profit, 70% failure → -200 loss = EV = 150-140=10. Improve existing: 80% success → 200 profit, 20% no gain = EV=160. Existing product improvement has higher EV.

Question 5

Situation: A company can use $500,000 to: upgrade equipment (increase efficiency 20%), hire employees (expand capacity 30%), or keep as cash reserve (maintain financial stability) Considering opportunity costs, what is the best choice?
30% capacity expansion provides highest growth potential if market demand supports it. The opportunity cost of hiring is foregone efficiency gains, but capacity growth typically drives revenue more directly.

Question 6

Decision: Pharmaceutical company setting price for life-saving drug Considering all stakeholder impacts, what is the most ethical and practical approach?
Balances profit motive with access to medicine. Differentiated pricing maximizes revenue while ensuring affordability in developing nations. This approach balances competing interests while prioritizing overall welfare.

Question 7

Situation: A government agency needs to allocate limited disaster relief funds between flood-prone and earthquake-prone regions. What should be the primary criterion for this decision?
Risk assessment should prioritize areas with highest probability of imminent disaster, as prevention is more effective than post-disaster relief.

Question 8

Situation: Career decision for mid-level professional with family responsibilities (sole earner, 2 children) Considering risk assessment, what is the most appropriate decision?
As sole earner with family responsibilities, income stability is critical. The downside risk of startup failure (50%) or business failure (70%) is too high given family obligations.

Question 9

Decision: Outsource manufacturing or build in-house facility? Based on expected value analysis, what is the optimal strategy?
Outsource: guaranteed 300 cost savings. In-house: 70% chance of 500 savings, 30% chance of 100 loss → EV=350-30=320. Outsourcing gives guaranteed savings with lower risk.

Question 10

Situation: A company can use $500,000 to: upgrade equipment (increase efficiency 20%), hire employees (expand capacity 30%), or keep as cash reserve (maintain financial stability) Considering opportunity costs, what is the best choice?
30% capacity expansion provides highest growth potential if market demand supports it. The opportunity cost of hiring is foregone efficiency gains, but capacity growth typically drives revenue more directly.

Question 11

Decision: Hospital choosing between specialized cancer center or expanded general services Considering all stakeholder impacts, what is the most ethical and practical approach?
Greatest good for greatest number - 10,000 patients vs 500. General services impact broader community while cancer center serves niche population. This approach balances competing interests while prioritizing overall welfare.

Question 12

Scenario: Selecting a candidate for promotion Criteria weights: Technical skills (30%), Leadership (30%), Experience (25%), Cultural fit (15%) Scores: Candidate P: 9/7/8/8, Candidate Q: 7/9/7/7, Candidate R: 8/8/9/9 Based on weighted multi-criteria evaluation, which option should be selected?
P=2.7+2.1+2.0+1.2=8.0; Q=2.1+2.7+1.75+1.05=7.6; R=2.4+2.4+2.25+1.35=8.4. Candidate R scores highest across all criteria.

Question 13

Situation: Medical treatment decision for 75-year-old patient with heart condition Considering risk assessment, what is the most appropriate decision?
For an elderly patient, balancing success rate with mortality risk is key. Medication offers reasonable success (60%) with low mortality (5%), avoiding surgical risks while providing meaningful improvement.

Question 14

Scenario: Choosing a location for new factory Criteria weights: Labor costs (25%), Logistics (25%), Tax incentives (20%), Skilled workforce (20%), Energy costs (10%) Scores: Location X: 8/7/9/6/8, Location Y: 6/8/7/9/7, Location Z: 7/9/6/8/9 Based on weighted multi-criteria evaluation, which option should be selected?
X=2.0+1.75+1.8+1.2+0.8=7.55; Y=1.5+2.0+1.4+1.8+0.7=7.4; Z=1.75+2.25+1.2+1.6+0.9=7.7. Location Z scores highest.

Question 15

Situation: Investment decision for conservative investor nearing retirement (5 years from retirement) Considering risk assessment, what is the most appropriate decision?
For a conservative investor nearing retirement, capital preservation is paramount. Government bonds provide guaranteed returns with zero loss risk, aligning with the short time horizon and risk tolerance.

Question 16

Decision: Company considering automation that will eliminate 200 jobs but increase efficiency by 40% Considering all stakeholder impacts, what is the most ethical and practical approach?
Balances efficiency gains with social responsibility. Saves 100 jobs while improving efficiency, providing transition support for affected workers. This approach balances competing interests while prioritizing overall welfare.

Question 17

Situation: During a riot, you must decide whether to deploy tear gas on a crowd of 500 protesters (risk of injury to 50, but stop violence) or let them protest (risk of 100 injuries from violence). What is the best decision in this emergency situation?
Risk assessment: 50 injuries from tear gas vs 100 injuries from violence. Immediate deployment minimizes total harm despite short-term side effects.

Question 18

Decision: Launch new product now or wait 6 months for more market research? Based on expected value analysis, what is the optimal strategy?
Launch now: 40% success → expected value = 0.4×1000 = 400. Wait: 70% success after research → expected value = 0.7×900 = 630 (accounting for 100 research cost). Higher EV makes waiting optimal.

Question 19

Situation: A company must decide between expanding to Location A (high rent, skilled workforce) or Location B (low rent, requires training employees). What should be the primary criterion for this decision?
This considers the strategic impact beyond immediate costs. Even with higher rent, a skilled workforce and better market access can generate higher returns, making growth potential the primary criterion.

Question 20

Decision: Company considering automation that will eliminate 200 jobs but increase efficiency by 40% Considering all stakeholder impacts, what is the most ethical and practical approach?
Balances efficiency gains with social responsibility. Saves 100 jobs while improving efficiency, providing transition support for affected workers. This approach balances competing interests while prioritizing overall welfare.
Previous Worksheet Next Worksheet