Master statement_consistency_check - Beginner Level Problems statement_consistency_check BEGINNER

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Sanjay tells truth, then Leena has ruby.
But Leena claims not to have it - contradiction if Leena tells truth.
If Leena lies, then Leena DOES have the item - consistent with Sanjay.
Then Pooja says Sanjay lies - but we assumed Sanjay tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Sanjay lies, then Leena does NOT have ruby.
Leena says the same thing - consistent if Leena tells truth.
Pooja says Sanjay lies - consistent if Pooja tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Sanjay lies, Leena and Pooja tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Anita tells truth, then Vikram has sapphire.
But Vikram claims not to have it - contradiction if Vikram tells truth.
If Vikram lies, then Vikram DOES have the item - consistent with Anita.
Then Divya says Anita lies - but we assumed Anita tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Anita lies, then Vikram does NOT have sapphire.
Vikram says the same thing - consistent if Vikram tells truth.
Divya says Anita lies - consistent if Divya tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Anita lies, Vikram and Divya tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Farhan tells truth, then Vikram has pearl.
But Vikram claims not to have it - contradiction if Vikram tells truth.
If Vikram lies, then Vikram DOES have the item - consistent with Farhan.
Then Gaurav says Farhan lies - but we assumed Farhan tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Farhan lies, then Vikram does NOT have pearl.
Vikram says the same thing - consistent if Vikram tells truth.
Gaurav says Farhan lies - consistent if Gaurav tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Farhan lies, Vikram and Gaurav tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Kiran tells truth, then Ravi has crystal.
But Ravi claims not to have it - contradiction if Ravi tells truth.
If Ravi lies, then Ravi DOES have the item - consistent with Kiran.
Then Vikram says Kiran lies - but we assumed Kiran tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Kiran lies, then Ravi does NOT have crystal.
Ravi says the same thing - consistent if Ravi tells truth.
Vikram says Kiran lies - consistent if Vikram tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Kiran lies, Ravi and Vikram tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Deepa tells truth, then Amit has ruby.
But Amit claims not to have it - contradiction if Amit tells truth.
If Amit lies, then Amit DOES have the item - consistent with Deepa.
Then Divya says Deepa lies - but we assumed Deepa tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Deepa lies, then Amit does NOT have ruby.
Amit says the same thing - consistent if Amit tells truth.
Divya says Deepa lies - consistent if Divya tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Deepa lies, Amit and Divya tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Amit tells truth, then Sanjay has gold coin.
But Sanjay claims not to have it - contradiction if Sanjay tells truth.
If Sanjay lies, then Sanjay DOES have the item - consistent with Amit.
Then Gaurav says Amit lies - but we assumed Amit tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Amit lies, then Sanjay does NOT have gold coin.
Sanjay says the same thing - consistent if Sanjay tells truth.
Gaurav says Amit lies - consistent if Gaurav tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Amit lies, Sanjay and Gaurav tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Neha tells truth, then Divya has emerald.
But Divya claims not to have it - contradiction if Divya tells truth.
If Divya lies, then Divya DOES have the item - consistent with Neha.
Then Vikram says Neha lies - but we assumed Neha tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Neha lies, then Divya does NOT have emerald.
Divya says the same thing - consistent if Divya tells truth.
Vikram says Neha lies - consistent if Vikram tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Neha lies, Divya and Vikram tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Divya tells truth, then Farhan has crystal.
But Farhan claims not to have it - contradiction if Farhan tells truth.
If Farhan lies, then Farhan DOES have the item - consistent with Divya.
Then Leena says Divya lies - but we assumed Divya tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Divya lies, then Farhan does NOT have crystal.
Farhan says the same thing - consistent if Farhan tells truth.
Leena says Divya lies - consistent if Leena tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Divya lies, Farhan and Leena tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Meera tells truth, then Anita has bronze medal.
But Anita claims not to have it - contradiction if Anita tells truth.
If Anita lies, then Anita DOES have the item - consistent with Meera.
Then Manoj says Meera lies - but we assumed Meera tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Meera lies, then Anita does NOT have bronze medal.
Anita says the same thing - consistent if Anita tells truth.
Manoj says Meera lies - consistent if Manoj tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Meera lies, Anita and Manoj tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Kiran tells truth, then Manoj has crystal.
But Manoj claims not to have it - contradiction if Manoj tells truth.
If Manoj lies, then Manoj DOES have the item - consistent with Kiran.
Then Anita says Kiran lies - but we assumed Kiran tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Kiran lies, then Manoj does NOT have crystal.
Manoj says the same thing - consistent if Manoj tells truth.
Anita says Kiran lies - consistent if Anita tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Kiran lies, Manoj and Anita tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Divya tells truth, then Anita has sapphire.
But Anita claims not to have it - contradiction if Anita tells truth.
If Anita lies, then Anita DOES have the item - consistent with Divya.
Then Pooja says Divya lies - but we assumed Divya tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Divya lies, then Anita does NOT have sapphire.
Anita says the same thing - consistent if Anita tells truth.
Pooja says Divya lies - consistent if Pooja tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Divya lies, Anita and Pooja tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Pooja tells truth, then Vikram has pearl.
But Vikram claims not to have it - contradiction if Vikram tells truth.
If Vikram lies, then Vikram DOES have the item - consistent with Pooja.
Then Sanjay says Pooja lies - but we assumed Pooja tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Pooja lies, then Vikram does NOT have pearl.
Vikram says the same thing - consistent if Vikram tells truth.
Sanjay says Pooja lies - consistent if Sanjay tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Pooja lies, Vikram and Sanjay tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Anita tells truth, then Amit has silver ring.
But Amit claims not to have it - contradiction if Amit tells truth.
If Amit lies, then Amit DOES have the item - consistent with Anita.
Then Ravi says Anita lies - but we assumed Anita tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Anita lies, then Amit does NOT have silver ring.
Amit says the same thing - consistent if Amit tells truth.
Ravi says Anita lies - consistent if Ravi tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Anita lies, Amit and Ravi tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Anita tells truth, then Gaurav has emerald.
But Gaurav claims not to have it - contradiction if Gaurav tells truth.
If Gaurav lies, then Gaurav DOES have the item - consistent with Anita.
Then Harsha says Anita lies - but we assumed Anita tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Anita lies, then Gaurav does NOT have emerald.
Gaurav says the same thing - consistent if Gaurav tells truth.
Harsha says Anita lies - consistent if Harsha tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Anita lies, Gaurav and Harsha tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Kiran tells truth, then Vikram has bronze medal.
But Vikram claims not to have it - contradiction if Vikram tells truth.
If Vikram lies, then Vikram DOES have the item - consistent with Kiran.
Then Priya says Kiran lies - but we assumed Kiran tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Kiran lies, then Vikram does NOT have bronze medal.
Vikram says the same thing - consistent if Vikram tells truth.
Priya says Kiran lies - consistent if Priya tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Kiran lies, Vikram and Priya tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Meera tells truth, then Pooja has ruby.
But Pooja claims not to have it - contradiction if Pooja tells truth.
If Pooja lies, then Pooja DOES have the item - consistent with Meera.
Then Deepa says Meera lies - but we assumed Meera tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Meera lies, then Pooja does NOT have ruby.
Pooja says the same thing - consistent if Pooja tells truth.
Deepa says Meera lies - consistent if Deepa tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Meera lies, Pooja and Deepa tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Sunil tells truth, then Ravi has gold coin.
But Ravi claims not to have it - contradiction if Ravi tells truth.
If Ravi lies, then Ravi DOES have the item - consistent with Sunil.
Then Meera says Sunil lies - but we assumed Sunil tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Sunil lies, then Ravi does NOT have gold coin.
Ravi says the same thing - consistent if Ravi tells truth.
Meera says Sunil lies - consistent if Meera tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Sunil lies, Ravi and Meera tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Sanjay tells truth, then Leena has diamond.
But Leena claims not to have it - contradiction if Leena tells truth.
If Leena lies, then Leena DOES have the item - consistent with Sanjay.
Then Kiran says Sanjay lies - but we assumed Sanjay tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Sanjay lies, then Leena does NOT have diamond.
Leena says the same thing - consistent if Leena tells truth.
Kiran says Sanjay lies - consistent if Kiran tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Sanjay lies, Leena and Kiran tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Meera tells truth, then Vikram has diamond.
But Vikram claims not to have it - contradiction if Vikram tells truth.
If Vikram lies, then Vikram DOES have the item - consistent with Meera.
Then Leena says Meera lies - but we assumed Meera tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Meera lies, then Vikram does NOT have diamond.
Vikram says the same thing - consistent if Vikram tells truth.
Leena says Meera lies - consistent if Leena tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Meera lies, Vikram and Leena tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.

Let's test if all statements can be true:

Assumption 1: If Kiran tells truth, then Leena has gold coin.
But Leena claims not to have it - contradiction if Leena tells truth.
If Leena lies, then Leena DOES have the item - consistent with Kiran.
Then Amit says Kiran lies - but we assumed Kiran tells truth - contradiction!

Assumption 2: If Kiran lies, then Leena does NOT have gold coin.
Leena says the same thing - consistent if Leena tells truth.
Amit says Kiran lies - consistent if Amit tells truth.

Therefore, all statements CAN be consistent when Kiran lies, Leena and Amit tell truth.
Thus, the statements are consistent.